Hirschmanniella anchoryzae, Ebsary & Anderson 1982, Ebsary & Anderson, 1982

Alvani, Somaye, Mahdikhani-Moghadam, Esmat, Rouhani, Hamid & Mohammadi, Abbas, 2016, A checklist of the family Pratylenchidae Thorne, 1949 from Iran, Zootaxa 4079 (2), pp. 179-204 : 183

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4079.2.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:162312D2-32D7-4246-B5E8-7844BA349F79

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6063054

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/404887B6-FF91-2444-A9B3-FD001943FBCE

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Hirschmanniella anchoryzae
status

 

1. H. anchoryzae Ebsary & Anderson 1982

(Pourjam et al. 2000) 4♀: L= 1620 (1585–1680) µm; a = 69.5 (67–73); b = 10.6 (10.2–10.8); b' = 5.5 (4.9–6.2); c = 15 (14.6–15.2); c' = 6.4 (6.1–7); St = 18 (16–19) µm; V = 50.6 (49–51)

3♂: L= 1905 (1565–2130) µm; a = 72 (67–83); b = 11.4 (10.4–12.8); b' = 4.7 (4.1–5.8); c = 15.9 (11.6–18.5); c' = 7 (6–8.4); St = 19.8 (18–21) µm; Spicules = 39.8 (39–40) µm

Associated plant and locality. Cyperus rotundus L. (Hamedan).

References. Pourjam, E. et al., Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 1998, pers. com [P]; Pourjam et al. 2000 [F].

Remarks. The Iranian population of H. anchoryzae (Pourjam et al. 2000) closely corresponds to the original description ( Ebsary & Anderson 1982). However, in Iranian specimens the female has stylet length of 18 (16–19) µm vs 16–17 µm in the original description. Males differ from the original description in some characters such as: body length (1565–2130 vs 1116–1297 µm), a (67–83 vs 45–61), c´value (6–8.4 vs 4–5.8), stylet (18–21 vs 16 µm), and spicule (39–40 vs 28–31 µm).

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF