Hirschmanniella anchoryzae, Ebsary & Anderson 1982, Ebsary & Anderson, 1982
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4079.2.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:162312D2-32D7-4246-B5E8-7844BA349F79 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6063054 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/404887B6-FF91-2444-A9B3-FD001943FBCE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hirschmanniella anchoryzae |
status |
|
1. H. anchoryzae Ebsary & Anderson 1982
(Pourjam et al. 2000) 4♀: L= 1620 (1585–1680) µm; a = 69.5 (67–73); b = 10.6 (10.2–10.8); b' = 5.5 (4.9–6.2); c = 15 (14.6–15.2); c' = 6.4 (6.1–7); St = 18 (16–19) µm; V = 50.6 (49–51)
3♂: L= 1905 (1565–2130) µm; a = 72 (67–83); b = 11.4 (10.4–12.8); b' = 4.7 (4.1–5.8); c = 15.9 (11.6–18.5); c' = 7 (6–8.4); St = 19.8 (18–21) µm; Spicules = 39.8 (39–40) µm
Associated plant and locality. Cyperus rotundus L. (Hamedan).
References. Pourjam, E. et al., Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 1998, pers. com [P]; Pourjam et al. 2000 [F].
Remarks. The Iranian population of H. anchoryzae (Pourjam et al. 2000) closely corresponds to the original description ( Ebsary & Anderson 1982). However, in Iranian specimens the female has stylet length of 18 (16–19) µm vs 16–17 µm in the original description. Males differ from the original description in some characters such as: body length (1565–2130 vs 1116–1297 µm), a (67–83 vs 45–61), c´value (6–8.4 vs 4–5.8), stylet (18–21 vs 16 µm), and spicule (39–40 vs 28–31 µm).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |