Tetractomia tetrandrum (Roxb.) Merr., J. Straits Branch Roy. Asiat. Soc.
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.24823/EJB.2022.1911 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3725A61D-FF85-FFF7-3516-64EB3938FBCE |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Tetractomia tetrandrum (Roxb.) Merr., J. Straits Branch Roy. Asiat. Soc. |
| status |
|
Tetractomia tetrandrum (Roxb.) Merr., J. Straits Branch Roy. Asiat. Soc. 76: 87 (1917).
– Melicope tetrandra Roxb., Fl. Ind. View in CoL 2: 257 (1832). – Tetractomia roxburghii Hook.f. View in CoL ,
Fl. Brit. India 1(3): 491 (1875), nom. illegit., superfl. – Melicope roxburghii Engl., Nat. Pflanzenfam. View in CoL 3(4): 122 (1896), nom. illegit., superfl. – Type: [unpublished illustration] Icones Roxburghianae 1411 (lectotype K, designated by Hartley, J. Arnold Arbor . 60: 132, 137 [1979]).
Tetractomia roxburghii Hook.f. is a superfluous name based on Melicope tetrandra Roxb.
Tetrapogon roxburghianus (Schult.) P.M.Peterson , Taxon 64: 460 (2015). – Chloris polystachya Roxb., Fl. Ind. View in CoL 1: 332 (1820), nom. illegit., non C. polystachya Lag. (1816) View in CoL .
– Chloris roxburghiana Schult., Mant. View in CoL 2: 239 (1824). – Type: [unpublished illustration] Icones Roxburghianae 2023 (lectotype K, designated by Renvoize in Polhill , Fl. Trop. E. Afr. Gram. Pt 2 339 [1974]; India, Tamil Nadu, Shambaganur , L. Auglade 1759 (epitype CAL [ CAL0000035996 About CAL ], designated by Das & Karthigeyan, Phytotaxa 464: 249 [2020]).
Schultes renamed Chloris polystachya Roxb. as Chloris roxburghiana because Roxburgh’s name was a later homonym. Das & Karthigeyan (2020) designated an epitype for Roxburgh’s name. They cited the lectotypification as by Peterson et al. (2015), but it was already effected by Renvoize more than 40 years before that. Fortunately, the same element was chosen as lectotype, so the epitypification stands.
Tetrastigma leucostaphylum (Dennst.) Alston View in CoL , Taxon 26: 539 (1977). – Cissus leucostaphyla Dennst., Schlüssel View in CoL 17, 19, 33 (1818). – Type: [published illustration] ‘Vallia-tsjori-valli’, Rheede, Hort. Malab. 7: t. 8 (1688) (lectotype, designated by Mabberley, Taxon 26: 539 [1977]).
Cissus View in CoL feminea Roxb., Fl. Ind. 1: 428–429 (1820). – Vitis roxburghii Wight & Arn., Prodr. Fl. Ind. Orient. View in CoL 127 (1834), nom. illegit., superfl. – Type: [unpublished illustration] Icones Roxburghianae 543 (lectotype K, designated here) .
Vitis roxburghii Wight & Arn. is a superfluous renaming of Cissus feminea Roxb. Roxburgh’s drawing is here selected a lectotype.
| K |
Royal Botanic Gardens |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Tetractomia tetrandrum (Roxb.) Merr., J. Straits Branch Roy. Asiat. Soc.
| Turner, Ian M. 2022 |
Tetrapogon roxburghianus (Schult.) P.M.Peterson
| P. M. Peterson 2015: 460 |
Tetrastigma leucostaphylum (Dennst.)
| Alston 1977: 539 |
Tetractomia tetrandrum (Roxb.) Merr., J. Straits Branch Roy. Asiat. Soc.
| Merr. 1917: 87 |
Melicope tetrandra
| Roxb., Fl. Ind. 1832: 257 |
Chloris polystachya
| Roxb., Fl. Ind. 1820: 332 |