Stenus viridanus, Champion, 1925
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4299.3.9 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0EAAEAF1-AC4B-4D65-AAEA-25F805319DA4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5073233 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3D7A878A-FF89-FFCF-A699-F89DFA6832F7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Stenus viridanus |
status |
|
Key to species of the Stenus viridanus View in CoL group from China
(Examining aedeagus is the most reliable way to identify species of S. viridanus complex.)
1 Pronotum with short but distinct setae, elytra without vorticose sculpture, eyltra wider with HW/EW=0.88–0.92, male sternite
IX and valvifers with apicolateral portion serrate, sclerotized spermatheca undetectable......... S. cyanogaster View in CoL complex...2 - Pronotum with extremely short and usually unnoticeable setae, elytra each with vorticose sculpture in posterial half, eyltra narrower with HW/EW=0.88–1.00, sternite IX and valvifers with long apicolateral projections, spermatheca sclerotized........................................................................................ S. viridanus View in CoL complex...3 2 Body with faint blue metallic tint, head with midline smooth, elytra relatively wider (HW/EW=0.98–1.05), elytral punctation more confluent, aedeagus as in Fig. 15 View FIGURES 11 – 17 A (in Rougemont, 1983)....................................... S.cyanogaster View in CoL
- Body with strong blue metallic tint, head with midline reticulated, elytra relatively narrower (HW/EW=1.05–1.10), elytral punctation less confluent, aedeagus as in Figs. 16, 17 View FIGURES 11 – 17 ............................................. S. panyuhongae View in CoL
3 Head distinctly narrower than elytra (HW/EW=0.88–0.95).....................................................4
- Head almost as wide as elytra............................................................................5
4 Elytra relatively larger (EL: 1.46–1.54 mm, EW: 1.40–1.44 mm), aedeagus as in Fig. 94 in Puthz, 2008, spermatheca as in Fig. 95 (in Puthz, 2008)........................................................................... S.viridivestis View in CoL
- Elytra relatively smaller (EL: 1.29–1.47 mm, EW: 1.22–1.37 mm), aedeagus as in Fig. 2 View FIGURE 1 – 6 A (in Zheng, 1992), spermatheca as in Fig. 2 View FIGURE 1 – 6 D (in Zheng, 1992)........................................................................ S.viridanus View in CoL
5 Punctation of pronotum and elytra more confluent, aedeagus as in Figs. 9, 10 View FIGURES 7 – 10 , female unknown.................. S. liuyei View in CoL
- Punctation of pronotum and elytra less confluent.............................................................6
6 Aedeagus (Fig. 97 in Puthz, 2008) with parameres distinctly longer than median lobe, median lobe with apical sclerotized area shorter, spermatheca as in Fig. 95 (in Puthz, 2008).................................................. S.viridicans View in CoL
- Aedeagus ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 1 – 6 in Puthz, 1975) with parameres as long as median lobe, median lobe with apical sclerotized area longer, spermatheca as in Figs. 100, 101 (in Puthz, 2008).................................................... S. viridimicans View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |