Mus (Nannomys) bufo Thomas 1906
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7316535 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11335047 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/45E03240-61A8-EA35-F908-38ECDA4B2E91 |
treatment provided by |
Guido |
scientific name |
Mus (Nannomys) bufo Thomas 1906 |
status |
|
Mus (Nannomys) bufo Thomas 1906 View in CoL
Mus (Nannomys) bufo Thomas 1906 View in CoL , Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, 18: 145.
Type Locality: Uganda, Ruwenzori East, 6000 ft (1830 m).
Vernacular Names: Toad Mouse.
Synonyms: Mus (Nannomys) ablutus G. M. Allen and Loveridge 1939 ; Mus (Nannomys) wambutti (Lönnberg and Gyldenstolpe 1925) .
Distribution: E Dem. Rep. Congo (Kivu region), adjacent Uganda, Rwanda, and Burundi; a montane Western Rift endemic.
Conservation: IUCN – Lower Risk (lc).
Discussion: Subgenus Nannomys . In body size and morphology, M. bufo superficially resembles the large-bodied M. triton , but they are distinguished by dental traits and tail length (F. Petter and Matthey, 1975) as well as karyotypes ( Robbins and Baker, 1978), and occur together in the Kivu region of E Dem. Rep. Congo (specimens in AMNH). Electrophoretic analysis of 19 protein enzymes at 24 loci indicated M. bufo to be more closely related to M. gratus (= M. minutoides ) than to M. triton ( Van Rompaey et al., 1984) . Chromosomal data for Burundi samples reported by Maddalena et al. (1989). Altitudinal distribution on Ugandan slopes of Ruwenzori Mtns reviewed by Kerbis Peterhans et al. (1998); documented from Kalinzu Forest in SW Uganda by Lunde and Sarmiento (2002), and from Kibale Forest by Hoffmann (1997).
AMNH |
American Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.