Neostasina maisi, Rheims & Alayón, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.821.1805 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B4D2076B-4256-4BA2-B07F-A80C6A9CFCBA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6611121 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1CA9AFFC-3FD1-4A3A-9755-BE4B998212D9 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:1CA9AFFC-3FD1-4A3A-9755-BE4B998212D9 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Neostasina maisi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Neostasina maisi View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:1CA9AFFC-3FD1-4A3A-9755-BE4B998212D9
Figs 9−11 View Fig View Fig View Fig , 18 View Fig
Diagnosis
Males of N. maisi sp. nov. are distinguished from all congeners by the palps with TBE bifid, with longer branch filiform and the other small and thorn-like ( Fig. 11 View Fig B−C). Females resemble those of N. baoruco ( Rheims & Alayón 2016: fig. 23) by the epigyne with ar divided and MS roughly triangular. They are distinguished from the latter species by the spermathecae anteriorly globose with smooth lateral margins ( Fig 11A View Fig ) (inverted U-shaped with outer lateral margins bearing indentations in N. baoruco ).
Etymology
The specific name refers to the type locality; noun in apposition.
Material examined
Holotype CUBA • 1 ♂; Guantanamo Province, Maisí [20.2667, 74.2000]; Punta de Maisí ; 8 Aug. 1998; A. Sanchéz leg.; MNHNCu. GoogleMaps
Paratypes CUBA • 2 ♀♀; same collection data as for holotype; MNHNCu GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (holotype)
COLOR. Prosoma pale brownish orange; cephalic region with pale brown lines extending posteriorly from PME and PLE; thoracic region darker along thoracic striae, with thin brown lines extending from fovea to lateral margins; fovea brown; eye borders black. Chelicerae slightly darker than prosoma. Legs and palps lighter than prosoma. Labium brown distally pale brown. Endites pale brown distally yellowish cream colored. Opisthosoma yellowish cream colored; dorsally with brown pattern of irregular elongated marks laterally, four pairs of irregularly rounded marks around cardiac mark and six median chevrons down posterior half; ventrally with few elongated marks laterally and few scattered spots. Spinnerets yellowish cream colored ( Fig. 9 View Fig A−B).
MEASUREMENTS. Total length 8.4, prosoma length 4.4, width 3.8, opisthosoma length 3.8, width 2.5. Eye diameters: 0.30, 0.25, 0.20, 0.25; interdistances: 0.18, 0.14, 0.30, 0.32, 0.15, 0.09. Legs: I: 15.7 (4.4, 2.3, 4.0, 4.0, 1.0); II: 16.4 (4.8, 2.4, 4.2, 4.0, 1.0); III: 12.8 (4.0, 2.0, 2.9, 3.0, 0.9); IV: absent.
PALP. VTA reduced to small medial bump; vRTA as large as dRTA fin-shaped in ventral view, clubshaped in retrolateral view; dRTA tapering in ventral view; cymbium bulging retrolaterally; bulb with pt at 7 o’clock position; E arising from tegulum at 8−9 o’clock position; TBC massive, thumb-shaped; MA arising from tegulum at 4 o’clock position; C with the same width throughout its entire length ( Figs 10 View Fig A−C, 11A−D).
Female (paratype)
COLOR. Coloration pattern as in male; prosoma, chelicerae, legs and palps darker ( Fig. 9 View Fig C−D).
MEASUREMENTS. Total length 13.9; prosoma length 5.1, width 4.4; opisthosoma length 8.4, width 5.0. Eye diameters: 0.32, 0.25, 0.21, 0.26; interdistances: 0.20, 0.25, 0.42, 0.45, 0.19, 0.12. Legs (2413): I: 15.1 (4.3, 2.5, 3.9, 3.5, 0.9); II: 15.7 (4.6, 2.5, 4.0, 3.7, 0.9); III: 12.9 (4.1, 2.1, 2.9, 3.0, 0.8); IV: 15.5 (4.7, 2.0, 3.6, 4.2, 1.0).
EPIGYNE. EF longer than wide; ar gently curved; MS wider than long with posterior margin rounded, slightly surpassing tips of posterior projections of LL ( Figs 10D View Fig , 11E View Fig ).
VULVA. GP rounded, slightly wider than long, postero-mediad; FD hook-shaped, postero-mediad ( Figs 10E View Fig , 11 View Fig F−G).
Variation
Two females: total length 13.9−14.3; prosoma length 5.1−6.4.
Distribution
Only known from the type locality in Guantanamo province, Cuba ( Fig. 18 View Fig )
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |