Nomia flavipes Smith, 1858
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2025.1028.3129 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:06182A07-5DB6-4916-86AF-673865690CE2 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/251C1E7D-FFB1-1664-FDE0-137AFB915037 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Nomia flavipes Smith, 1858 |
| status |
|
29. Nomia flavipes Smith, 1858
Fig. 30
Nomia flavipes Smith, 1858a: 5 View in CoL , ♀.
Type material examined
Holotype
INDONESIA • ♀; Mak. [ Makassar , Sulawesi]; [ 2 Sep.–18 Dec. 1856]; OUMNH, ENT-HYME2788 .
Type locality
Celebes [= Sulawesi].
Notes
Baker (1993: 200) wrote the following:
“A ♀ labelled ‘Mak.’ [blue disc] and ‘ Nomia flavipes Smith’ [blue rectangular label] standing as flavipes in the UMO type collection is the HOLOTYPE of this species and it has now been labelled accordingly. The type is much broken and has been crudely ‘repaired’; some detached leg segments adhere to the data label”.
The specimen was not labelled as holotype; this has now been rectified. Baker treated the name L. flavipes as senior to L. deliense ( Strand, 1910) , which was described from Sumatra as Halictus deliensis ( Strand 1910: 188) . The nomenclatural status of flavipes is complex. The specimen itself belongs to the genus Lasioglossum ( Ctenonomia) , and as such would nominally have precedence over the currently used name L. deliense . However, Cockerell (1922: 662) considered flavipes Smith to be in the genus Halictus Latreille, 1804 and hence a junior secondary homonym of Halictus flavipes (Fabricius, 1787) . The replacement name Halictus latebralis Cockerell, 1922 was proposed. Blüthgen (1926: 537–538) listed both Halictus flavipes (Smith) and Halictus latebralis Cockerell under Halictus deliense Strand. Blüthgen (1926) also dated the publication year of Halictus deliense as “1909 (1910)”, whereas Baker (1993) dated it as 1910.
Under ICZN (1999) Article 59.3, even though flavipes Smith is not currently considered to be part of the genus Halictus , a junior secondary homonym replaced before 1961 is permanently invalid unless the substitute name is not in use and the relevant taxa are no longer considered congeneric. As L. deliense is in use (e.g., Blüthgen 1926; Ascher et al. 2022), it should be maintained as the valid name.
Current status
Lasioglossum ( Ctenonomia) deliense ( Strand, 1910) ( Blüthgen 1926; Ascher & Pickering 2024; J. Gardner pers. com.).
Distribution
India ( Sikkim), Malaysia (Peninsula), Singapore, Indonesia ( Sumatra, Java, Kalimantan, Sulawesi), Philippines ( Blüthgen 1926; Ascher et al. 2022; Ascher & Pickering 2024).
| UMO |
University of Maine |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Nomia flavipes Smith, 1858
| Wood, T. J., Risch, S., Orr, M. C. & Hogan, J. E. 2025 |
Nomia flavipes
| Smith F. 1858: 5 |
