Hygrophila ringens
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.24823/EJB.2022.1911 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3725A61D-FFEA-FF95-3516-6233395BFD00 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Hygrophila ringens |
status |
|
Hygrophila ringens View in CoL (L.) R.Br. ex Steud., Nomencl. Bot. 1: 418 (1821). – Ruellia ringens L.,
Sp. Pl. 2: 635 (1753). – Type: Anon. s.n. (lectotype LINN [ LINN-HL 804.13 ], designated by Hansen in Nicolson et al. (ed.), Interpret. Van Rheede’s Hort. Malab. 40 [1988]) .
Hygrophila phlomoides var. roxburghii C.B.Clarke, Fl. Brit. View in CoL India 4(11): 408 (1884). – Type : Botanical Garden [Calcutta], 9 i 1815, F. Buchanan-Hamilton s.n. [ EIC 2375 ] (lectotype K-W [ K001115795 ], designated here).
Clarke cited the Wallich Catalogue number 2375 in the protologue of his var. roxburghii View in CoL . The specimen in K-W is here designated as lectotype for this name.
Hypobathrum racemosum (Roxb.) Kurz, Prelim. Rep. Forest Pegu, App. B: 59 (1875). – Randia racemosa Roxb., Fl. Ind. View in CoL 2: 144–145 (1824). – Petunga roxburghii DC., Prodr. 4: 399 (1830), nom. illegit., superfl. – Type: [unpublished illustration] Icones Roxburghianae 1207 (lectotype K, designated here). Figure 9 View Figure 9 .
Petunga roxburghii DC. represents a superfluous renaming of Randia racemosa Roxb. De Candolle objected to Roxburgh’s epithet because the inflorescences are spicate rather than racemose. Roxburgh’s drawing, labelled Ixora polysperma , is here selected as lectotype for Roxburgh’s name.
Indigofera coerulea Roxb., Trans. Soc. London Encour. Arts View in CoL 28: 294–296 (1811). – Indigofera roxburghiana J.St. -Hil., Mém. Indigof. Bengale 9 (1826), nom. illegit., superfl. – Indigofera argentea var. coerulea (Roxb.) Baker View in CoL in Hooker, Fl. Brit. India 2(4): 99 (1876). – Type: W. Roxburgh s.n. (lectotype BR [BR0000005170104], designated by Turner, Willdenowia 44: 24 [2014]).
Jaume Saint-Hilaire proposed Indigofera roxburghiana as a replacement name for Indigofera coerulea Roxb. View in CoL , as he believed Roxburgh’s name was a later homonym of I. coerulea View in CoL L.f. However, Linnaeus filius never published this name. Possibly Jaume Saint-Hilaire confused Galega coerulea View in CoL L.f. with Indigofera View in CoL .
Indigofera linifolia (L.f.) Retz., Observ. Bot. 4: 29 (1786). – Hedysarum linifolium L.f., Suppl. Pl. 331 (1782). – Type: Ind. orient., Anon. s.n. (lectotype LINN [ LINN-HL 921.5 ], designated by Ali, Bot. Notiser 111: 543 [1958]) .
Indigofera roxburghii Tausch View in CoL , Flora 14(2): 671 (1831). – Type [published illustration] ‘ Indigofera View in CoL linifolia’, Roxburgh, Pl. Coromandel 2: t. 195 (1805) (lectotype designated here).
Tausch based Indigofera roxburghii View in CoL on Indigofera linifolia sensu Roxb. View in CoL Roxburgh’s plate is here selected as lectotype of Tausch’s name.
LINN |
Linnean Society of London |
L |
Nationaal Herbarium Nederland, Leiden University branch |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Hygrophila ringens
Turner, Ian M. 2022 |
Indigofera roxburghii
Tausch 1831: 671 |
Hygrophila ringens
Steud. 1821: 418 |