Stenosigma testaceum ( Fox, 1899 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4455.3.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:60763C18-3E38-452C-9019-F16863B3106D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5952289 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/432B8793-FFCE-FFD1-FF76-84C2FB71FBEE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Stenosigma testaceum ( Fox, 1899 ) |
status |
|
Stenosigma testaceum ( Fox, 1899)
( Figs. 7 View FIGURES 7–12. 7 , 14, 17 View FIGURES 13–18. 13, 14 , 24 View FIGURES 19–24. 19 , 27 View FIGURES 25–30. 25–27 )
Eumenes testaceus FOX, 1899: 438
Eumenes testaceus ; ZaVattari, 1912: 83. BertOni, 1934: 114, 122. Carpenter & Van der Vecht, 1991: 224 (designatiOn Of lectOtype).
Stenosigma testaceum ; GiOrdani SOika, 1990: 148, 149. Hermes et al., 2014: 456, 482, 483, 484. Hermes & Ferreira, 2016: 123.
Type data: Lectotype male (CMNH).
Examined.
Type locality: Santarém , Brazil.
Comments and Diagnosis. Stenosigma testaceum is morphologically similar to S. imitans , but clypeal features distinguish these two species. While specimens of S. imitans have a short clypeus without evident carinae ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 7–12. 7 ), specimens of S. testaceum present a longer clypeus with developed teeth with apical carinae ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 13–18. 13, 14 ). In addition to the clypeus condition, S. testaceum is easily recognized by its predominantly yellowish body color ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 7–12. 7 ); presence of a developed lamella in the pronotal carina ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 13–18. 13, 14 ); and the humeral region scarcely developed, without an evident projection ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 19–24. 19 ).
Type Material. Brasil, Santarém: lectotype ♂ ( CMNH), ‘Santarem’ ‘ Eumenes \ testacea\ type Fox’ (handwritten label) ‘ LECTOTYPE ♂ \ Eumenes \ tescea Fox, 1889\ des. Carpenter & Vecht’; paralectotype ♀ ( CMNH), ‘Santarem’ ‘ Eumenes \ testacea\ Type Fox’ (handwritten label) ‘ PARALECTOTYPE ♀ \ Eumenes \ testacea Fox, 1899 \ des. Carpenter & Vetch’; paralectotype ♂ ( CMNH), ‘Santarem’ ‘ PARALECTOTYPE \ Eumenes \ testacea Fox, 1899 \ des. Carpenter & Vetch’.
Additional material examined. Brasil, Amazonas: 1 ♀ (UNESP), ‘Brazil, AM, Manaus\ Reserva Ducke\ 2°58’46’’S/59°56’49’’W\ 09.vii.2013 —Coleta ativa\ Somavilla, A. col.’ ‘ Stenosigma ♀\ testaceum (Fox) \ Y. C. Grandinete det 2014’ ‘EUM 0515’; 1 ♂ (UNESP), ‘Brazil, AM, Manaus\ Reserva Ducke\ 2°58’46’’S/59°56’49’’W\ 09.vii.2013 —Coleta ativa\ Somavilla, A. col.’ ‘EUM 0438’; 1 ♂ (UNESP), ‘Brazil, AM, Manaus\ Reserva Ducke\ 2°58’46’’S/59°56’49’’W\ 09.vii.2013 —Coleta ativa\ Somavilla, A. col.’ ‘EUM 0439’. Brasil, Ceará: 1 ♀ (MPEG), ‘Ceará, Serra\ de Batureté\ 700m 18-7-08 \ Ducke’ (handwritten label) ‘Brazil\ Estado do\ Ceará’ ‘Coleção\ Ducke’ ‘ Stenosigma ♀’ (handwritten label) ‘Goeldi 0004’. Brasil, Pará: 1 ♀ (IBNPY), ‘...’ (unreadable label) ‘Brazil\ Estado do Pará’ ‘ Pachymenes ♀\ testaceum Fox \ det. Ducke 1912’ ‘MNHP\ A. W. Bertoni\ F. 179\ Garcete rev.’ ‘0061’ (back of the label) ‘Compared with\ Paratype’ ‘IBNPY-INVERT\ 000000007686’ ‘ Stenosigma \ testaceum \ det. B. Garcete 1997’; 1 ♀ (MPEG), ‘Obidos\ 1904’ ‘Brazil\ Estado do\ Pará’ ‘Coleção\ Ducke’ ‘MPEG HYM\ 11061782 ’ ‘Pirhosigma sp.’ (handwritten label) ‘Pirhosigma sp.’ (handwritten label) ‘Goeldi 0005’; 1 ♂ (MPEG), ‘Brazil\ Estado do\ Pará’ ‘R. Tapajós\ Itartuba\ 2.9.1902 \ Ducke’ ‘Coleção\ Ducke’ ‘ Stenosigma sp’ ‘Goeldi 0003’; 1 ♂ (MPEG), ‘Faro\ 19.2.1910 \ Ducke’ ‘Brazil\ Estado do\ Pará’ ‘Coleção\ Ducke’ ‘ Stenosigma sp.’ (handwritten label) ‘Goeldi 0002’. Brasil, Rondônia: 1 ♀ (UNESP), ‘Itapuã do Oeste-RO-\ Brasil\ Flor: Nac. do Jamari\ 29/ ix / 2012 \ Gomes, B. col.’ ‘ Stenosigma testaceum \ ( Fox, 1899) ♀\ Y. C. Grandinete det. 2013’; 1 ♀ (UNESP), ‘Porto Velho-RP-\ Brasil\ Univ. Fed. De Rondônia\ 30/ xi/ 2012 \ Gomes, B. col.’ ‘ Stenosigma testaceum \ ( Fox, 1899) ♀\ Y. C. Grandinete det. 2013’; 1 ♂ (UNESP), ‘Itapuã do Oeste-RO-Brasil\ Flor. Nac. do Jamari\ 28/x/2012 (Liq.\ atrativo)\ Stenosigma sp ♂’. Peru, Madre de Dios: 1 ♀ (AMNH), ‘PERU: Madre de Dios\ Tambopata Wild. Res.\ 12°51’S, 69°17’W, 290m.\ 22–25 January, 1985\ J. Carpenter & D. Bowers’ ‘ Stenosigma aff ♀\ testaceum’ ‘AMNH 0016’. Suriname, Brownsberg: 1 ♀ (AMNH), ‘SURINAME: Brownsberg\ Natuurpark, Elev. 500m \ 4 58’, 55 11’\ 20 Feb. 1982 \ James M. Carpenter’ ‘ Stenosigma aff\ testaceum’ ‘AMNH 0018’. Peru, Madre de Dios: 1 ♂ (AMNH), ‘PERU: Madre de Dios\ Tambopata Wild. Res.\ 12°51’S, 69°17’W, 290m.\ 22–25 January, 1985\ J. Carpenter & D. Bowers’ ‘ Stenosigma aff ♂\ testaceum’ ‘AMNH 0017’ (back of the label). Guiana, Tumatumari: 1 ♂ (AMNH), ‘Tumatumari\ Portaro R.\ BR. GUIANE\ Jun. 28.27’ (partially handwritten label). Brazil, Amazonas: 1 ♀ (INPA), ‘BRASIL, AM, Manaus,\ Reserva F. Adolpho Ducke\ 04–11.x.2010 \ Somavilla, A., et al. Leg. ’ ‘Grade do PPBio\ NS3 (LO7/LO8)\ Vespidae—Eumeninae ’ ‘ Stenosigma ♀\ testaceum (Fox) \ Grandinete, Y. C. det. 2014’ (handwritten label) ‘INPA 0015’. Brazil, Amazonas: 1 ♀ (INPA): ‘Brasil—AM\ PARNA do Jaú\ 10–24 Nov2003 ’ ‘M. L. Oliveira &\ J. A. Cunha leg.\ Vila\ Seringalzinho’ ‘ Stenosigma \ testaceum (Fox) \ M. G. Hermes det. 2008’ (partially handwritten label) ‘INPA0016’. Brazil, Amazonas: 1 ♂ (INPA), ‘BRASIL, AM, Manaus,\ Reserva F. Adolpho Ducke\ 10–16.viii.2010 \ Somavilla, A., et al. Leg. ’ ‘Grade do PPBio\ NS2 (LO3/LO4)\ Vespidae—Eumeninae’ ‘ Stenosigma \ testaceum \ Somavilla, A. 2011 (det.)’ (partially handwritten label) ‘INPA0017’.
Collecting Records. Brazil (Pará, Amazonas, Ceará, Rondônia), Suriname, Guiana, Peru.
CMNH |
The Cleveland Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Stenosigma testaceum ( Fox, 1899 )
Ferreira, Wellington D., De Oliveira, Letícia A. & Hermes, Marcel G. 2018 |
Eumenes testaceus
FOX, 1899 : 438 |
Eumenes testaceus
ZaVattari, 1912 : 83 |
BertOni, 1934 : 114 |
Stenosigma testaceum
GiOrdani SOika, 1990 : 148 |
Hermes et al., 2014 : 456 |
Hermes & Ferreira, 2016 : 123 |