Bathysiredon dumerilii queretarensis Maldonado Koerdell, 1948

Flores-Villela, Oscar, Ríos-Muñoz, César A., Magaña-Cota, Gloria E. & Quezadas-Tapia, Néstor L., 2016, Alfredo Dugès’ type specimens of amphibians and reptiles revisited, Zootaxa 4092 (1) : 45

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4092.1.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BFAA8A37-46EE-4E8D-A86E-CA9B782E302A

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6062485

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/25228795-3109-FFDD-A49C-FF6A5A45B855

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Bathysiredon dumerilii queretarensis Maldonado Koerdell, 1948
status

 

Bathysiredon dumerilii queretarensis Maldonado Koerdell, 1948 View in CoL

Maldonado Koerdell (1948b) reported two specimens that Smith & Necker (1943) described as Ambystoma larvae. These specimens were labeled from “San Juan del Río, Guanajuato”, according to Smith & Necker (1943). But Maldonado Koerdell (1948b) stated that they were from “San Juan del Río (Qro.)”, arguing that Smith & Necker (1943) put them in the state of Guanajuato rather than in Queretaro, where a city called San Juan del Río is well known. Although there is a small town named San Juan del Río in the state of Guanajuato, in the municipality of Pénjamo (N 20.314029º, W 101.734933º, INEGI 2015) we do not believe that the specimens could have come from this locality, because there is no a lake there (only a dam, probably recently built) and the population of this town is only 38 (http://www.microrregiones.gob.mx/catloc/contenido.aspx?refnac=110230632).

Maldonado Koerdell referred to these specimens as cotypes (syntypes) and described them; they are catalogued as HE 1184–1185 ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9. A D, 10A). Brandon (1992) questioned the validity of this taxon and provides ample discussion on the matter. We concur with Brandon (1992) that this taxon should be synonymized with A. dumerilii . However, the specimens shown in Figures 9 View FIGURE 9. A D, 10A do not coincide with Maldonado-Koerdell’s description; one of us (OFV, personal notes) checked the holotypes in 1985 and his recollection is that they looked like A. dumerilii . We do not believe that specimens HE 1184–1185 ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9. A D, 10A) correspond to the taxon in question. Our conclusion is that both syntypes are lost.

Current valid name: Ambystoma dumerilii (Dugès, 1870) .

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Amphibia

Order

Caudata

Family

Ambystomatidae

Genus

Bathysiredon

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF