Neocephalosphaera sumapazensis, Ramos-Pastrana & Marques & Rafael, 2022

Ramos-Pastrana, Yardany, Marques, Dayse W. A. & Rafael, José Albertino, 2022, Cephalosphaera Enderlein and Neocephalosphaera De Meyer (Diptera: Pipunculidae) of Colombia, with description of nine new species and an updated key to their Neotropical species, Zootaxa 5178 (4), pp. 301-333 : 323-324

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5178.4.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6E706C39-8F42-4050-8792-0423F4267D2B

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7037029

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/41113E13-FF94-FFCA-FF12-915F4D4FB527

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Neocephalosphaera sumapazensis
status

sp. nov.

Neocephalosphaera sumapazensis View in CoL sp. nov.

Figs 114–128 View FIGURES 114–125 View FIGURES 126–128 , 131 View FIGURE 131

Type material. HOLOTYPE ♂: COLOMBIA, Meta, PNN[Parque Nacional Natural] Sumapaz, Cabaña Las Mirias , 348’N / 7353’W, 735 m [eters], 19.ix–4.x.2003, Malaise, H. Vargas & A. Torrijos Leg. “M4343 (1♂, IAvH) (photographed specimen). PARATYPES idem, Bolívar, SFF[Santuario de Fauna y Flora] Los Colorados, Alto el Mirador, 954’N / 757’W, 400 m [eters], 3–18.vii.2001, Malaise, E. Deulufeut Leg. “M1951 (1♀, IAvH) (photographed specimen) . Holotype with left wing mounted on microslide with Canada balsam. Terminalia was placed in a microvial with glycerin, pinned along the specimen. Antenna lost.

Diagnosis. Fore and hind coxa whitish yellow; mid coxa brown; fore and hind trochanters whitish yellow; mid trochanter dark yellow; femora dark yellow, fore and mid femora with proximal quarter whitish yellow; hind femur with proximal half whitish yellow; tibiae light yellow. Surstyli subsymmetrical, setose, both surstyli downward directed. Phallic guide short, with apex thin and downward directed. Phallus bifid, with ejaculatory ducts long and thin, covered by a modified membrane.

Description. MALE. (holotype). Body length 5.9 mm. Head ( Figs 114–115 View FIGURES 114–125 ). Eyes contiguous for 30 facets. F, EM, V (mm) = 0.4, 0.8, 0.3. Frons gray pruinose. Postcranium brown, gray pruinose. Antenna (lost). Thorax ( Figs 115–116 View FIGURES 114–125 ). Postpronotal lobe light brown. Scutum dark brown to black, brown pruinose, except the basal central half yellow pruinose. Notopleuron dark yellow, yellow pruinose. Scutellum concolorous with notopleuron, light brown pruinose. Mesopleuron dark yellow, gray pruinose. Mediotergite light brown, gray pruinose. Wing ( Fig. 117 View FIGURES 114–125 ). Length 7.6 mm. LW/MWW = 3.1; LTC/LFC = 0.7. Membrane faintly brown infuscated; third section costal shorter than the length of fourth; vein r-m located before the basal third of the upper section of the cell dm; vein M 2 long; dm-m/M 2 = 2.4; section between cell dm and vein M 2 smaller than vein dm-m; vein dm-m curved. Halter stem beige, base brown, knob beige with a brown spot dorsally. Legs ( Figs 114–115 View FIGURES 114–125 ). Fore and hind coxae whitish yellow; mid coxa brown; fore and hind trochanters whitish yellow; mid trochanter dark yellow; femora dark yellow; fore and mid femora with proximal quarter whitish yellow; hind femur with proximal half whitish yellow; femora with rows of ventral spines and a row of long and fine yellow setae posterodorsally; tibiae light yellow; tarsomeres 1–2 dark yellow; 3–5 light brown; pulvilli whitish yellow. Abdomen ( Figs 114–115, 118 View FIGURES 114–125 ). Yellow, tergite 1 yellow, gray pruinose, without setae laterally; tergite 2–4 dark yellow, with a T-shaped spot, darker at the base and medially, sparsely gray pruinose at bases; tergites and sternites 6 and 7 as in Fig. 119 View FIGURES 114–125 . Syntergosternite 8 dark yellow, yellow pruinose, almost equal in length to tergite 5, with membranous area large, dividing syntergosternite 8 and reaching epandrium ( Figs 118, 120 View FIGURES 114–125 ). Terminalia ( Figs 119–125 View FIGURES 114–125 ). Epandrium and surstyli yellow ( Figs 120–121 View FIGURES 114–125 ). Surstyli ( Figs 120–123 View FIGURES 114–125 ) subsymmetrical, shorter than length to epandrium, setose, both surstyli downward directed, thickened at the base, thin apically, with tips downward directed; right surstylus with six long and fine setae on external margin, right surstylus slightly longer than left, with subapical sinus, left surstylus with a distinct submedian lobe; both surstyli downward directed when seen in lateral view ( Figs 122–123 View FIGURES 114–125 ). Apex of phallic guide short, with apex thin and downward directed ( Fig. 124 View FIGURES 114–125 ). Ejaculatory apodeme fan-shaped ( Fig. 125 View FIGURES 114–125 ). Phallus bifid, with ejaculatory ducts long and thin, apparently covered by a membrane (broken) ( Fig. 124 View FIGURES 114–125 )

FEMALE. ( Figs 126–128 View FIGURES 126–128 ). Similar to male, differing in the following aspects. Body length 5.8 mm. Eyes dichoptic. Tergites 2–4 light yellow. Wing length 4.3 mm. LW/MWW = 3.3. LTC/LFC = 0.8. Frontal ommatidia larger than adjacent. Ovipositor OL: 1. mm, PL: 0.62 mm, B: 0.47 mm; base dark yellow, gray pruinose; piercer dark yellow, except base light brown, apex shiny, and straight ( Figs 127–128 View FIGURES 126–128 ).

Geographical distribution. Colombia (Bolívar, Meta) ( Fig. 131 View FIGURE 131 ).

Etymology. The specific epithet refers to the type locality, Sumapaz, National Natural Park, Colombia.

Habitat. The specimens were collected with Malaise traps at ground level at the areas of tropical forest in the Orinoco region and tropical dry forest in the Caribbean region Colombia.

Taxonomic notes. Based on male specimen N. sumapazensis sp. nov. is similar in appearance to N. miriamae Rafael, 1992 (see figures 42.9, 42.22, 42.57, 42.58, presented by Rafael (1992) and figures 1.H, 2.K, 3.K, presented by Souza & Ale-Rocha (2009), N. semispiralis Rafael & Rosa, 1991 [see figures 7–11, presented by Rafael & Rosa (1991) and figures 1.N, 3.Q, presented by Souza & Ale-Rocha (2009)], and N. spinifera sp. nov. ( Figs 85–97 View FIGURES 85–97 ). It differs from N. miriamae by having the postpronotal lobe light brown ( Figs 114, 116 View FIGURES 114–125 ) (versus postpronotal lobe yellow in N. miriamae ); scutellum dark yellow, light brown pruinose ( Figs 115–116 View FIGURES 114–125 ) (versus scutellum dark brown to black, gray-brown pruinose); vein r-m located before the basal third of the upper section of the cell dm ( Fig. 117 View FIGURES 114–125 ) [versus vein r-m located after the basal third of the upper section of the cell dm, figure 42.22, presented by Rafael (1992)]; section between cell dm and vein M 2 smaller than vein dm-m ( Fig. 117 View FIGURES 114–125 ) [versus section between cell dm and vein M 2 equal than vein dm-m, figure 42.22, presented by Rafael (1992)]; fore and hind coxae whitish yellow, mid coxa brown (versus all coxae black); mid trochanter dark yellow (versus mid trochanter black); both surstyli with tips downward directed ( Fig. 121 View FIGURES 114–125 ) [versus both surstyli with tips inward directed, figure 42.57 presented by Rafael (1992)]; both surstyli with one small lobe ventrally in the middle third when seen in lateral view ( Figs 122–123 View FIGURES 114–125 ) [versus left surstylus with subapical sinus ventrally in the proximal third when seen in lateral view, figure 42.58, presented by Rafael (1992)]. It differs from N. semispiralis by having postpronotal lobe light brown ( Figs 114–116 View FIGURES 114–125 ) (versus postpronotal lobe yellow in N. semispiralis ); wing with membrane faintly brown infuscate ( Fig. 117 View FIGURES 114–125 ) (versus wing with membrane hyaline); the section between cell dm and vein M 2 smaller than vein dmm ( Fig. 117 View FIGURES 114–125 ) (versus section between cell dm and vein M 2 greater than vein dm-m); mid coxa brown (versus mid coxa black); mid trochanter yellow (versus mid trochanter black); both surstyli with one small lobe ventrally in the middle third when seen in lateral view ( Figs 122–123 View FIGURES 114–125 ) [versus both with two ventral lobes when seen in lateral view, figures 9–10 presented by Rafael & Rosa (1991)]. It differs from N. spinifera sp. nov. by having the postpronotal lobe light brown ( Figs 114, 116 View FIGURES 114–125 ) [versus postpronotal lobe whitish yellow in N. spinifera sp. nov. ( Fig. 85 View FIGURES 85–97 )]; scutellum dark yellow ( Figs 115–116 View FIGURES 114–125 ) [versus scutellum whitish yellow ( Figs 86, 88 View FIGURES 85–97 )]; the section between cell dm and vein M 2 smaller than vein dm-m ( Fig. 117 View FIGURES 114–125 ) [versus section between cell dm and vein M 2 greater than vein dm-m ( Fig. 89 View FIGURES 85–97 )]; both surstyli with tips downward directed ( Fig. 121 View FIGURES 114–125 ) [versus both surstyli with tips outward directed ( Fig. 93 View FIGURES 85–97 )]; both surstyli with one small lobe ventrally in the middle third when seen in lateral view ( Figs 122–123 View FIGURES 114–125 ) [versus both surstyli with one small lobe ventrally in the proximal third when seen in lateral view ( Figs 94–95 View FIGURES 85–97 )]; ejaculatory apodeme fan-shaped, with two lateral margins acute ( Fig. 125 View FIGURES 114–125 ) [versus ejaculatory apodeme fan-shaped, with one lateral margin rounded and other margin acute ( Fig. 97 View FIGURES 85–97 )].

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF