Discorhabdella atypica, Ott & Mcdaniel & Humphrey, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5463.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FDB4CE85-B07E-49C7-AABF-A67914F17E6B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11611216 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9C09DEC7-22EE-458A-B2C6-E15BE31B3CD7 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:9C09DEC7-22EE-458A-B2C6-E15BE31B3CD7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Discorhabdella atypica |
status |
sp. nov. |
Discorhabdella atypica n. sp.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:9C09DEC7-22EE-458A-B2C6-E15BE31B3CD7
Figure 9 View FIGURE 9
Diagnosis. Thin encrusting, skeletal architecture and spicules typical of the genus except the possession of regular acanthostyles rather than pseudastros ones.
Etymology The species name refers to the atypical (for the genus) acanthostyles.
Material Examined Holotype RBCM 024-00008 View Materials - 002 View Materials , Stn NM 405 , Defence Isl, Howe Sd, BC, 49° 34.511’ N / 123° 16.425’ W, coll. N. McDaniel, 14 Dec 2019, 15 m depth, 1 specimen GoogleMaps . Paratypes RBCM 018-00171 View Materials - 001 View Materials , Stn NM 257 , Defence Isl, Howe Sd ., BC, 49° 34.544’ N 123° 16.632’ W, coll. N. McDaniel, D. Swanston, 19 May 2011, 9 m depth GoogleMaps , 1 specimen; RBCM 024-00010 View Materials - 003 View Materials , Stn NM 395 , Defence Isl (E), Howe Sd ., BC, 49° 34.511’ N / 123° 16.425’ W, coll. N. McDaniel, 24 Sept 2019, 15 m depth GoogleMaps , 1 specimen; RBCM 024-00008 View Materials - 003 View Materials , Stn NM 406 , Defence Isl, Howe Sd ., BC, 49° 34.511’ N / 123° 16.425’ W, coll. N. McDaniel, 14 Dec 2019, 15 m depth GoogleMaps , 1 specimen, RBCM 018-00392 View Materials - 001 View Materials , Stn KML 20/76, Jervis Inlet, 49° 56.6’ N / 123° 58.7’ W, coll. W. Austin, 15 Mar 1976, “shallow”, 1 specimen GoogleMaps .
Description
External ( Figure 9A View FIGURE 9 ) Holotype RBCM 024-00008-002. Sponge encrusting approximately 6 cm diameter x 1.5 mm thick. Subdermal radial canals leading to oscula usually visible in living specimens. Ostia not visible in the in-situ photographs or in preserved specimens. Ostia densely scattered, 0.45–0.9 mm diameter. Surface smooth, microhispid; spicules protrude up to 100 µm. Colour in life bright orange, varying occasionally to scarlet red. Consistency easily torn.
Skeleton ( Figure 9B View FIGURE 9 ) Skeleton is hymedesmioid with acanthostyles anchored in the spongin base, heads down. Subtylostyles form a dense palisade in the ectosome in places separated from the base with large aquiferous canals or continuing to the base in multispicular tracts as part of the choanosome. Tylostyles are spaced randomly among the subtylostyles. Subtylostyles project beyond the surface 50 µm; tylostyles project 80 to 150 µm. Microscleres are located below the surface scattered throughout the sponge.
Spicules ( Figures 9C, D, E, F, G and H View FIGURE 9 ) Subtylostyles, tylostyles, acanthostyles, anchorate unguiferous isochelas and sigmas. Subtylostyles ( Figures 9C, D View FIGURE 9 ) straight, slightly fusiform, oval heads variably thick (may be subterminal), hastate sharp apices, some slightly mucronate, dimension range 137–515 x 7.8–19.5 µm. Tylostyles ( Figure 9E View FIGURE 9 ): straight or slightly curved tapering uniformly to a rounded apex. Head formed by a crown of rounded protuberances which may be slightly subterminal, dimension range 452– 1620 x 20.8–104 µm. Acanthostyles ( Figure 9F View FIGURE 9 ) large spined head, spines may be concentrated in two whorls, one sub-apical and one median (not shown); alternately more or less continuous along the shaft ( Figure 9F View FIGURE 9 ), or unspined for the pointed ¼ of the shaft; heads broad with small spines pointing vertically on top, larger and horizontally on sides and slightly downward toward the apex on the underside of the head, dimension range 65.0–148 x 20.8–72.8 µm. Anchorate unguiferous multidentate isochelas ( Figure 9G View FIGURE 9 ) shallow curve, short narrow alae (1/4 chord length or less), dimension range 13.0–28.6 µm. Sigmas ( Figure 9H View FIGURE 9 ) simple or contort, dimension range 10.4–20.8 µm. Trichodragmas of microxeas (not microrhabds) rarely present, may be foreign. There is no evidence of spines on the SEMs of microxeas which are typical for the genus (Van Soest 2002 [2004]c). Table 8 compares spicule dimensions of specimens examined.
Distribution. All specimens obtained were from Howe Sd, BC; 9–15 m depth.
Ecology Forms thin encrustations on bedrock and barnacles, up to 20 cm in diameter.
Remarks The BC species of Discorhabdella lacks pseudastrose acanthostyles with subapical spined whorls characteristic of other Discorhabdella species except D. tuberosocapitata ( Topsent, 1890) which has club-shaped acanthostyles based on Topsent’s figure ( Topsent, 1892, p. 113, pl. XI, f. 6; Hooper, 1996, p. 36, f. 12E–G; Van Soest, 2002 [2004]c, p. 552, f. 2C) and two species from Japan: D. hispida Ise, Vacelet, Izumi, Woo & Tan, 2021 and D. misakiensis Ise, Vacelet, Izumi, Woo & Tan, 2021 . Discorhabdella tuberosocapitata ’s skeletal architecture differs from D. atypica n. sp. in having the large tuberose tylostyles surrounded at the surface by tuberose acanthostyles rather than the subtylostyles in D. atypica n. sp. (Van Soest, 2002 [2004]c,). Both Japanese species are thin encrusting. D. misakiensis lacks sigmas. Discorhabdella hispida is similar to our specimen but has a more pronounced hispid surface, is greenish in colour and lacks the subdermal radial canals of D. atypica n. sp.; as well D. hispida sigmas are a complex S-shape closer to that of flagellosigmas and unlike the simple C-sigmas of D. atypica n. sp. Topsent’s species and both Japanese species were from deep water (550–736 m and 113–318 m, respectively). Discorhabdella atypica n. sp. is a range extension of the genus from Panama in the Northeast Pacific and a depth extension from 55 m up to 9 m depth.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |