Allium webbii Clementi (1857: 327)

Idrees, Muhammad & Shaw, Julian M. H., 2022, Nomenclature notes on two names in Allium (Amaryllidaceae), Phytotaxa 566 (1), pp. 140-142 : 140-141

Allium webbii Clementi (1857: 327)

Type (lectotype, designated here):— TURKEY. Crescit in Lapidosis alpinis Olympi Bith., 14 August 1850, Clementi s.n. ( FL011990 !; isolectotypes: BM001066441 !, E00344665 !, G00165106 !, LE00010864 !, LE00010865 !, S06-4199 !) .

≡ Allium flavum var. minus Boissier (1882: 255) ≡ Allium minus (Boiss.) Koçyiğit & Özhatay, Bot. Chron. (Patras) 22: 79, 80. (2019) comb. inval., non A. minus ( Yu et al. 1981: 32) Choi & Oh (2010: 200) .

Type (first-step lectotype, designated by Kollmann 1984: 150):— TURKEY. Regione alpina Olympi Bithyni (Ulu Dag), 14 August 1850, Clementi s.n. (E, G, K) . Second-step lectotype, designated here:— TURKEY. Regione alpina Olympi Bithyni (Ulu Dag), 14 August 1850, Clementi s.n. (FL011990! ; isolectotypes: BM001066441!, E00344665!, G00165106!, LE00010864!, LE00010865!, S06-4199!) .

Note:— Kollmann (1984: 150), designated a collection as a lectotype for A. flavum var. minus Boissier (1882: 255) citing E, G, K, without specifying a herbarium sheet. The specimen in FL (barcode 011990) is designated here as the lectotype [second-step], according to Art. 9.17 of the ICN ( Turland et al. 2019). We choose to lectotypify A. webbii with the same collection as the type for A. flavum var. minus to ensure consistency in the application of these names.