Drimia Jacq. ex Willd., Sp. Pl.

Martínez-Azorín, Mario, Crespo, Manuel B., Alonso-Vargas, María Ángeles, Pinter, Michael, Crouch, Neil R., Dold, Anthony P., Mucina, Ladislav, Pfosser, Martin & Wetschnig, Wolfgang, 2023, A generic monograph of the Hyacinthaceae subfamily Urgineoideae, Phytotaxa 610 (1), pp. 1-143 : 35-41

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.610.1.1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8326673

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3C345D7B-FFC0-FFCD-FCA6-F82CB6F8FB4E

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Drimia Jacq. ex Willd., Sp. Pl.
status

 

5. Drimia Jacq. ex Willd., Sp. Pl. View in CoL View at ENA ed. 4, 2(1): 165 (1799) ( Figs 18–20 View FIGURE 18 View FIGURE 19 View FIGURE 20 ).

Typus generis:— Drimia elata Jacq. View in CoL

= Strepsiphyla Raf., Fl. Tellur. View in CoL 3: 60 (1837). Holotype:— S. villosa (Lindl.) Raf. View in CoL = Idothea Kunth, Enum. Pl. View in CoL [Kunth] 4: 341 (1843). Lectotype:— I. elata (Jacq.) Kunth View in CoL (designated by Stearn 1978: 203) ≡ Idothearia View in CoL C.Presl in Abh. K̂nigl. B̂hm. Ges. Wiss., ser. 5, 3: 544 (1845), nom. nov. illeg. [see Crespo et al. in Pl. Syst. Evol. 306: [Art. 67] 9 (2020)].

Description:—Bulbous geophyte. Bulb hypogeal or partly epigeal, ovoid to globose, variable in size, bulb scales usually compact or sometimes loose. Roots thickened and branched. Leaves 1 to several per bulb, commonly hysteranthous, rarely synanthous, with variable shape and morphology, from glabrous to long cilated or hairy, sometimes undulate. Inflorescence racemose, usually an elongated and multiflowered, 5‒100 cm long raceme, rarely compact and subcorymbose; peduncle terete, erect, smooth and glabrous; pedicels subpatent and usually curved, to 20 mm long. Bracts narrowly lanceolate, lowermost with distinct oblong spur, sometimes the bract and spur connected to peduncle by whitish membranous portion; bracteoles absent. Flowers stellate, erect-patent, diurnal, lasting 1‒2 days. Tepals 6, 10‒20 mm long, white, yellow, green, brown or purple, fused along basal third to form cylindrical tube, free perigone segments strongly reflexed and touching basal tube, narrowly lanceolate-oblong, with slightly wider and spatulate apex, with darker longitudinal band mostly visible on abaxial side. Stamens 6, erect and connivent to style, sometimes curved upwards; filaments narrowly triangular to filiform, smooth, adnate to perigone tube and arising from its mouth, rarely very shortly connate above perigone to form short filaments tube; anthers dehiscing by longitudinal slits along their whole length, yellowish, greenish or purplish. Ovary ovoid, trigonous, pale green to yellowish, well differentiated from style. Style narrow and long (much longer than ovary), erect. Stigma trigonous, papillose. Capsule ovoid, 7‒13 mm long, green first and papyraceous after ripening, valves completely dehiscing from base; tepals cohering and inrolled above ovary after anthesis, circumcissile from base and persisting as a cap at the top of developing capsules. Seeds subellipsoid to reniform, flattened with prominent central embryo and wide, flat wings, 5‒10 mm long, black to dark brown, with somewhat sinuous anticlinal testa cell walls.

