Naticidae, Guilding, 1834

Petit, Richard E., 2010, The magellanic mollusca of Rochebrune and Mabille, Zootaxa 2723, pp. 41-65 : 47-48

Naticidae

Natica couteaudi Rochebrune & Mabille, 1885: 102 .

Locality: “Santa-Cruz Patagoniae.”

Remarks: Not in Rochebrune & Mabille 1889. Not mentioned by Forcelli (2000). Possibly a fossil as it is stated to be destitute of color.

Natica lebruni Rochebrune & Mabille, 1885: 102 .

Locality: “Santa-Cruz Patagoniae (M. Lebrun).”

Remarks: Not included in Rochebrune & Mabille 1889. Not mentioned by Forcelli (2000). Listed by Rosenberg (2005) as a “dubious species.”

Natica omoia Rochebrune & Mabille, 1885: 103 .

Locality: “Santa-Cruz Patagoniae in tellure tertiaria.”

Remarks: A fossil species. Placed in synonymy of Polynices [sic] secunda (Roch. & Mab.) by Ihering (1907: 155).

Natica payeni Rochebrune & Mabille, 1885: 104 , pl. 3, fig. 6.

Natica payeni Rochebrune & Mabille, 1885 – Forcelli (2000: 78).

Locality: “Cap Horn.”

Remarks: Forcelli (2000: 78) reproduced the original figure.

Natica recognita Mabille & Rocheburne in Rochebrune & Mabille, 1889: H.3, pl. 3, figs. 5a–b.

Locality: “Au sud du Cap Horn; baie Orange; par une profondeur de 120m. ”

Remarks: Placed in synonymy of Polinices patagonicus (Philippi, 1847 [sic; = 1845]) by Forcelli (2000: 77).

Natica secunda Rochebrune & Mabille, 1885: 103 .

Polynices [sic] secunda (Roch. & Mab.) – Ihering (1907: 155).

Locality: “In tellure tertiaria prope Santa-Cruz Patagoniae.” Listed as a Polinices by Forcelli (2000: 77) with the comment that it has not been cited from the Magallanic Province.

Remarks: A fossil species.