Cacostola simplex ( Pascoe, 1859 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.3676627 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0F4263E0-1CBC-4046-95C8-74FDBD6D4325 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3681505 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4836E338-FFCD-B905-FF2D-FDE8FDA4FB1F |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Cacostola simplex ( Pascoe, 1859 ) |
status |
|
Cacostola simplex ( Pascoe, 1859) View in CoL
( Fig. 44 View Figures 38–44 )
Pachypeza simplex Pascoe 1859: 55 View in CoL ; Nearns et al. 2014: 265 (holotype).
Cacostola simplex View in CoL ; Bates 1866: 31; Thomson 1868: 68; Lacordaire 1872: 687; Prudhomme 1906: 36 (distr.); Aurivillius 1923: 352 (cat.); Blackwelder 1946: 605 (checklist); Dillon and Dillon 1946: 262; Breuning 1949: 27 (syn.); Buck 1959: 601 (distr.); Marinoni and Martins 1982: 247 (reval.); Monné and Giesbert 1994: 195 (checklist); Monné 1994: 36 (cat.); 2005: 538 (cat.); Monné and Hovore 2006: 275 (checklist); Monné et al. 2012: 43 (distr.); Morvan and Roguet 2013: 29 (distr.); Monné 2018: 730 (cat.).
Trestonia simplex View in CoL ; Gemminger 1873: 3128 (cat.).
According to Marinoni and Martins (1982) (translated): “The holotype of C. simplex View in CoL has features (especially those referring to pronotal pubescence) that allow identifying it as a distinct species from volvula View in CoL and, accordingly must be revalidated.” We do not see significant differences in the pronotal pubescence of those two species. However, the distance between the upper eye lobes is distinctly greater in P. volvula View in CoL (larger than three times width of one lobe ( Fig. 5 View Figures 1–10 )) than in C. simplex View in CoL ( Fig. 44 View Figures 38–44 ) (slightly narrower than twice width of one lobe) and the width of the upper eye lobes is wider in C. simplex View in CoL ( Fig. 44 View Figures 38–44 ) than in C. volvula View in CoL ( Fig. 5 View Figures 1–10 ) thus are character differences that do support the revalidation of C. simplex View in CoL by Marinoni and Martins (1982).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cacostola simplex ( Pascoe, 1859 )
Wappes, James E. & Santos-Silva, Antonio 2019 |
Trestonia simplex
Gemminger, M. 1873: 3128 |
Cacostola simplex
Monne, M. A. 2018: 730 |
Morvan, O. & J. - P. Roguet 2013: 29 |
Monne, M. A. & E. H. Nearns & S. H. Carbonel Carril & I. P. Swift & M. L. Monne 2012: 43 |
Monne, M. A. & F. T. Hovore 2006: 275 |
Monne, M. A. 2005: 538 |
Monne, M. A. & E. F. Giesbert 1994: 195 |
Monne, M. A. 1994: 36 |
Marinoni, R. C. & U. R. Martins 1982: 247 |
Buck, P. 1959: 601 |
Breuning, S. 1949: 27 |
Blackwelder, R. E. 1946: 605 |
Dillon, L. S. & E. S. Dillon 1946: 262 |
Aurivillius, C. 1923: 352 |
Prudhomme, F. 1906: 36 |
Lacordaire, J. T. 1872: 687 |
Thomson, J. 1868: 68 |
Bates, H. W. 1866: 31 |
Pachypeza simplex
Nearns, E. H. & M. V. L. Barclay & G. L. Tavakilian 2014: 265 |
Pascoe, F. P. 1859: 55 |