Epimeria, Costa in Hope, 1851
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2024.2374404 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13784994 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2A3B87F7-FFBB-FFC9-FE51-7323FD48FE95 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Epimeria |
status |
|
Genus Epimeria View in CoL Costa in Hope 1851
Vertumnus White, 1847: 89 View in CoL [nomen nudum]
Epimeria View in CoL Costa in Hope 1851: 46. – Karaman and J.L. Barnard, 1979: 108. – Watling and Holman 1980: 642. – J.L. Barnard and Karaman 1991: 393. – d’Udekem d’Acoz and Verheye, 2007: 14 (see for an extensive synonym list).
Diagnosis (based on J.L. Barnard and Karaman 1991; d’Udekem d’Acoz and Verheye 2017)
Body smooth or covered with teeth or processes; processes on pereonites just above connection with coxae, if present, small, not sword-like, not forming large longitudinal carinae. Head high; lateral cephalic lobes very reduced; inferior antennal sinus very shallow; ventral lobe well developed, oriented obliquely downwards, sharp or rounded; rostrum variable, usually well developed, sometimes small or even tiny. Antenna 1 peduncle article 2 shorter than article 1. Mouthparts projecting quadrately. Upper lip almost entire. Epistome not very broad. Lower lip inner lobes absent, outer lobes relatively broad. Mandible incisor toothed, accessory setal row present, molar blunt, strong and triturative. Maxilla 1 palp 2-articulate. Maxilla 2 inner plate without facial row of setae. Maxilliped inner plate narrower than outer; palp article 2 narrow and apicomedially unproduced, article 4 well developed, sometimes absent, with distal nail. Coxae 1–4 progressively longer. Gnathopods 1–2 similar, simple or subchelate; carpus and propodus elongate. Urosomite 1 always with dorsal process, which can be rounded or tooth like, projecting upwards or backwards. Telson usually distinctly incised or cleft, rarely weakly emarginate or entire, without spines or setae. [See d’Udekem d’Acoz and Verheye (2017: 14), for an extensive descriptive diagnosis].
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Amphilochidea |
Family |
Epimeria
Souza-Filho, Jesser F., Guedes-Silva, Elkênita & Andrade, Luiz F. 2024 |
Epimeria
Barnard JL & Karaman GS 1991: 393 |
Watling L & Holman H 1980: 642 |
Hope FG 1851: 46 |
Vertumnus
White A 1847: 89 |