Squilla Steinh., 1836
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.610.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8330749 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3C345D7B-FFBB-FFBA-FCA6-F9CCB61CFD3A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Squilla Steinh. |
status |
|
21. Squilla Steinh. View in CoL View at ENA
in Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. sér. 2, 6: 276 (1836),
Typus generis:— S. maritima View in CoL (L.) Steinh. (lectotype, vide Pfeiffer, Nom. 2(2): 1252. 1874).
≡ Charybdis Speta View in CoL in Phyton (Horn, Austria) 38(1): 58 (1998), nom. nov. et nom. illeg. superfl. [Art. 52 of the ICN] ( Figs 52–54 View FIGURE 52 View FIGURE 53 View FIGURE 54 ). Typus generis:— C. maritima View in CoL (L.) Speta (holotype).
Description:—Usually tall bulbous geophyte. Bulb usually large and hypogeal, rarely somewhat epigeal, ovoid to globose, up to 20 cm in diam. Roots thickened and branched. Leaves (4–)6‒10 per bulb, narrowly lanceolate to widely ovate, hysteranthous, up to 35 cm long, margin entire or sometimes undulate with ciliae or minute papillae, green or somewhat glaucous, smooth, glabrous. Inflorescence a long, erect, multiflowered raceme, with up to 1000 flowers, 6‒70 cm long; peduncle 15‒120 cm long, dull green with grey to purple tinge, terete, erect, smooth and glabrous; pedicels 5‒35 mm long, subpatent and usually arching upwards, sometimes erect or patent at anthesis. Bracts narrowly lanceolate, usually dry and wrinkled at flowering time, lowermost with short spur; bracteoles present and distinct. Flowers stellate or with reflexed lobes, erect-patent, diurnal, lasting more than one day. Tepals 6, biseriate, 7‒16 mm long, free or connate for less than 1‒2 mm, lanceolate-ovate to spathulate, usually white or rarely purple, with purplish or green longitudinal band. Stamens 6, spreading; filaments smooth, usually white and lanceolate to narrowly triangular, flattened or rarely filiform and purplish; anthers dorsifixed. Ovary ovate-oblong, usually with three apical protuberances, green to yellow, with ca. 5‒10 ovules per locule. Style 3‒12 mm long, erect, white or rarely tinged with purple, with trigonous stigma. Capsule ovate, 7‒19 mm long, green first and yellowish and papyraceous after ripening, valves completely dehiscing from base, tepals cohering and inrolled above ovary after anthesis, circumcissile from base and persisting as a cap at the top of the developing capsules. Seeds ovate-oblong to linear-oblong, 4‒12 mm long, flattened, testa black, with sinuous anticlinal cell walls.
Number of species and distribution:— Squilla includes twelve species, occurring mostly along the Mediterranean Basin, spanning the Canary Islands and the Middle East ( Speta 1998a, Martínez-Azorín et al. 2022) ( Fig. 49 View FIGURE 49 ); it is nearly restricted to the Mediterranean and Macaronesian Regions (sensu Takhtajan 1986). For further information on Squilla see Pfosser & Speta (2001, 2004), Crespo et al. (2020), and Martínez-Azorín et al. (2022).
Karyology:—2n=20 ( Martinoli 1954, Battaglia 1957, Bartolo et al. 1984, as Urginea undulata (Desf.) Steinh. ; Valdés-Bermejo 1980, Battaglia 1957, as D. maura Maire ); 2n=28 ( Bramwell et al. 1972, as Urginea hesperia Webb. & Berth. ); 2n=40 ( Satô 1942, as Urginea scilla Steinh. ); 2n=20, 30, 40, 50, 60 ( Battaglia 1957, 1964, Valdés-Bermejo 1980, Speta 1980, Pfosser & Speta 2001, Rico 2013, Bacchetta et al. 2012); 2n=20, 40, 60, 60+1B, 60+2B ( Boscaiu et al. 2001, Fernández et al. 2001, Talavera et al. 1995, Oberprieler & Vogt 1994, as Urginea maritima ).
History, diagnostic characters, and taxonomic relationships:— Martínez-Azorín & Crespo (2016a) showed that the Linnaean Scilla was first typified on Scilla maritima Linnaeus (1753: 308) by Rafinesque (1837: 8) and not on Scilla bifolia Linnaeus (1753: 309) as usually accepted [vide Index Nominum Genericorum: Farr & Zijlstra (2023) http://botany.si.edu/ing/].
Steinheil (1836) described Squilla to segregate Scilla maritima Linnaeus (1753: 308) ( Urginea scilla Steinheil 1834: 321 ) from his previously described Urginea , implying Squilla to be different from the name Scilla . Speta (1998b) accepted separation of both Urginea Steinh. and Squilla , but proposed the new name Charybdis , with C. maritima ( Linnaeus 1753: 38) Speta (1998b: 60) as type, to replace Squilla since he considered the latter to be an orthographic variant of both Scilla and Skilla Rafinesque (1837: 13) , and therefore a later illegitimate homonym. However, based on the typification by Rafinesque (1837) of Scilla maritima , Charybdis is illegitimate under Art. 52 of the Shenzhen Code as it was superfluous when published, a fact that makes Charybdis unavailable for use.
Martínez-Azorín & Crespo (2016b) requested the Nomenclature Committee for Vascular Plants (NCVP) for a binding decision on whether Scilla L. (subfam. Hyacinthoideae ) and Squilla Steinh. (subfam. Urgineoideae ≡ Asparagaceae subfam. Scilloideae trib. Urgineeae ) are sufficiently alike to be considered orthographic variants and to be confused. After several attempts, a sufficient number of the Committee Members voted recently in favour of a binding decision that both names are not confusable (cf. Appelquist 2022), which deed allows Squilla to be used in the sense of the current concept of Charybdis ( Martínez-Azorín et al. 2022) .
Previous phylogenetic analyses ( Pfosser & Speta 2001, 2004, Manning et al. 2004, Pfosser et al. 2012) show samples of Squilla (as Charybdis ) forming a strongly supported clade. Many authors recently accepted Charybdis as distinct from Urginea and Drimia at generic rank (cf. Speta 1998b, Pfosser & Speta 2001, 2004, Conti et al. 2005, Jeanmonod & Gamisans 2007, Bacchetta et al. 2012, Ali et al. 2013, Véla et al. 2016), although others (e.g. Manning et al. 2004, Manning & Goldblatt 2018, WCSP 2021) place them in an expanded and broadly circumscribed Drimia . The phylogenetic analyses of Martínez-Azorín et al. (2023a) included 22 samples of Squilla , which formed a strongly supported clade in an isolated position within Urgineoideae . Therefore, based on the distinct morphology and genetic divergence of these plants, we here accept Squilla following Martínez-Azorín et al. (2022), which is mostly restricted to the Mediterranean Basin.
Accepted species:—
Squilla anthericoides (Poir.) Jord. & Fourr., Icon. Fl. Eur. View in CoL 2: 2 (1868) ≡ Scilla anthericoides Poir., Voy. Barbarie View in CoL 2: 149 (1789), basionym ≡ Ornithogalum anthericoides (Poir.) Link ex Steud., Nomencl. Bot. View in CoL 1: 573 (1821) ≡ Urginea anthericoides (Poir.) Steinh. View in CoL in Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. sér. 2, 1: 328 (1834) ≡ Charybdis anthericoides (Poir.) Véla & Bélair View in CoL in Phytotaxa 288: 155 (2016) ≡ Drimia anthericoides (Poir.) Véla & Bélair View in CoL in Willdenowia 49: 423 (2019) ≡ Urginea maritima var. anthericoides (Poir.) Maire & Weiller, Fl. Afrique N. View in CoL 5: 163 (1958). Type:—[ ALGERIA.] Ex Numidia, herb. Poiret (P02157340! lecto. designated by Véla et al. in Phytotaxa 288: 155. 2016: the specimen on the upper right side of the sheet).
Squilla aphylla (Forssk.) Mart. -Azorín, M.B.Crespo & M.Á.Alonso in Medit. Bot. 43-e78272: 3 (2022) ≡ Anthericum aphyllum Forssk., Fl. Aegypt.-Arab.: 209 (1775), basionym ≡ Urginea aphylla (Forssk.) Speta View in CoL in Linzer Biol. Beitr. 12(1): 229 (1980) ≡ Charybdis aphylla (Forssk.) Speta in Phyton (Horn, Austria) 38(1): 60 (1998) ≡ Drimia aphylla (Forssk.) J.C.Manning & Goldblatt View in CoL in Edinburgh J. Bot. 60(3): 556 (2004). Type:—[ GREECE]. “ Anthericum ” F. Herb. Forskålii n° 10 [IDC microfiche foto: Forsskål nr. 129 III, 1–2] (C10001668! lecto. designated by Martínez-Azorín et al. 2022).
= Ornithogalum elatum Andrews in Bot. Repos. 8, pl. DXXVIII (1808) ≡ Charybdis elata (Andrews) Speta in Phyton (Horn, Austria) 38(1): 60 (1998) ≡ Drimia excelsa J.C.Manning & Goldblatt View in CoL in Edinburgh J. Bot. 60(3): 556 (2004), replac. name [non Drimia elata Jacq., Collectanea 5(Suppl.): 38. 1797]. Type:—illustration in Andrews (1808), pl. DXXVIII (lecto. designated by Martínez-Azorín et al. 2022: only the flowering scape and the flower dissection).
Squilla glaucophylla (Bacch., Brullo, D’Emerico, Pontec. & Salmeri) Mart. -Azorín, M.B.Crespo & M.Á.Alonso in Medit. Bot. 43- e78272: 4 (2022) ≡ Charybdis glaucophylla Bacch., Brullo, D’Emerico, Pontec. & Salmeri View in CoL in Phytotaxa 69: 18 (2012), basionym ≡ Drimia glaucophylla (Bacch., Brullo, D’Emerico, Pontec. & Salmeri) Raus View in CoL in Willdenowia 46(3): 424 (2016). Type:— ITALY. Sardinia: Isola di San Pietro: Cala Vinagra, Carloforte, elev. 63 m, 19 July 2004, G. Bacchetta & C. Pontecorvo s.n. (CAT, holo.; CAG, CAT, iso.).
Squilla hesperia (Webb & Berthel.) Mart. -Azorín, M.B.Crespo & M.Á.Alonso in Medit. Bot. 43-e78272: 4 (2022) ≡ Urginea hesperia Webb & Berthel., Hist. Nat. Iles Canaries (Phytogr., sect. 3) 3(2): 339 (1848), basionym ≡ Charybdis hesperia (Webb & Berthel.) Speta in Phyton (Horn, Austria) 38(1): 60 (1998) ≡ Drimia hesperia (Webb & Berthel.) J.C.Manning & Goldblatt View in CoL in Edinburgh J. Bot. 60(3): 556 (2004) ≡ U. maritima var. hesperia (Webb & Berthel.) Svent. in Index Sem. Acclim. Pl. Arautapae 1969: 41 (1970) ≡ Drimia maritima var. hesperia (Webb & Berthel.) A.Hansen & Sunding, Fl. Macaronesia , Checklist Vasc. Pl., rev. ed. 2, 2: 4 (1979) ( Figs 4.10 View FIGURE 4 , 53.1 View FIGURE 53 ). Type:— SPAIN. Canary Islands. Urginea hesperia Nobis “3”, Herbarium Webbianum nº 182548 (FI000284!, lecto. designated by Martínez-Azorín et al. 2022).
Squilla maritima View in CoL (L.) Steinh.in Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. sér. 2, 6: 279 (1836) ≡ Scilla maritima L., Sp. Pl.: 308 (1753), basionym ≡ Ornithogalum maritimum (L.) Lam., Fl. Franç. 3: 276 (1779) ≡ Urginea maritima (L.) Baker in J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 13: 221 (1872) ≡ Drimia maritima (L.) Stearn in Ann. Mus. Goulandris 4: 204 (1978) ≡ Charybdis maritima (L.) Speta in Phyton (Horn, Austria) 38(1): 60 (1998) ≡ Stellaris scilla Moench, Methodus View in CoL : 304 (1794), nom. illeg. [Art. 52 of the ICN] ≡ Ornithogalum squilla Ker Gawl. in Bot. Mag. 23, t. 918 (1806), nom. illeg. [Art. 52 of the ICN] ≡ U. scilla Steinh. View in CoL in Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. sér. 2, 1: 331 (1834), nom. illeg. [Art. 52 of the ICN] ( Figs 4.11 View FIGURE 4 , 52.1, 52.2, 52.3 View FIGURE 52 , 53.2 View FIGURE 53 ). Type:—illustration in Clusius (1601: 171, Fig. 52.1 View FIGURE 52 ), “Scillae hispanicae flos & semen” (lecto. designated by Martínez-Azorín et al. 2022 b: only the illustration of the bulb with a flowering scape). Epitype (designated by Martínez-Azorín et al. 2022):— PORTUGAL. Sierra de Monsanto, environs de Lisbonne, pentes pierreuses, July−August 1877, J. Daveau (P02166423! epi.; P02166260!, P02166417!, P01811235!, P01811236!, isoepi.).
Comments on typification:—Recently, Martínez-Azorín et al. (2022) considered that the lectotype of Scilla maritima , first designated by Ferrer-Gallego (2013: 40) on the voucher L0052807, should be disregarded according to Art. 8.2 of the ICN, because completely developed adult leaves in this species are never coetaneous with flowers at anthesis in a given population. This implies that the “ lectotype ” selected by Ferrer-Gallego (2013) includes two specimens collected at different times: i) leaves, and ii) the flowering scape. Considering Ferrer-Gallegos’s (2022) reaction to our lectotypification, and in the light of the recentmost proposal by Mosyakin & McNeill (2022) to amend Art. 8, after which the information in the protologue will rule, we still consider that the voucher L0052807 cannot be a proper lectotype, following Linnaeus’s statement in Hortus Cliffortianus (1738: 123) that is cited in the Scilla maritima protologue of 1753: “ Scilla radice tunicata [….] Singulare est quod foliis destitute floreat.” Further, Clusius (1601: 171), which is also cited in the protologue of S. maritima , illustrated the species through both a bulb with fully-developed leaves (winterspring facies) and two bulbs with flowering and fruiting scapes; those latter figures are completely lacking leaves (later summerearly autumn facies); in addition, Clusius (1601) describes the typical hysteranthous behaviour of the species in Hispania as follows: “Copiose nascitur supra Olysipponem & plerisque aliis Lusitaniae & Hispaniae locis. Floret Augusto & Septembri, semen Octobri & Novembri maturescit; folia maturo jam semine, & exarido caule, emergunt Novembri & Decembri.” Based on those facts, we do believe that Linnaeus never saw plants of Scilla maritima showing flowers and leaves coetaneously, as he indirectly claimed in his Hortus Cliffortianus ( Linnaeus 1738), and hence the Linnaean voucher L0052807 most likely represents a “collage” of mixed gatherings of flowers and leaves collected at different times, and it as a whole cannot be eligible as lectotype. Therefore, the lectotype and epitype we designated ( Martínez-Azorín et al. 2022) are considered here as appropriate to preserve the currently most widely accepted concept of this species.
= Scilla rubra Garsault, Descr. Pl. Anim. View in CoL 4: 314, pl. 527 (1767). Type:—illustration in Garsault (l.c.), pl. 527 “ Scilla rubra ” (lecto. designated by Martínez-Azorín et al. 2022: only the illustrations of the bulb with a flowering scape, and the flowers).
Squilla maura (Maire) Mart. -Azorín, M.B.Crespo & M.Á.Alonso in Medit. Bot. 43-e78272: 7 (2022) ≡ Urginea maura Maire View in CoL in Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afrique N. 14: 158 (1923), basionym ≡ Charybdis maura (Maire) Speta in Phyton (Horn, Austria) 38(1): 60 (1998) ≡ Drimia maura (Maire) J.C.Manning & Goldblatt View in CoL in Edinburgh J. Bot. 60(3): 557 (2004) ≡ Urginea maritima var. maura (Maire) Maire, Fl. Afrique N. View in CoL 5: 165 (1958) ≡ Drimia maritima subsp. maura (Maire) F̂rther & Podlech in Sendtnera 7: 86 (2001). Type:— MOROCCO. Grand Atlas: Mentaga, rocailles calcaires, elev. 200–1000 m, feuilles glauques, 14 April 1922, R. Maire (MPU000488! lecto. designated by Martínez-Azorín et al. 2022).
= Urginea maritima subsp. maura var. angustifolia Maire View in CoL in Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afrique N. 29: 454 (1938) ≡ Urginea maritima var. maura f. angustifolia (Maire) Maire, Fl. Afrique N. View in CoL 5: 165 (1958), basionym. Type:— MOROCCO. Anti Atlas : près de Kerdous, pentes rocheuses (quartzites), elev. 800 m, 38 March 1937, R. Maire (MPU003971! lecto. designated by Martínez-Azorín et al. 2022).
Squilla numidica Jord. & Fourr., Icon. Fl. Eur. View in CoL 2: 1 (1868) ≡ Urginea numidica (Jord. & Fourr.) Grey, Hardy Bulbs View in CoL 2: 632 (1938) ≡ Urginea maritima var. numidica (Jord. & Fourr.) Baker View in CoL in J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 13: 221 (1873) ≡ Charybdis numidica (Jord. & Fourr.) Speta in Phyton (Horn, Austria) 38(1): 60 (1998) ≡ Drimia numidica (Jord. & Fourr.) J.C.Manning & Goldblatt View in CoL in Edinburgh J. Bot. 60(3): 557 (2004). Type:—[ ALGERIA.] “ Squilla maritima numidica / de Bône (Algerie)”, 6 Novembre 1867 (LY0073734 [digital image!] lecto. designated by Martínez-Azorín et al. 2022).
= Squilla sphaeroidea Jord. & Fourr., Icon. Fl. Eur. View in CoL 2: 1 (1868) ≡ Urginea maritima var. sphaeroidea (Jord. & Fourr.) Baker View in CoL in J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 13: 221 (1873) ≡ U. sphaeroidea (Jord. & Fourr.) Grey, Hardy Bulbs View in CoL 2: 632 (1938). Type:—illustration in Jordan & Fourreau (1868): Tab. CCII “278. Squilla sphaeroidea ” [lecto. designated by Martínez-Azorín et al. 2022: only the illustrations of the flowering scape, flowers and bracts ( Figs 1−12 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 11 View FIGURE 12 ); excluding bulb, leaves, fruits and seeds ( Figs 13−16 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 View FIGURE 15 View FIGURE 16 )].
Squilla palaestina (M.B.Crespo, Mart.-Azorín & M.Á.Alonso) Mart.- Azorín, M.B.Crespo & M.Á. Alonso in Medit. Bot. 43-e78272: 8 (2022) ≡ Drimia palaestina M.B.Crespo, Mart. - Azorín & M.Á. Alonso in Pl. Syst. Evol. 306: 13 (2020), basionym ( Figs 4.12 View FIGURE 4 , 53.3 View FIGURE 53 ). Type:— PALESTINE. [Palestinian Authority], Judean Mts. South of Yata, Submediterranean batha, 23 September 1970, Y. Plitmann & M. Raviv 26089 (HUJ132724! holo.) .
Squilla pancration Steinh. View in CoL in Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. sér. 2, 6: 279 (1836) ≡ Scilla pancration (Steinh.) Nyman, Syll. Fl. Eur. View in CoL : 369 (1855) ≡ Urginea pancration (Steinh.) Schroff in Z. Allg. Oesterr. Apotheker-Vereines 3 (Oesterr. Z. Pharmazie 13): 42 (1865) ≡ Charybdis pancration (Steinh.) Speta in Phyton (Horn, Austria) 38(1): 60 (1998) ≡ Drimia pancration (Steinh.) J.C.Manning & Goldblatt View in CoL in Edinburgh J. Bot. 60(3): 557 (2004) ≡ Urginea maritima var. pancration (Steinh.) Baker View in CoL in J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 13: 221 (1873) ≡ U. maritima subsp. pancration (Steinh.) K. Richter, Pl. Eur. View in CoL 1: 218 (1890) ( Figs 4.13 View FIGURE 4 , 54.1 View FIGURE 54 ). Type:— MALTA. Gozo island (Għawdex), pr. Ir-Ramla, between San Blas and S. Philip, 33SVV359908, elev. 70 m, flowered in cultivation at the University of Alicante on 04 September 2013, J.L. Villar & E. Martínez s.n. (ABH70437! neo. designated by Martínez-Azorín et al. 2022).
= Squilla insularis Jord. & Fourr., Icon. Fl. Eur. View in CoL 2: 2 (1868) ≡ Urginea maritima var. insularis (Jord. & Fourr.) Baker View in CoL in J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 13: 221 (1873) ≡ U. maritima subsp. insularis (Jord. & Fourr.) K. Richt., Pl. Eur. View in CoL 1: 218 (1890) ≡ U. scilla var. insularis (Jord. & Fourr.) Rouy, Fl. France 12: 425 (1910) ≡ U. insularis (Jord. & Fourr.) Grey, Hardy Bulbs View in CoL 2: 632 (1938). Type:—illustration in Jordan & Fourreau (1868): Tab. CCIII “279. Squilla insularis ” [lecto. designated by Martínez-Azorín et al. 2022: only the illustrations of the flowering scape, flowers and bracts ( Figs 1−12 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 11 View FIGURE 12 ); excluding bulb, leaves, fruits and seeds ( Figs 13−16 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 View FIGURE 15 View FIGURE 16 )].
= Squilla littoralis Jord. & Fourr., Icon. Fl. Eur. View in CoL 2: 2 (1868) ≡ Urginea maritima var. littoralis (Jord. & Fourr.) Baker View in CoL in J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 13: 221–222 (1873) ≡ U. maritima subsp. littoralis (Jord. & Fourr.) K.Richt., Pl. Eur. View in CoL 1: 218 (1890) ≡ U. littoralis (Jord. & Fourr.) Grey, Hardy Bulbs View in CoL 2: 632 (1938). Type:—illustration in Jordan & Fourreau (1868): Tab. CCIV “280. Squilla littoralis ” [lecto. designated by Martínez-Azorín et al. 2022: only the illustrations of the flowering scape, flowers and bracts ( Figs 1−12 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 11 View FIGURE 12 ); excluding bulb, leaves, fruits and seeds ( Figs 13−16 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 View FIGURE 15 View FIGURE 16 )].
Squilla secundiflora (Maire) Mart. -Azorín, M.B.Crespo & M.Á.Alonso in Medit. Bot. 43-e78272: 9 (2022) ≡ Urginea anthericoides var. secundiflora Maire View in CoL in Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afrique N. 24: 229 (1933), basionym ≡ Drimia secundiflora (Maire) M.B.Crespo, Mart. -Azorín & M.Á.Alonso in Pl. Syst. Evol. 306: 15 (2020) ( Fig. 4.14 View FIGURE 4 ). Type:— MOROCCO. Forêt de la Mamora, bulbes cultivés à Alger ayant fleuri en septembre 1932, 28 October 1932, R. Maire s.n. (MPU003124! lecto designated by Crespo et al. 2020: 15 [as “ U. anthericoides var. secunda Maire ”]; only the flowering scape).
Squilla serotina (Schousb.) Mart. -Azorín, M.B.Crespo & M.Á.Alonso in Medit. Bot. 43-e78272: 9 (2022) ≡ Scilla serotina Schousb., Iagttag. Vextrig. View in CoL Marokko: 165 (1800), basionym ≡ Urginea anthericoides var. serotina (Schousb.) Font Quer View in CoL in Bol. Real Soc. Esp. Hist. Nat. 27: 45 (1927) ( Figs 4.15 View FIGURE 4 , 54.2 View FIGURE 54 ). Type:—[ MOROCCO.] Herb. Liebm[ann]. Marocco, Schousboe (C10000939! lecto. designated by Crespo et al. 2020: 11, [IDC microfiche foto: Type Herbarium nr. 183 I,4]; C10000940 [digital image!] isolecto. [IDC microfiche foto: Type Herbarium nr. 183 I,5]).
= Urginea undulata var. tazensis Batt. & Maire View in CoL in Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afrique N. 22: 318 (1931) ≡ Urginea tazensis (Batt. & Maire) Maire View in CoL in Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afrique N. 31: 43 (1940) ≡ Urginea undulata subsp. tazensis (Batt. & Maire) Maire & Weiller, Fl. Afrique N. View in CoL 5: 158 (1958) ≡ Drimia tazensis (Maire) Stearn View in CoL in Ann. Mus. Goulandris 4: 208 (1978) ≡ Charybdis tazensis (Batt. & Maire) Speta View in CoL in Stapfia 75: 167 (2001). Type:— MOROCCO. Tiznit, bulbs cultivated in Alger (Algeria), 18 September 1939, R. Maire (MPU004613! neo. designated by Crespo et al. 2020: 11).
= Urginea undulata var. major Gatt. & Weiller View in CoL in Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat.Afrique N. 28: 539 (1937). Type:— MOROCCO. Tiznit , sandy soils, cultivated in Alger (Algeria), 8 September 1936, R. Maire (MPU001417! neo. designated by Crespo et al. 2020: 11).
Squilla undulata (Desf.) Mart. View in CoL -Azorín, M.B.Crespo & M.Á.Alonso in Medit. Bot. 43-e78272: 10 (2022) ≡ Scilla undulata Desf. View in CoL in Méd. Eclairée Sci. Phys. 3(6): 161 (1792), basionym ≡ Urginea undulata (Desf.) Steinh. View in CoL in Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. sér. 2, 1: 330 (1834) ≡
Epimenidion undulatum (Desf.) Raf., Fl. Tellur. 2: 13 (1837) ≡ Prospero undulatum (Desf.) Salisb., Gen. Pl. View in CoL : 28 (1866) ≡ Drimia undata Stearn View in CoL in Ann. Mus. Goulandris 4: 208 (1978), replac. name [non Drimia undulata Jacq. in Willd., Sp. Pl. ed. 4, 2(1): 166. (1799), nec Jacq., Collectanea 5 (Suppl.): 41. 1797, nom. inval.] ≡ Charybdis undulata (Desf.) Speta View in CoL in Stapfia 75: 167 (2001), nom. illeg. [Art. 52 of the ICN] ( Figs 4.16 View FIGURE 4 , 52.5 View FIGURE 52 , 54.3 View FIGURE 54 ). Type:— ALGERIA. Herbier de la Flore Atlantique, no. 707 Scilla undulata [Tunis et Alger, collines arides, elle fleurit en hiver, 1787], Desfontaines (P00320347! lecto. designated by Crespo et al. 2019: 91: the flowering scape with bulb on the left side of the sheet; MPU017529! isolecto.).
= Urginea undulata f. caeculi Pau in Butl. Inst. Catalana His. Nat. 16: 136 (1916), basionym ≡ Urginea undulata var. caeculi (Pau) Pau View in CoL in Bol. Soc. Ibér. Ci. Nat. 23: 91 (1924) ≡ Drimia undata subsp. caeculi (Pau) Mateo & M.B.Crespo, Fl. Abrev. Comun. Valenciana View in CoL : 430 (1995) ≡ Urginea undulata subsp. caeculi (Pau) M.B.Crespo & Mateo View in CoL in Flora Montiber. 5: 58 (1997). Type:— SPAIN. Valencia prov., Alginet, cultivada, August 1916, F. Moroder (MA21517! lecto. designated by Crespo & Mateo 1997: the scape on the right side of the sheet, from a bulb with incipient leaves).
= Drimia purpurascens J.Jacq., Ecl. Pl. Rar. 1(3–4): 48, t. 30 (1812) ≡ Idothea purpurascens (J.Jacq.) Kunth, Enum. Pl. View in CoL 4: 342 (1843) ≡ Idothearia purpurascens (J.Jacq.) C.Presl in Abh. K̂nigl. B̂hm. Ges. Wiss. ser. 5, 3: 544 (1845), nom. illeg. superfl. [Art. 52 of the ICN]. Type:—illustration in J.Jacq., Ecl. Pl. Rar. 1(3–4), t. 30. 1812 ( Fig. 52.4 View FIGURE 52 ) (lecto. designated by Crespo et al. 2020: only the flowering scape with bulb). Epitype (designated by Crespo et al. 2020: 9):— ITALY. Sardaigne, 1838, E. Thomas (P02166250! epi.: the fragment on the left side of the sheet).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Squilla Steinh.
Martínez-Azorín, Mario, Crespo, Manuel B., Alonso-Vargas, María Ángeles, Pinter, Michael, Crouch, Neil R., Dold, Anthony P., Mucina, Ladislav, Pfosser, Martin & Wetschnig, Wolfgang 2023 |
Squilla anthericoides (Poir.) Jord. & Fourr., Icon. Fl. Eur.
Vela & Belair 2019: 423 |
Vela & Belair 2016: 155 |
Vela et al. 2016: 155 |
Poir. 1958: 163 |
Poir. 1868: 2 |
Steinh. 1834: 328 |
Steud. 1821: 573 |
Poir., Voy. Barbarie 1789: 149 |
Squilla maritima
Stearn 1978: 204 |
Baker 1872: 221 |
Steinh. 1836: 279 |
Steinh. 1834: 331 |
Moench 1794: 304 |
Linnaeus 1753: 308 |
Clusius, C. 1601: 171 |
Squilla undulata (Desf.)
Steinh. 1834: 330 |
Desf. 1792: 161 |