Graphomya maculata (Scopoli, 1763)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3702.4.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:717368C3-6909-4DCF-A825-D138B80B10A2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6164774 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5024BB7A-FF82-6D25-FF7C-3CF2D0E6FAD4 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Graphomya maculata (Scopoli, 1763) |
status |
|
Graphomya maculata (Scopoli, 1763) View in CoL
( Figs. 9 View FIGURES 8 – 9 , 65 View FIGURES 61 – 65 )
Type material examined. Neotype male, pinned, “ Macedonia / Capt. J. Carnivach. / D.S.O.R.A.M.C. / Pres. by / Wellcome Bur. Sc. Res. / 1920-336” handwr. on white paper; “♂” handwr. on white paper; “M. N. / N. [print.] 2282 [handwr.]” on white paper, black frame; “Neotipo” handwr. on yellow paper ( MNRJ).
Other material examined. ARGENTINA : BUENOS AIRES: 1 female, Carlos Casares, Ea. San Claudio on Conium maculatum , 15-XII-2008, Torretta leg. ( FAUBA). FORMOSA: 2 females, 2 males, Gran Guardia, II-1953. Foerter leg. ( FML). SALTA: 2 females, Pocitos, 23-XI-1978, Mariluis leg. ( MACN). TUCUMAN: 1 male, El Siambon, 1123 m.a.s.l., XI-2010, Mulieri & Patitucci leg. ( MACN).
Distribution in Argentina ( Fig. 65 View FIGURES 61 – 65 ): Buenos Aires (new record); Formosa (new record); Salta (new record); Tucumán (new record).
Remarks.The only previous reference of G. maculata in Argentina ( Shannon & Del Ponte 1926) is a misidentification. We examined the specimens studied by these authors, and we identified them as G. auriceps . Marques & Couri (2007) presented a detailed redescription of this species. The immature stages are present in Skidmore (1985).
Biology. There is little information about this species. Several specimens studied in this work were collected on Conium maculatum L.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.