Aenictus, Emery, 1901
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5898821 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1D61E1C2-5FF1-4E47-B6C8-74F7E50D6B29 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5898233 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2C74010F-A00F-147E-FD1E-E737FE0D2F82 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Aenictus |
status |
|
rixator View in CoL species group
DIAGNOSIS. This is a convenience group, and a clear candidate to be split up when more data are available.
Small, yellow species with linear mandibles and almost parallel sides closing against the clypeus. This very reduced, transverse to almost absent pronotum and mesonotum forming almost a straight line; mesopropodeal suture present dorsally but not deeply impressed. Femora and tibiae with its apical half swollen. Overall sculpture glassy smooth.
Species in this group could be mistaken by its size and habitus with minima workers in the mariae complex, but can be separated by the linear mandibles and absence of denticulated clypeus. Its heads are also less elongated (CI~90 against CI~80) for the same HW range (~0.40) in the mariae group.
OVERVIEW. The difference between A. rixator ( Fig. 30 A–D View Fig ) and A. mentu ( Fig. 28 A–D View Fig ) is quite straightforward as the first has three mandibular teeth and a clearly defined propodeal ridge, and the second lacks the propodeal ridge and has a big apical tooth followed by three smaller denticles.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |