Centromeria inflata, Song & Webb & Liang, 2016

Song, Zhi-Shun, Webb, Michael D. & Liang, Ai-Ping, 2016, Phylogenetic analysis of the Oriental genera of Orthopagini Emeljanov, 1983 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Dictyopharidae: Dictyopharinae), with a systematic revision of the genus Centromeria Stål, 1870, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 178 (1), pp. 33-87 : 70-71

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1111/zoj.12401

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2A0F87C6-FFDA-FFC8-8A24-9140003BF940

treatment provided by

Marcus

scientific name

Centromeria inflata
status

sp. nov.

CENTROMERIA INFLATA View in CoL SP. NOV.

FIGS 2D View Figure 2 , 17A – I View Figure 17

Type specimens. Holotype: ♂, Philippines, Camarines Sur, Mount Isarog , 500 – 1200 m a.s.l., 27.iv.1963, H.M. Torrevillas ( BPBM).

Paratype: Philippines, 1♂, Camarines Sur, Mount Iriga , 500 – 600 m a.s.l., 1.iv.1962, H.M. Torrevillas ( BPBM) .

Etymology. This new species name is derived from the Latin ‘ inflatus ’, referring to its distinctly apically inflated and bulbous frons.

Diagnosis. This species can be distinguished from other known Centromeria species by its cephalic process being inflated and bulbous apically.

Description. BL, ♂ 17.8 – 18.6 mm; HL, 2.7 – 2.9 mm; HW, 1.8 – 1.9 mm; TL, 13.4 – 14.0 mm.

Cephalic process in lateral view elongate, distinctly longer than length from anterior margins of eyes to posterior margin of vertex; moderately upturned and ascending at about 30° ( Fig. 17B View Figure 17 ); apex not narrowed in front of eyes ( Fig. 17A View Figure 17 ) and differing from other Centromeria species because of apex of frons inflated ( Fig. 17C View Figure 17 ). Vertex relatively broad, posterior margin nearly as wide as transverse diameter of eyes; in dorsal view ratio of length to width between eyes about 3.3: 1 ( Fig. 17A View Figure 17 ); lateral carinae moderately constricted and moderately upturned in front of eyes ( Fig. 17A View Figure 17 ). Frons ( Fig. 17C View Figure 17 ) with apex distinctly inflated and bulbous, clearly visible in dorsal view ( Fig. 17A View Figure 17 ). Fore femora with a distinct minute spine near apex; hind tibiae with seven or eight lateral spines; hind tarsomeres I with ten apical teeth and tarsomeres II with between ten and 12 apical teeth.

Male genitalia with pygofer in lateral view broad and high, with ratio of ventral to dorsal width about 2.0: 1; posterior margin with a small, narrow, and straight process near middle, apex obtuse ( Fig. 17E View Figure 17 ). Gonostyles ( Fig. 17E View Figure 17 ) with upper process large and stout, slightly acute apically. Aedeagus ( Fig. 17G – I View Figure 17 ) moderately large, with one pair of long and stout endosomal processes extended posteriorly and curved dorsally ( Fig. 17H View Figure 17 ); phallobase sclerotized and pigmented at base, membranous and inflated apically, with two pairs of ventrolateral lobes covered with numerous small and short spines ( Fig. 17H, I View Figure 17 ), and one pair of ventral lobes narrow and long, directed posteriorly, without spines ( Fig. 17I View Figure 17 ). Segment X in dorsal view large and broad, nearly rounded, with ratio of length to width near middle about 1.3: 1 ( Fig. 17D View Figure 17 ).

Distribution. Philippines (Camarines Sur).

CENTROMERIA INSPINATA HAUPT, 1917 View in CoL

FIGS 2E View Figure 2 , 18A – C View Figure 18

Centromeria inspinata Haupt, 1917: 307 View in CoL ; Metcalf, 1946: 37.

Material examined. Indonesia, 1♀, Celebes [Sulawesi], Paleleh , 15.xii.1930, G. Heinrich ; 1♀, Celebes [Sulawesi], Ile-ile , 500 – 800 m a.s.l., Anf. xii.1930, G. Heinrich ( MFNB) .

Distribution. Indonesia (Sulawesi).

Remarks. This species was described by Haupt (1917) based on two female specimens from Minahassa, Celebes. We could not examine its types and identified it in the present samples based on similar external morphology and locality. The species is very similar to C. speilinea , but can be distinguished from the latter by the fore femora without spine near apex ( Haupt, 1917).

CENTROMERIA LONGIPENNIS ( WALKER, 1851) View in CoL

FIGS 2F View Figure 2 , 19A – I View Figure 19

Dictyophora [sic] longipennis Walker, 1851: 316 View in CoL . Holotype: ♂, Philippines (BMNH) (examined).

Centromeria longipennis (Walker) View in CoL : Stål, 1870: 745; Melichar, 1912: 43; Metcalf, 1946: 37.

Dictyophora [sic] surgens Walker, 1870: 101 View in CoL . Holotype: ♀, Indonesia (Amboina) (BMNH) (examined). Synonymized by Melichar, 1912: 43. (Error)

Dictyophara nigroapicata Lethierry, 1888: 467 View in CoL . Holotype: ♂, Indonesia (Nias) (MNHN) (examined). Synonymized by Melichar, 1912: 43. (Error)

Centromeria bicolorata Bierman, 1910: 14 View in CoL . Holotype ♂, Indonesia (Java) (NCB Naturalis) (examined). Synonymized by Melichar, 1912: 43. (Error) Redescription. BL, ♂ 15.8 mm; HL, 2.1 mm; HW, 1.5 mm; TL, 12.3 mm.

Male genitalia with pygofer in lateral view narrow and high, with ratio of ventral to dorsal width about 2.4: 1; posterior process near middle elongate, slender, and straight, obtuse apically ( Fig. 19E View Figure 19 ). Gonostyles ( Fig. 19E View Figure 19 ) relatively large, upper process elongate, acute apically. Aedeagus ( Fig. 19G – I View Figure 19 ) small, endosomal processes extended posteriorly and curved dorsoanteriorly, apical one-third membranous, acute apically ( Fig. 19H View Figure 19 ); phallobase sclerotized and pigmented at lateral sides, membranous and moderately inflated dorsally and ventrally, with one pair of ventral lobes short and small, without spines ( Fig. 19H, I View Figure 19 ). Segment X in dorsal view large and elongate, with ratio of length to width near middle about 1.6: 1 ( Fig. 19D View Figure 19 ).

Type material examined. Holotype ♂ of Dictyophora longipennis Walker, 1851 , [ Philippines], Phil Isla, Type, Dictyophora longipennis (BMNH) .

Other material examined. Philippines, 1♂, P.I., Misamis Or., Mount Empagatao , 1050 – 1200 m a.s.l., Rain forest, 19 – 30.iv.1961, H. Torrevillas ( BPBM) .

Distribution. Philippines (northern Mindanao).

Remarks. The locality for this species was given only as ‘Philippine Islands’ by Walker (1851). Melichar (1912) listed it also from Indonesia (Nias, Sumatra, and Amboina), but our results show that C. longipennis redescribed by Melichar (1912) was a misidentification. This species is similar to C. nigroapicata , but can be separated from the latter by the tegmina without fuscous spot on the apical region and the posterior process of the pygofer slender and straight, obtuse apically.

BPBM

Bishop Museum

MFNB

Museo Friulano di Storia Naturale

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Dictyopharidae

Genus

Centromeria

Loc

Centromeria inflata

Song, Zhi-Shun, Webb, Michael D. & Liang, Ai-Ping 2016
2016
Loc

Centromeria inspinata

Metcalf ZP 1946: 37
Haupt H 1917: 307
1917
Loc

Centromeria bicolorata

Melichar L 1912: 43
Bierman CJH 1910: 14
1910
Loc

Dictyophara nigroapicata

Melichar L 1912: 43
Lethierry LF 1888: 467
1888
Loc

Centromeria longipennis (Walker)

Metcalf ZP 1946: 37
Melichar L 1912: 43
Stal C 1870: 745
1870
Loc

Dictyophora [sic] surgens

Melichar L 1912: 43
Walker F 1870: 101
1870
Loc

Dictyophora [sic] longipennis

Walker F 1851: 316
1851
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF