Brachychthonius italicus spiciger Berlese
publication ID |
ORI111 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6285302 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2B413E82-58F4-107B-9454-A01320219905 |
treatment provided by |
Thomas (2012-01-18 09:45:07, last updated 2024-11-29 09:16:28) |
scientific name |
Brachychthonius italicus spiciger Berlese |
status |
|
Brachychthonius italicus spiciger Berlese , 1910
Brachychthonius brevis var. spiciger Berlese , 1910, p. 220.
Brachychthonius italicus spiciger , Jacot, 1936c, p. 349, fig. 7.
Brachychochthonius italicus spiciger , Jacot, 1938b, p. 132.
Berlese described this american form as a variety of B. brevis Berlese (non Michael). I studied slide no 83/10 from Lake City, Florida, which probably is the type. This specimen is only slightly different from B. italicus and I agree with Jacot that it must be considered a subspecies of B. italicus ; Forsslund (in litt.) kindly informed me that he is of the same opinion.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
InfraOrder |
Enarthronota |
Family |
|
Genus |
Brachychthonius italicus spiciger Berlese
van der Hammen, L. 1959 |
Brachychochthonius italicus spiciger
Jacot 1938 |
1 (by thomas, 2012-01-18 09:45:07)
2 (by thomas, 2012-05-03 09:00:29)
3 (by admin, 2014-04-16 01:47:20)
4 (by admin, 2014-04-16 01:47:20)
5 (by admin, 2014-04-16 01:47:20)
6 (by admin, 2014-04-16 01:47:20)
7 (by GgEditorBatch, 2019-03-29 14:43:57)
8 (by ExternalLinkService, 2019-09-26 19:25:36)
9 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-01-31 02:28:37)
10 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-02-25 18:56:30)
11 (by plazi, 2023-11-30 03:05:50)