Number of species and distribution:—The genus includes 19 described species distributed in Sub-Saharan Africa, with the center of diversty in the southwestern parts of South Africa and few species reaching East Africa and western Central Africa, restricted to the Cape, Karoo-Namib and Uzambara-Zululand Regions, and the Zambezian and Sahelo-Sudanian Subregions (sensu Takhtajan 1986 and Martínez-Azorín et al. 2023a) ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ). We consider the taxonomy of Drimia s.str. poor due to the lack of comprehensive studies covering its large distribution range. Further studies are needed, including of fresh material from the type localities of the described taxa, together with detailed morphological studies to ascertain the real number of existing taxa. In accepting very wide species concepts, which cover a large morphological variability, the treatments by Jessop (1977), Stedje (1987), and Manning & Goldblatt (2018) drastically reduced the number of accepted taxa in Southern and East Africa. We tentatively accept all described species in the genus based on their morphological differentiations. For further information on Drimia species see Jessop (1977) and Manning & Goldblatt (2018).

Karyology:—2n=18 ( Bruyns & Vosa 1987, as D. haworthioides Baker ; De Wet 1957, Fernandes & Neves 1962, as D. alta R.A.Dyer ; Bruyns & Vosa 1987, as D. ciliaris Jacq. ex Willd. ); 2n=20 ( De Wet 1957, as D. haworthioides ).

History, diagnostic characters, and taxonomic relationships:—Jacquin (1794, 1797) described and illustrated seven species of Drimia (nom. inval.). Among them, Drimia purpurascens Jacquin (1812: 48) and Drimia revoluta (Linnaeus f. 1782: 204) Sweet (1818: 72) , both currently placed in Squilla and Ledebouria Roth (1821: 124) , respectively ( Crespo et al. 2020). The remaining species constitute a compact group characterised by tepals basally connate in a distinct tube, the free portion of tepals elongated and narrowly lanceolate-oblong to subspatulate and strongly reflexed, and stamens adnate to the perigone, usually slightly curved and connivent to the style. Willdenow (1799) validated Drimia based on Jacquin’s descriptions and illustrations. This genus is the oldest in Urgineoideae and presented a homogeneous flower morphology in their original concept, with the exclusion of the two species mentioned above. However, with the description of further species in Drimia ( Baker 1871, 1897, 1898, Jessop 1977, Stedje 1987, Manning & Goldblatt 2003, 2007, Van Jaarsveld & Van Wyk 2005 ), its morphological circumscription became manifestly blurred. Although also based on other characters, this primarily stems from differing perceptions of the significance of the extent of tepal connation, from nearly free to connate in a distinct tube. This divergence in opinion introduced massive instability in generic circumscriptions in the Urgineoideae ( Huber 1969, Jessop 1977, Deb & Dasgupta 1982, Stedje 1987, 2001a, 2001b, Manning et al. 2004).

The phylogenetic studies by Martínez-Azorín et al. (2023a) include 17 samples of Drimia constituting a strongly supported clade, which is sister to a clade combining Litanthus and Schizobasis samples, with moderate support. The sister genera Litanthus and Schizobasis strongly differ in morphology, as shown below, further supporting the acceptance of Drimia in a narrow sense.

Accepted species:—

Drimia alta R.A.Dyer in Fl. Pl. South Africa 23: t. 890 (1943) ( Fig. 19.2 View FIGURE 19 ), nom. nov. ≡ Drimia altissima Hook.f. in Bot. Mag. 91: t. 5522 (1865) ( Fig. 19.1 View FIGURE 19 ), nom. illeg. [non Drimia altissima (L.f.) Ker Gawl. in Bot. Mag. 27: t. 1074 (1808)]. Type:— SOUTH AFRICA. Natal [KwaZulu-Natal], from John Sanderson of D’Urban [Durban]’, sub illustr. W. Fitch s.n. (K000257364! holo.).

Drimia burchellii Baker in Refug. Bot. [Saunders] 2: App. 2. (1870) ≡ Idothea burchellii (Baker) Kuntze, Revis. Gen. Pl. View in CoL 2: 712 (1891). Type:— SOUTH AFRICA. Cape [Eastern Cape], Uitenhage Div., between Galgebosch and Melkrivier, 17 February 1814, Burchell 4769 (K000857424! lecto. designated by Jessop in J. S. African Bot. 43: 285. 1977; TCD?isolecto. [as Burchell “4969”]).

Drimia ciliaris Jacq. ex Willd., Sp. Pl. View in CoL 2: 165 (1799) ≡ Hyacinthus ciliaris (Jacq. ex Willd.) Poir. in Lam., Encycl., Suppl. 3: 120 (1813) ≡ Idothea ciliaris (Jacq. ex Willd.) Kunth, Enum. Pl. View in CoL 4: 343 (1843). Type:—illustration in Jacq., Icon. Pl. Rar. 2 (16): t. 377 (1795) ( Fig. 18.1 View FIGURE 18 ) (lecto. designated as “ type ” by Jessop in J. S. African Bot. 43: 284 1977).

Drimia concolor Baker View in CoL in J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 11: 422 (1871) ≡ Idothea concolor (Baker) Kuntze, Revis. Gen. Pl. View in CoL 2: 712 (1891). Type:— SOUTH AFRICA. Cap. B. Spei (e tab. ex exemplo in Hort. Kew. anno 1823 culto depicta descript) [ Manning & Goldblatt (2018) cited that the “ holotype ” was presumably at K, though we did not find there any material fitting the protologue].

Drimia eckloniana Schult.f., Syst. Veg. , ed. 15 bis [Roemer & Schultes] 7(2): 1710 (1830) = Drimia humilis Berg. ex Eckl., Topogr. Verz. Pflanzensamml. Ecklon View in CoL : 2 (1827), nom. nud. ≡ Drimia humilis Berg. ex Kunth, Enum. Pl. View in CoL 4: 344 (1843), nom. inval. [in syn.] ≡ Idothea humilis Kunth, Enum. Pl. View in CoL 4: 344 (1843), nom. illeg. superfl. Type:— SOUTH AFRICA. In arenosis Prom. B. Spei., Ecklon s.n. Drimia No. 89 [Manning & Goldblatt in Strelitzia 40: 50 (2018) designated this collection as “holo.”, which was supposedly kept at B; however the collection is not extant at B (R. Vogt pers. comm.) and therefore, a new type is needed; Lecto. designated here:—HAL108222! lecto.].

Drimia elata Jacq. ex Willd., Sp. Pl. View in CoL 2: 165 (1799) ≡ Hyacinthus elatus (Jacq. ex Willd.) Poir. in Lam, Encycl., Suppl. 3: 120 (1813) ≡ Idothea elata (Jacq. ex Willd.) Kunth, Enum. Pl. View in CoL 4: 343 (1843) ( Figs 1.19 View FIGURE 1 , 18.2 View FIGURE 18 , 20.1 View FIGURE 20 ). Type:—illustration in Jacq., Icon. Pl. Rar. 2 (15): t. 373 (1794) ( Fig. 18.2 View FIGURE 18 ) (lecto. designated by Stedje & Thulin in Nordic J. Bot. 15: 597. 1995).

Drimia elgonica Bullock View in CoL in Bull. Misc. Inform. Kew 1932(10): 504 (1932). Type:— KENYA. Mt. Elgon , elev. 6900 ft., 15 March 1931, E.J. Major & C. Lugard 563 (K000257336! holo.).

Drimia haworthioides Baker in Gard. Chron. (1875) 1: 366 (1875) ( Figs 1.20 View FIGURE 1 , 20.2 View FIGURE 20 ). Type:— SOUTH AFRICA. Eastern Cape. Graaff-Reinet (3224): near Graaff-Reinet , (–BC), Flowers in December 1874 and leaves in February 1875 [ex hort. Kew], Bolus (lecto. designated here: The illustration in the protologue, Fig. 70 View FIGURE 70 “bulb of Drimia haworthioides ”). Epitype (designated here):—K000857416! epi.). Note :— There are two specimens at Kew mounted on the same voucher (K000857415! and K000857416!) including fragments of plants that apparently correspond to the type collection (Bolus 2040). However, those fragments were apparently gathered at different times from plants grown at Kew. The voucher K000857415 includes a bulb resembling the illustration in the protologue, considered to come from the “type plant” that was gathered 23 Dec 1879 and annotated by R. Brown. The voucher K000857416 was regarded as “ holotype ” (to be corrected to lectotype) of this name by Manning & Goldblatt (2018: 57), and includes two fragments (a bulb and a flowering scape) belonging to two different collections and they are associated to a date (“Dec[ember] 7/[18]76”) that does not correspond to that cited in the protologue. Therefore, the illustration in the protologue is regarded here as the lectotype of the concerned name, and the voucher including an inflorescence and a bulb is selected here as epitype.

Drimia hockii De Wild. View in CoL in Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 12: 294 (1913). Type:— DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO. Ober-Katanga , Elisabethville, September 1911, Ad. Hock s.n. (BR880749! lecto. designated here).

Drimia incerta A.Chev. ex Hutch., Fl. W. Trop. Afr. View in CoL [Hutchinson & Dalziel] 2: 351 (1936) Type:— IVORY COAST. Hte. Sassandra, Pays Toura, Mont Dourou, à 1000 m d’altitude, près Koualé, 27 May 1909, Aug. Chevalier 21733 (P02156156! lecto. designated as “ type ” by Hutchinson in Kew Bull. 1939: 245. 1939).

Drimia ledermannii K.Krause in Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 51(3-4): 444 (1914). Type:— CAMEROON. Nordkamerun , Zwischen Lubare und Bakari, in hügeliger Baumsteppe, um 900−1000 m ü. M., 19 June 1909, C. Ledermann 2264 (B 10 0168393! lecto. designated here).

Drimia media Jacq. ex Willd., Sp. Pl. View in CoL 2: 166 (1799) ≡ Hyacinthus medius (Jacq. ex Willd.) Poir. in Lam., Encycl., Suppl. 3: 120 (1813) ≡ Idothea media (Jacq.) Kunth, Enum. Pl. View in CoL 4: 342 (1843). Type:—illustration in Jacq., Icon. Pl. Rar. 2 (16): t. 375 (1795) ( Fig. 18.3 View FIGURE 18 ) (lecto. designated by Jessop in J. S. African Bot. 43: 282. 1977).

= Drimia rigidifolia Baker View in CoL in J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 11: 420 (1871) [non Urginea rigidifolia Baker View in CoL in J. Bot. 16: 323 (1878)] ≡ Idothea rigidifolia (Baker) Kuntze, Revis. Gen. Pl. View in CoL 2: 712 (1891). Type:— SOUTH AFRICA. Somerset [?], Bowker 225 (K000857419! lecto. designated by Jessop in J. S. African Bot. 43: 285. 1977).

Drimia neriniformis Baker, Fl. Cap. (Harvey) 6: 442 (1897) ( Figs 2.1 View FIGURE 2 , 20.3 View FIGURE 20 ). Type:— SOUTH AFRICA. Free State. Harrismith (2829): Van Reenen , (–AD), marshy ground, 5000−6000 ft., 15 November 1892, Wood 4794 (K000257350! lecto. designated by Jessop in J. S. African Bot. 43: 280. 1977; E00109542!, NH0006430-0!, MO2142490!, P, PRE, SAM0023179-0!, Z, isolecto.).

= Drimia capitata Baker, Fl. Cap. (Harvey) 6(3): 442 (1897) [non Ornithogalum capitatum Hook.f. in Bot. Mag. 89: t. 5388 (1863) ≡ Urginea capitata (Hook.f.) Baker, Fl. Cap. (Harvey) 6(3): 465 (1897) ≡ Fusifilum capitatum (Hook.f.) Speta in Phyton (Horn, Austria) 38(1): 69 (1998)]. Type:— SOUTH AFRICA. [Eastern Cape]. Umtata (3128): Bazeia [Baziya], (–CB), Baur 1160 (K000257353! lecto. designated by Jessop in J. S. African Bot. 43: 280. 1977).

Drimia pusilla Jacq. ex Willd., Sp. Pl. View in CoL 2: 165 (1799) ≡ Hyacinthus pusillus (Jacq.) Poir. in Lam., Encycl., Suppl. 3: 120 (1813) ≡ Idothea pusilla (Jacq.) Kunth, Enum. Pl. View in CoL 4: 344 (1843) [non Anthericum pusillum Jacq., Icon. Pl. Rar. View in CoL 2(16): 18, t. 417 (1795) ≡ Fusifilum pusillum (Jacq.) Speta in Phyton (Horn, Austria) 38: 70 (1998)]. Type:— SOUTH AFRICA. Illustration in Jacq., Icon. Pl. Rar. 2(14): t. 374 (1794) ( Fig. 18.4 View FIGURE 18 ) (lecto. designated by Jessop in J. S. African Bot. 43: 284. 1977).

Drimia robusta Baker in Refug. Bot. 3: t. 190 (1870) ≡ Idothea robusta (Baker) Kuntze, Revis. Gen. Pl. View in CoL 2: 712 (1891) ( Figs 2.2 View FIGURE 2 , 19.3 View FIGURE 19 , 20.4 View FIGURE 20 ). Type:— SOUTH AFRICA. Cape Colony, from Cooper, Hort Saunders 4404, 1869, Cooper s.n. (K000857417! holo.).

Drimia rudatisii Schltr. in Engl. Bot. Jahrb. 40: 89 (1907). Type:— SOUTH AFRICA. KwaZulu-Natal. Port Shepstone (3030): Dumisa, feuchten schattigen Orten bei Fairfield , (–AD), 24 August 1905, Rudatis 79 (B100167475! holo.).

Drimia sphaerocephala Baker, Fl. Cap. (Harvey) View in CoL 6: 441 (1897) ( Fig. 20.5 View FIGURE 20 ). Type:— SOUTH AFRICA. Mpumalanga. Komatipoort (2531): Concession Creek near Barberton , (–CC), 7 September 1890, Galpin 1020 (K000400570! lecto. designated by Jessop in J. S. African Bot. 43: 280. 1977; BOL140327!, SAM0023178! isolecto.).

Drimia villosa Lindl. in Edwards’s Bot. Reg. 16: t. 1346 (1830) ≡ Strepsiphyla villosa (Lindl.) Raf., Fl. Tellur. 3: 60 (1837) ≡ Idothea villosa (Lindl.) Kunth, Enum. Pl. View in CoL 4: 343 (1843). Type:— SOUTH AFRICA. Cape of Good Hope, received by Mr Tate, illustration in Edwards’s Bot. Reg. 16: t. 1346 (1830) ( Fig. 19.4 View FIGURE 19 ) (lecto. designated here).

Drimia zombensis Baker, Fl. Trop. Afr. [Oliver et al.] 7(3): 525 (1898). Type:— MALAWI. Nyasaland, Mount Zomba, elev. 3000–5000 ft, September 1859, Kirk s.n. (K000400584! holo.).

Kingdom

Plantae

Phylum

Tracheophyta

Class

Liliopsida

Order

Asparagales

Family

Asparagaceae

Loc

Drimia Jacq. ex Willd., Sp. Pl.

Martínez-Azorín, Mario, Crespo, Manuel B., Alonso-Vargas, María Ángeles, Pinter, Michael, Crouch, Neil R., Dold, Anthony P., Mucina, Ladislav, Pfosser, Martin & Wetschnig, Wolfgang 2023
2023
Loc

Drimia sphaerocephala Baker, Fl. Cap. (Harvey)

Jessop 1977: 280
1977
Loc

Drimia incerta A.Chev. ex

Hutchinson 1939: 245
1939
Loc

Drimia rigidifolia

Jessop 1977: 285
Baker 1891: 712
Baker 1878: 323
Baker 1871: 420
1871
Loc

Drimia elata Jacq. ex

Stedje & Thulin 1995: 597
Willd. 1843: 343
Lam, Encycl. 1813: 120
Willd., Sp. Pl. 1799: 165
1799
Loc

Drimia media Jacq. ex

Jessop 1977: 282
Jacq. 1843: 342
Lam., Encycl. 1813: 120
Willd., Sp. Pl. 1799: 166
1799
Loc

Drimia pusilla Jacq. ex

Jessop 1977: 284
Jacq. 1843: 344
Lam., Encycl. 1813: 120
Willd., Sp. Pl. 1799: 165
1795: 18
1799
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF