Shairella aeneipennis Chûjô

Lee, Chi-Feng & Beenen, Ron, 2017, Revision of the genus Shairella Chûjô, 1962 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae) from Taiwan, with descriptions of five new species, Zootaxa 4268 (4), pp. 489-507 : 492-494

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4268.4.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:09694256-604A-4587-9C06-6BC16C048287

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6043292

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/207887EF-2B08-B740-27F7-FE6716ED3479

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Shairella aeneipennis Chûjô
status

 

Shairella aeneipennis Chûjô

( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 )

Shairella aeneipennis Chûjô, 1962: 105 ; Wilcox, 1973: 443 (catalogue); Kimoto & Chu, 1996: 61 (catalogue); Kimoto & Takizawa, 1997: 388; Beenen, 2010: 487 (catalogue).

Khasia itorum Kimoto, 1984: 56 ; Kimoto & Chu, 1996: 61 (as synonym of Shairella aeneipennis ). Synonym confirmed.

Type locality. Chiayi County, Chushan (ṞƜ), 23°30’44”N, 120°49’22”E, 2400 m. GoogleMaps

Types. Shairella aeneipennis . Holotype ♂ ( TARI): “ Iwai-yama (= Chushan, ṞƜ) / Mt. Arisan ( ȐHƜ) / Tainan-syu / FORMOSA / 6.viii.1940 / Col. K . ENDO [p, w] // Shairella / aeneipennis / CHÛJÔ [h] / DET. M. CHUJO [p, w] // HoLo / Type [p, w] (circle label, red letters but faded) // 2315 [p, w]”.

Khasia itorum . Holotype ♀ ( OMNH): “Mt. ALI ( ȐHƜ) / TAIWAN / 17.V.1981 / T. ITO [p, y] // Khasia / itoi / Kimoto , n. sp. [h, w] // HOLOTYPE [p, r]” . Paratypes: 2♂ ( KMNH, OMNH): “Mt. ALI / TAIWAN / 17.V.1981 / T. ITO [p, y] // Khasia / itoi / Kimoto, n. sp. [h, w] // PARATOPOTYPE [p, b] // PHOTO [p, r]” ; 1♂ ( KMNH): “Mt. ALI / TAIWAN / 18.V.1981 / N. ITO [p, y] // Khasia / itoi / Kimoto , n. sp. [h, w] // PARATYPE [p, b] // (blank) [w]”.

Additional specimens examined (n= 34). Chiayi: 6♂ , 3♀ (TARI, RBCN), Alishan (ȐHƜ), 17.V.2010, leg. M.-H. Tsou; 1♂, 1♀ ( TARI), Erhwanping (ΞΑ‼, near Alishan), 9.V.2011, leg. T.- H. Lee & M.- H. Tsou; Nantou : 1♂ (TARI), Hsitou (ĀḆ), 14.VI.2011, leg. T.-H. Lee; 1♂ (TARI), 24-31.VII.2008, leg. C.-S. Tung; Tatachia (Ṙ Ṙffi), 1♂, 5♀ ( TARI), same locality, 8.VI.2009, leg. C.- F. Lee ; 5♂, 4♀ ( TARI), same locality, 20.VII.2009, leg. C.- F. Lee, H. Lee & S.- F. Yu ; 1♀ ( TARI), same locality, 21.IX.2009, leg. C.- F. Lee ; 4♂, 1♀ ( TARI), same locality, 16.V.2010, leg. M.- H. Tsou ; 1♂ ( TARI), same locality, 9.VII.2014, leg. C.- F. Lee.

Males. Length 4.7–5.2 mm; width 2.9–3.1 mm. Antenna ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 A) long, filiform, about 1.2x longer than body, length ratios of antennomeres I–XI 1.0: 0.3: 0.7: 1.0: 0.9: 1.0: 1.0: 1.0: 1.0: 0.9: 0.9, length to width ratios of antennomeres I–XI 3.1: 1.5: 2.7: 3.4: 3.4: 4.2: 4.4: 4.2: 4.5: 4.3: 4.7. Elytra strongly widened apically; about 1.1x longer than wide; surface with sparse, fine punctures. Apical margin of last abdominal ventrite with two well developed incisions. Penis ( Figs 2 View FIGURE 2 C–2D) elongate, about 5.8x longer than wide, parallel-sided, apex narrowly rounded, strongly curved in lateral view; endophallic sclerite short, about 0.5x as long as penis, slender and longitudinal, apex rounded, with dense, short hairs along lateral margin at apical 1/4, bifurcate at basal 1/4.

Females. Length 5.0– 5.2 mm, width 3.0– 3.1 mm. Antenna ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 B) long, filiform, about 1.1x longer than body, length ratios of antennomeres I–XI 1.0: 0.3: 0.7: 0.9: 0.8: 0.8: 0.8: 0.8: 0.9: 0.8: 0.9, length to width ratios of antennomeres I–XI 3.6: 1.4: 3.1: 4.1: 3.9: 4.2: 3.9: 4.3: 5.0: 4.7: 5.8. Elytra strongly widened apically; about 1.1x longer than wide; surface with sparse, fine punctures. Apical margin of last abdominal ventrite truncate. Gonocoxae ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 E) longitudinal and wide, 3.1x longer than wide, conjoined from base to middle, slightly narrowed at apical 1/3, apices rounded, each gonocoxa with eight or nine elongate setae. Ventrite VIII ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 F) with only apical area and spiculum sclerotized; with dense, elongate setae inside apical sclerotized area, apical margin rounded; spiculum elongate, wide. Receptacle of spermatheca ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 G) slender, as wide as pump, hardly separated from pump; pump wide, strongly curved, apex broadly rounded, apex with transverse and short appendix, size variable ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 H); proximal spermathecal duct hardly separated from receptacle, apically narrowed.

Differential diagnosis. Shairella aeneipennis is similar to S. guoi sp. nov. and S. motienensis sp. nov. by possessing fine punctures on the elytra; but this species differs others by the shorter endophallic sclerite of the penis ( Figs 2 View FIGURE 2 C–2D) (longer endophallic sclerite in S. motiensis ( Figs 9 View FIGURE 9 C–9D)), rounded apex of the endophallic sclerite (depressed apex of the endophallic slcerite in S. guoi sp. nov. ( Figs 8 View FIGURE 8 C–8D) and pointed apex in S.

motiensis sp. nov.), and the narrowed apex of the penis (tapering apex from apical 1/ 6 in S. guoi sp. nov. and lanceolate apex in S. motienensis sp. nov.).

Remarks. The allotype of S. aenepennis is prooved to belong to another species (see S. tsoui sp. nov.). Host plant. Clinopodium laxiflorum var. taiwanianum Hsieh & Huang (Labiatae) . Distribution. Chiayi county: Alishan (ȐHƜ); Nantou county: Hsitou (ĀḆ) and Tatachia (ṘṘffi) ( Fig. View FIGURE 3

3A).

TARI

Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute

ȐHƜ

Public Reference Library

OMNH

Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History

KMNH

Kitakyushu Museum and Institute of Natural History

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Chrysomelidae

Genus

Shairella

Loc

Shairella aeneipennis Chûjô

Lee, Chi-Feng & Beenen, Ron 2017
2017
Loc

Shairella aeneipennis Chûjô, 1962: 105

Beenen 2010: 487
Kimoto 1997: 388
Kimoto 1996: 61
1996
Loc

Khasia itorum

Kimoto 1996: 61
Kimoto 1984: 56
1984
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF