Relationship to
Nepenthes mollis
View in CoL
Nepenthes fractiflexa
View in CoL
is very closely allied to
N. mollis
View in CoL
, which, following the emended circumscription of Robinson et al. (2019), includes
N. hurrelliana
View in CoL
. Prior to the description of
N. hurrelliana
View in CoL
by Cheek et al. (2003), the northern populations of
N. mollis
View in CoL
were variously treated as the natural hybrid
N. fusca
View in CoL
[s.lat.] ×
N. veitchii ( Phillipps & Lamb 1988)
View in CoL
, as
N. veitchii (Anon. 1990)
View in CoL
, or as an undescribed species ( Phillipps & Lamb 1996, Clarke 1997, Steiner 2002), though Salmon (1999) astutely noted—based only on the limited evidence available at the time—that they might be conspecific with
N. mollis
View in CoL
.
Lee (2004) and Phillipps et al. (2008) considered plants representing
Nepenthes fractiflexa
View in CoL
from Mt. Mulu and the Kelabit Highlands to fall within the natural variability of
N. hurrelliana
View in CoL
, the former proposing that the differences in stem morphology could be explained by ecological factors, with the long-decurrent petiolar wings of
N. fractiflexa
View in CoL
postulated to be expressed only in the shadier environs afforded by lower-elevation montane forest. This hypothesis is disproved by the exposed, high-elevation, ridgetop habitat of plants from Mt. Bagong and Mt. Lumut, which nonetheless have the characteristic stem of the other populations ( Fig. 6
View FIGURE 6
). Indeed, the known elevational ranges of the two species— 1400–2150 m for
N. fractiflexa
View in CoL
and 1300–2400 m for
N. mollis
View in CoL
(see Phillipps et al. 2008, Robinson et al. 2019)—are very similar.
When the Mt. Bagong population of
Nepenthes fractiflexa
was first documented in May 2018 by Chien Lee and Mathias Scharmann ( Lee 2018, Scharmann 2018b), and again in June 2018 by AR, the plants were recognised as conspecific with the Mulu specimens, but, owing to their general morphology and geographical proximity to the Kemul Massif, were initially considered to represent
N. mollis
s.str. (as distinct from
N. hurrelliana
; Clarke 2018, AR pers. observ.). The subsequent discovery—on Batu Luye’u in the Kemul Massif on 07 July 2018 —of plants matching exactly the holotype of
N. mollis
made it clear that
N. mollis
was conspecific with
N. hurrelliana
, and that the specimens from Bagong and Mulu represented not
N. mollis
, but rather a closely related and hitherto undescribed species ( Robinson et al. 2019).
Nepenthes fractiflexa
View in CoL
shares with
N. mollis
View in CoL
the general form of its pitchers and broadly decurrent petiolar wings (though in
N. mollis
View in CoL
their development varies even within populations, depending on growth phase, and they never span the length of the internode).
N. fractiflexa
View in CoL
is however a more diminutive and gracile plant in all respects, with markedly smaller upper pitchers and a less developed indumentum. It also differs in its growth habit and plant architecture, producing secondary stems with far greater frequency and often having activated axillary buds. The peristomes of both the lower and upper pitchers are much more developed in
N. mollis
View in CoL
, having larger teeth and ribs and being significantly larger in both relative and absolute terms. In intermediate pitchers in particular, it is not uncommon for the height of the peristome column to equal or even exceed that of the ascidium below the peristome (AR pers. observ.). By contrast, in
N. fractiflexa
View in CoL
the peristome is usually little more than half to two-thirds as tall as the ascidium beneath. The lid of
N. mollis
View in CoL
is also markedly broader, particularly in upper pitchers. A basal lid appendage is conspicuous in all pitchers of
N. mollis
View in CoL
but reaches its greatest development in the upper pitchers, where it is 4–6 mm long and often hook-shaped; the opposite is true in
N. fractiflexa
View in CoL
, with lower pitchers having a prominent basal appendage ( Fig. 4E
View FIGURE 4
) and upper pitchers only a slight basal swelling ( Fig. 5C
View FIGURE 5
).
N. fractiflexa
View in CoL
has unusually long partial peduncles that bifurcate medially;
N. mollis
View in CoL
is variable in this respect, the partial peduncles often being shorter and branching basally ( Cheek et al. 2003, Robinson et al. 2019), though they may also branch medially (see e.g., the specimens S. 80020 (Julaihi & Jemree) and S. 87447 (Lee & Jong), both SAR!).
Literature records for
Nepenthes mollis
View in CoL
(mostly reported as
N. hurrelliana
View in CoL
) cover Brunei (Bukit Pagon; 1850 m), Kalimantan(two peaks within the Kemul Massif:Batu Luye’u at 2054 m and Mt.Kemul at 1847 m), Sabah (Mt. Lumarku [1966 m] and the Meligan Range near Long Pasia, including Mt. Rimau [ca. 1900 m]), and Sarawak (Batu Buli, Mt. Mulu, and Mt. Murud) ( Cheek et al. 2003, Phillipps et al. 2008, Lamb et al. 2009, Scharmann 2010a, 2010b, 2018 a, Robinson et al. 2019). While it cannot be stated definitively that
N. mollis
View in CoL
is absent from Mt. Mulu, all candidates examined so far appear to represent
N. fractiflexa
View in CoL
. The same is true of plants from Batu Lawi grown for some years in
Australia
View in CoL
(Greg Bourke pers. comm.). The supposed Batu Buli population, which naturally hybridises with
N. chaniana
View in CoL
and
N. lowii
View in CoL
, is somewhat atypical and has been referred to as
N. aff. hurrelliana
View in CoL
( Scharmann 2010a, 2018a), but based on the photographs available to the authors—and particularly the lower pitcher wings and colouration of the pitcher body—it is considered likely to fall within the natural variation of
N. fractiflexa
View in CoL
, though the development of the peristome column is reminiscent of
N. mollis
View in CoL
in terms of its height. The presence of the latter species on Batu Buli or Batu Lawi would not be surprising given the peaks’ proximity to Mt. Murud, and further field studies are merited. The plants on Mt. Rimau include both
N. mollis
View in CoL
and a putative natural hybrid between
N. mollis
View in CoL
and
N. zakriana
View in CoL
(Melaga Lait pers. comm., 2019); the latter species has not been confirmed this far south previously (see Robinson et al. 2019: fig. 4). Additionally, verifiable localities for
N. mollis
View in CoL
known to the authors include: Mentarang Hulu (ca. 1600 m) in North Kalimantan, where it grows with
N. lowii
View in CoL
,
N. tentaculata
View in CoL
, and the little-known
N. fusca
View in CoL
s.str. (AL pers. observ., 2017); Mt. Lunjut (ca. 1850 m), also in North Kalimantan (Sidiyasa & Arifin 1544, L!); and Mt. Muruk Miau (2083 m) of the Meligan Range near Long Pasia in Sabah, which also hosts a putative hybrid with
N. veitchii
View in CoL
, a species
N. mollis
View in CoL
co-occurs with ( Hiew 1992, Maik Miki pers. comm., 2019).
The known distributions of
Nepenthes fractiflexa
and
N. mollis
tend south-westward and north-eastward, respectively ( Fig. 2
View FIGURE 2
). This pattern may perhaps reflect edaphic heterogeneity: of Bukit Pagon, Mt. Lumarku, Mt. Murud, the Meligan Range and the Kemul Massif—all known to harbour only
N. mollis
—the first four are sandstone formations, while the last is a chimaeric non-lateritic peak, whereas
N. fractiflexa
has been recorded exclusively from surface laterites (Batu Buli, Hose Mountains, and Mt. Bagong) or else as an epiphyte (Batu Lawi, Mt. Bagong, and Mt. Mulu) (AR, JDW, MB, MD pers. observ.; see Tate 2001, Hutchison 2005, Lamb et al. 2009). A hydrological cause seems unlikely given the parallel habitats of the two species. Indeed, since the distributions of
N. fractiflexa
and
N. mollis
are so incompletely known this apparent pattern may be wholly artefactual.