Prosopis imperialis Smith, 1863
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2025.1028.3129 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:06182A07-5DB6-4916-86AF-673865690CE2 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/251C1E7D-FFF2-1625-FDFA-175BFAF852EA |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Prosopis imperialis Smith, 1863 |
| status |
|
74. Prosopis imperialis Smith, 1863
Fig. 73
Prosopis imperialis Smith, 1863: 44–45 , ♀.
Type material examined
Holotype
INDONESIA • ♀; Dor. 10. [Dory]; [ 11 Apr.–29 Jul. 1858]; OUMNH, ENT-HYME2828 .
Type locality
Dory [= Dore Bay, now Manokwari, Doberai Peninsula, West Papua].
Notes
The specimen is labelled “Dor. 10”. Examination of Wallace’s 3rd notebook ( Beccaloni 2025) reveals the following information under “Dorey. (N. Guinea).. Notes on Miscellaneous.”:
“Bee? stings acutely but soon goes off - at flowers.”
This presumably refers to P. imperialis , with its hylaeine and relatively hairless morphology possibly causing Wallace’s uncertainty as to whether or not it was truly a bee.
Hirashima (1980: 114) and Baker (1993: 229) note that Michener (1965: 146) incorrectly listed the NHMUK as the type depository for this species (type 17a, 2835). This specimen bears only a printed rectangular label reading “Dory”, and was not labelled by Smith. It cannot therefore be regarded as a valid type specimen, lacking labels by either collector or describer. Baker (1993: 230) identified the OUMNH specimen as the holotype and stated that he labelled it, but we found no type label; this has now been rectified. Smith (1863: 45) notes that he forgot to describe this species in his 1860b paper, and so it joins Megachile alecto (Section 59) as the only other species described based on Wallacean material from Manokwari.
Current status
Palaeorhiza ( Hadrorhiza) imperialis (Smith, 1863) ( Hirashima 1980) .
Distribution
Indonesia (Southwest Papua) and Papua New Guinea ( Hirashima 1980; Ascher & Pickering 2024).
| NHMUK |
Natural History Museum, London |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Prosopis imperialis Smith, 1863
| Wood, T. J., Risch, S., Orr, M. C. & Hogan, J. E. 2025 |
Prosopis imperialis
| Smith 1863: 44 - 45 |
