Pheidole dasos, Salata & Fisher, 2020
|
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.949.51269 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:93BFA448-BB73-43CD-BC4E-A86090DA63D5 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CAD761EC-FFAC-4EC6-B80E-F4C0720AF757 |
|
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:CAD761EC-FFAC-4EC6-B80E-F4C0720AF757 |
|
treatment provided by |
|
|
scientific name |
Pheidole dasos |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Pheidole dasos sp. nov. Figs 28A-F View Figure 28 , 63J View Figure 63 , 65J View Figure 65
Type material.
Holotype. Madagascar. • 1 major worker; Antsiranana; Makirovana forest; -14.104, 50.03574; alt. 225 m; 4 May 2011; B. L. Fisher et al. leg.; rainforest, ex rotten log; BLF27046; CASENT0212441 (CASC). Paratype. • 1w.; same data as for holotype, CASENT0923284 (CASC).
Other material.
Madagascar. - Antsiranana: •1w., 1s.; Makirovana forest; -14.17066, 49.95409; alt. 415 m; 29 Apr 2011; B. L. Fisher et al. leg.; rainforest, ex rotten log; BLF26619 (CASC).
Diagnosis.
Moderately large species. Major workers. Head in full-face view sub-oval, not widening posteriorly, with anterior and posterior sides relatively straight, in lateral view sub-oval; ventral and dorsal faces convex; sides of the head with moderately dense, moderately long, subdecumbent to suberect pilosity; medial part of frons with thick, interrupted, sparse, and longitudinal rugae with indistinctly foveolate interspaces; anterolateral sides of frons with sparse, thick, and longitudinal rugae, posterolateral sides with rugae more irregular, interspaces with sparse foveolae; occipital lobes, and area posterolateral from eyes without smooth notches; scape, when laid back, exceeding the midlength of head by two-fifths of its length; inner hypostomal teeth distinct, large, closely spaced, triangular, with rounded apex directed upward; outer hypostomal teeth lobe-like, narrower, and approximately as high as inner teeth; inner and outer hypostomal teeth closely spaced and not connected by concavity; mesosoma rugofoveolate; dorsal promesonotum with additional thick and transverse rugae; lateral sides of pronotum with smooth notches; gaster smooth; body orange. Minor workers. Head foveolate; vertex and median frons with fading sculpture; area posterolateral from eyes smooth; antennal sockets with few indistinct, curved outward rugae and foveolate interspaces; scape, when laid back, exceeding the posterior head margin by one-third of its length; promesonotum low and moderately long; promesonotal groove absent; propodeal spines small and triangular; mesosoma predominantly smooth; lateral sides with very sparse and indistinct, thin rugulae; body brown.
Description.
Major workers. Measurements (N = 2): HL: 1.1, 1.14; HW: 1.04, 1.12; SL: 0.79, 0.81; EL: 0.16, 0.14; WL: 0.98, 1.05; PSL: 0.14, 0.15; MTL: 0.72, 0.77; PNW: 0.4, 0.45; PTW: 0.13, 0.13; PPW: 0.29, 0.31; CI: 105.9, 101.4; SI: 76.2, 72.6; PSLI: 12.4, 13.5; PPI: 45.8, 41.7; PNI: 38.8, 39.9; MTI: 68.8, 68.6.
Head. In full-face view sub-oval, not widening posteriorly, with anterior and posterior sides relatively straight (Fig. 28B View Figure 28 ). In lateral view sub-oval; ventral and dorsal faces convex; inner hypostomal teeth visible. Sides of the head with moderately dense, moderately long, subdecumbent to suberect pilosity; whole head with dense, long, decumbent to erect pilosity. Medial part of frons with thick, interrupted, sparse, and longitudinal rugae with indistinctly foveolate interspaces; anterolateral sides of frons with sparse, thick, and longitudinal rugae, posterolateral sides with rugae more irregular, interspaces with sparse foveolae. Occipital lobes with slightly thinner, sparse, and irregular rugae and smooth to indistinctly foveolate interspaces. Area posterolateral from eyes with denser and thinner longitudinal rugae with rugofoveolate interspaces. Gena with relatively sparse and thick, longitudinal rugae with distinctly rugofoveolate interspaces. Centre of clypeus smooth and shiny, lateral sides with indistinct rugulae; median notch present, moderately wide, and shallow; median longitudinal carina absent; lateral longitudinal carinae absent. Scape, when laid back, exceeding the midlength of head by two-fifths of its length; pilosity subdecumbent to erect (Fig. 28B, D View Figure 28 ). Inner hypostomal teeth distinct, large, closely spaced, triangular, with rounded apex directed upward; outer hypostomal teeth lobe-like, narrower than and approximately as high as inner teeth; inner and outer hypostomal teeth closely spaced and not connected by concavity (Fig. 63J View Figure 63 ). Mesosoma. In lateral view, promesonotum short, angular and moderately low, posterior mesonotum moderately steep, mesonotal process indistinct, tubercle-like; promesonotal groove absent; metanotal groove absent; propodeal spines short, with wide base and acute apex; humeral area produced (Fig. 28D View Figure 28 ). Surface shiny and rugofoveolate; dorsal promesonotum with additional thick and transverse rugae; lateral sides of pronotum with smooth notches. Pilosity moderately dense, long, and erect (Fig. 28D, F View Figure 28 ). Petiole. Shiny with dense foveolae; node finely foveolate, triangular, with rounded and thick apex, in rear view node dorsoventrally slightly convex; pilosity moderately sparse and erect (Fig. 28D, F View Figure 28 ). Postpetiole. Shiny and foveolate; dorsum with reduced sculpture and smooth notch; in dorsal view oval, lateral margins medially with two dentate projections; pilosity long, moderately sparse and erect (Fig. 28D, F View Figure 28 ). Gaster. Shiny and smooth; pilosity moderately dense, long and erect (Fig. 28D, F View Figure 28 ). Colour. Orange with yellowish legs (Fig. 28D, F View Figure 28 ).
Description.
Minor workers. Measurements (N = 2): HL: 0.56, 0.61; HW: 0.46, 0.49; SL: 0.71, 0.74; EL: 0.1, 0.1; WL: 0.74, 0.79; PSL: 0.08, 0.09; MTL: 0.57, 0.59; PNW: 0.31, 0.32; PTW: 0.09, 0.07; PPW: 0.12, 0.14; CI: 122.0, 122.7; SI: 153.6, 150.9; PSLI: 13.8, 15.4; PPI: 74.3, 52.9; PNI: 67.5, 65.7; MTI: 123.3, 120.5.
Head. Cephalic margin slightly convex (Fig. 28A View Figure 28 ). Pilosity relatively sparse, moderately long, subdecumbent to erect. Sculpture shiny and foveolate; vertex and median frons with fading sculpture; area posterolateral from eyes smooth; antennal sockets with few indistinct, curved outward rugae and foveolate interspaces. Clypeus with median longitudinal carina absent; two lateral longitudinal carinae absent. Scape, when laid back, exceeding the posterior head margin by one-third of its length; pilosity dense, subdecumbent to erect (Fig. 28A, C View Figure 28 ). Mesosoma. In lateral view, promesonotum low and moderately long, arched; promesonotal groove absent; metanotal groove distinct; propodeal spines small, triangular (Fig. 28C View Figure 28 ). Sculpture shiny and predominantly smooth; lateral sides with very sparse and indistinct, thin rugulae. Pilosity very sparse, moderately long, and erect (Fig. 28C, E View Figure 28 ). Gaster. With sparse, erect pilosity (Fig. 28C, E View Figure 28 ). Colour. Brown, legs and gaster brighter (Fig. 28C, E View Figure 28 ).
Etymology.
Greek for forest in reference to habitat preferences of the species.
Biology.
The species was collected between 225-415 m in elevation, in rainforest. Nests were located in rotten logs.
Comments.
Pheidole dasos sp. nov., described from Makirovana forest in Antsiranana, is most similar to P. hazo sp. nov., known from the vicinity of Andranoma in Antananarivo, and P. sparsa sp. nov., recorded so far only from Bemanevika in Mahajanga. Majors of P. dasos sp. nov. can be distinguished from both taxa by medial part of frons with moderately dense rugae with interspaces with indistinct foveolae, and pronotum predominantly sculptured with smooth notches on lateral sides; minors of P. dasos sp. nov. can be distinguished from P. sparsa sp. nov. and P. hazo sp. nov. by brown body colouration, longer scape exceeding the posterior head margin by one-third of its length, and predominantly smooth mesosoma with very sparse and indistinct, thin rugulae on lateral sides.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.