Shairella aeneipennis Chûjô
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4268.4.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:09694256-604A-4587-9C06-6BC16C048287 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6043292 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/207887EF-2B08-B740-27F7-FE6716ED3479 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Shairella aeneipennis Chûjô |
status |
|
( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 )
Shairella aeneipennis Chûjô, 1962: 105 ; Wilcox, 1973: 443 (catalogue); Kimoto & Chu, 1996: 61 (catalogue); Kimoto & Takizawa, 1997: 388; Beenen, 2010: 487 (catalogue).
Khasia itorum Kimoto, 1984: 56 ; Kimoto & Chu, 1996: 61 (as synonym of Shairella aeneipennis ). Synonym confirmed.
Type locality. Chiayi County, Chushan (ṞƜ), 23°30’44”N, 120°49’22”E, 2400 m. GoogleMaps
Types. Shairella aeneipennis . Holotype ♂ ( TARI): “ Iwai-yama (= Chushan, ṞƜ) / Mt. Arisan ( ȐHƜ) / Tainan-syu / FORMOSA / 6.viii.1940 / Col. K . ENDO [p, w] // Shairella / aeneipennis / CHÛJÔ [h] / DET. M. CHUJO [p, w] // HoLo / Type [p, w] (circle label, red letters but faded) // 2315 [p, w]”.
Khasia itorum . Holotype ♀ ( OMNH): “Mt. ALI ( ȐHƜ) / TAIWAN / 17.V.1981 / T. ITO [p, y] // Khasia / itoi / Kimoto , n. sp. [h, w] // HOLOTYPE [p, r]” . Paratypes: 2♂ ( KMNH, OMNH): “Mt. ALI / TAIWAN / 17.V.1981 / T. ITO [p, y] // Khasia / itoi / Kimoto, n. sp. [h, w] // PARATOPOTYPE [p, b] // PHOTO [p, r]” ; 1♂ ( KMNH): “Mt. ALI / TAIWAN / 18.V.1981 / N. ITO [p, y] // Khasia / itoi / Kimoto , n. sp. [h, w] // PARATYPE [p, b] // (blank) [w]”.
Additional specimens examined (n= 34). Chiayi: 6♂ , 3♀ (TARI, RBCN), Alishan (ȐHƜ), 17.V.2010, leg. M.-H. Tsou; 1♂, 1♀ ( TARI), Erhwanping (ΞΑ‼, near Alishan), 9.V.2011, leg. T.- H. Lee & M.- H. Tsou; Nantou : 1♂ (TARI), Hsitou (ĀḆ), 14.VI.2011, leg. T.-H. Lee; 1♂ (TARI), 24-31.VII.2008, leg. C.-S. Tung; Tatachia (Ṙ Ṙffi), 1♂, 5♀ ( TARI), same locality, 8.VI.2009, leg. C.- F. Lee ; 5♂, 4♀ ( TARI), same locality, 20.VII.2009, leg. C.- F. Lee, H. Lee & S.- F. Yu ; 1♀ ( TARI), same locality, 21.IX.2009, leg. C.- F. Lee ; 4♂, 1♀ ( TARI), same locality, 16.V.2010, leg. M.- H. Tsou ; 1♂ ( TARI), same locality, 9.VII.2014, leg. C.- F. Lee.
Males. Length 4.7–5.2 mm; width 2.9–3.1 mm. Antenna ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 A) long, filiform, about 1.2x longer than body, length ratios of antennomeres I–XI 1.0: 0.3: 0.7: 1.0: 0.9: 1.0: 1.0: 1.0: 1.0: 0.9: 0.9, length to width ratios of antennomeres I–XI 3.1: 1.5: 2.7: 3.4: 3.4: 4.2: 4.4: 4.2: 4.5: 4.3: 4.7. Elytra strongly widened apically; about 1.1x longer than wide; surface with sparse, fine punctures. Apical margin of last abdominal ventrite with two well developed incisions. Penis ( Figs 2 View FIGURE 2 C–2D) elongate, about 5.8x longer than wide, parallel-sided, apex narrowly rounded, strongly curved in lateral view; endophallic sclerite short, about 0.5x as long as penis, slender and longitudinal, apex rounded, with dense, short hairs along lateral margin at apical 1/4, bifurcate at basal 1/4.
Females. Length 5.0– 5.2 mm, width 3.0– 3.1 mm. Antenna ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 B) long, filiform, about 1.1x longer than body, length ratios of antennomeres I–XI 1.0: 0.3: 0.7: 0.9: 0.8: 0.8: 0.8: 0.8: 0.9: 0.8: 0.9, length to width ratios of antennomeres I–XI 3.6: 1.4: 3.1: 4.1: 3.9: 4.2: 3.9: 4.3: 5.0: 4.7: 5.8. Elytra strongly widened apically; about 1.1x longer than wide; surface with sparse, fine punctures. Apical margin of last abdominal ventrite truncate. Gonocoxae ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 E) longitudinal and wide, 3.1x longer than wide, conjoined from base to middle, slightly narrowed at apical 1/3, apices rounded, each gonocoxa with eight or nine elongate setae. Ventrite VIII ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 F) with only apical area and spiculum sclerotized; with dense, elongate setae inside apical sclerotized area, apical margin rounded; spiculum elongate, wide. Receptacle of spermatheca ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 G) slender, as wide as pump, hardly separated from pump; pump wide, strongly curved, apex broadly rounded, apex with transverse and short appendix, size variable ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 H); proximal spermathecal duct hardly separated from receptacle, apically narrowed.
Differential diagnosis. Shairella aeneipennis is similar to S. guoi sp. nov. and S. motienensis sp. nov. by possessing fine punctures on the elytra; but this species differs others by the shorter endophallic sclerite of the penis ( Figs 2 View FIGURE 2 C–2D) (longer endophallic sclerite in S. motiensis ( Figs 9 View FIGURE 9 C–9D)), rounded apex of the endophallic sclerite (depressed apex of the endophallic slcerite in S. guoi sp. nov. ( Figs 8 View FIGURE 8 C–8D) and pointed apex in S.
motiensis sp. nov.), and the narrowed apex of the penis (tapering apex from apical 1/ 6 in S. guoi sp. nov. and lanceolate apex in S. motienensis sp. nov.).
Remarks. The allotype of S. aenepennis is prooved to belong to another species (see S. tsoui sp. nov.). Host plant. Clinopodium laxiflorum var. taiwanianum Hsieh & Huang (Labiatae) . Distribution. Chiayi county: Alishan (ȐHƜ); Nantou county: Hsitou (ĀḆ) and Tatachia (ṘṘffi) ( Fig. View FIGURE 3
3A).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Shairella aeneipennis Chûjô
Lee, Chi-Feng & Beenen, Ron 2017 |
Shairella aeneipennis Chûjô, 1962: 105
Beenen 2010: 487 |
Kimoto 1997: 388 |
Kimoto 1996: 61 |
Khasia itorum
Kimoto 1996: 61 |
Kimoto 1984: 56 |