Chimarra lakhwinderae, Pandher, Manpreet Singh & Saini, Malkiat Singh, 2012
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.212378 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6174228 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3C302125-5265-FFD7-AA92-FAF4D5B7FE52 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Chimarra lakhwinderae |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Chimarra lakhwinderae sp. nov.
( Figs. 10–13 View FIGURES 10 – 19 , 29–31 View FIGURES 23 – 35 , 46–47 View FIGURES 42 – 51 )
Diagnosis: The male genitalia of this species closely resemble those of Chimarra burmana Kimmins 1957 from Myanmar but can be distinguished in lateral view by inferior appendages that are broad and curved inward, each with a distinct mesal process at its middle, whereas these appendages are pointed and without any mesal process in C. burmana . Also in lateral view, the apices of the lateral lobes of tergum X are rounded in C. lakhwinderae , but are triangularly pointed in C. burmana .
Description (male only): Length of each forewing 6.25 mm (n=2). Color in alcohol nearly uniformly fuscous except head blackish and femora yellowish grey; body covered with inconspicuous and fuscous pubescence. Each antenna 4.22 mm long (n=2). Maxillary palps 1.62 mm long (n=2), segment 3 sub-equal to 2 and 5; labial palps 0.65 mm long (n=2). Forewing venation: Rs deflected or curved; discoidal cell elongate, length 3 or more times width; crossvein m usually proximal to crossveins s and r-m; 2A obsolete apically and looped to 1A ( Figs. 46, 47 View FIGURES 42 – 51 ).
Male genitalia ( Figs. 10–13 View FIGURES 10 – 19 , 29–31 View FIGURES 23 – 35 ): Abdominal segment IX long; in lateral view with anteroventral margin broadly pointed; posteroventral process scarcely evident; posterolatersal margins each with 2 protuberances, one each above and below articulation with inferior appendage. Inferior appendages in lateral view narrower basally and broader subapically, stout, each with distinct, backward-directed and incurved dorsomesal projection. Tergum X with sclerotized and projecting and paired lateral and mesal lobes; lateral lobes broad, rounded apically in lateral view; mesal lobes longer than lateral lobes, digitate in lateral view, outwardly curved apically. Preanal appendages rounded, wart-like laterally. Phallic apparatus with sclerotized portion long, cylindrical and pointed apically in ventral and dorsal views ( Figs. 30–31 View FIGURES 23 – 35 ); phallobase cylindrical, posterior part of phallotheca with weak ventrolateral constriction in ventral view ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 23 – 35 ); phallotremal sclerite complex with 2 small slender Y-shaped processes facing each other in ventral view inside retracted phallotheca; endotheca without micro spines in retracted phallotheca, 4 broad, ovoid, asymmetrical spines beyond phallotremal sclerite complex in retracted phallotheca.
Female: Not known.
Material examined: Holotype 3, INDIA: Uttarakhand: Dharchula, 29°51’N, 80°32’E, 1,500 m, 16-vi-2008, Pandher, deposited in PUPM. Paratype: Same data as holotype, 13, deposited in PUPM.
Distribution: India (Uttarakhand).
Etymology: This species is named to acknowledge the assistance of our colleague Lakhwinder Kaur in the preparation of this manuscript.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.