Mesabolivar cantharus, Machado & Yamamoto & Brescovit & Huber, 2007
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.1582.1.3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5098431 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/20080B04-3D4B-B742-2CBF-25BCFD47FBD1 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Mesabolivar cantharus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Mesabolivar cantharus View in CoL n. sp.
( Figs. 1–14 View FIGURES 1–14 )
Types. Male holotype from Parque Estadual da Cantareira (23° 25’ S; 46° 37’ W), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 12–17.V.2005, F. Yamamoto col. GoogleMaps with pitfall traps, deposited in IBSP 61393. Paratypes: 1 female ( IBSP 62402 View Materials ); 1 male and 1 female ( IBSP 62404 View Materials ); same data as holotype, 14–19.XI.2004 GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The species name is a noun in apposition, derived from the Latin word for jar, in reference to the jar (cântaro) commonly used to carry and store water from streams and riverheads in the 16 th and 17 th centuries at the type locality.
Diagnosis. The male is distinguished from the congeners by the shape of the cheliceral apophyses (large with a curved end: Figs. 3–5 View FIGURES 1–14 ) combined with the shape of the procursus, very curved ( Figs. 6–7 View FIGURES 1–14 ) and the tip with a prolateral projection ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1–14 ) and a retrolateral membranous projection ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 1–14 ). The female is distinguished by the projecting epigynum with a rounded, relatively large and shallow epigynal pocket ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 1–14 ).
Description. Male (Holotype). Total length 2.4, carapace width 1.0; leg I: 18.2 (5.0 + 0.4 + 5.2 + 6.3 + 1.3), tibia II: 2.5, tibia III: 2.1, tibia IV: 3.1, tibia I L/d: 40. Habitus as in figs. 1–2. Carapace light brown, very similar in shape to M. forceps Machado, Brescovit, Candiani & Huber, 2007 ; sternum light ochre. Distinct thoracic groove. Eight eyes on slightly elevated ocular area ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–14 ); distance PME–ALE about 60% of PME diameter. Chelicerae light brown, basal segment with a pair of large parallel frontal apophyses with strongly curved ends ( Figs. 3–5 View FIGURES 1–14 ). These apophyses are approximately perpendicular to the chelicerae ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1–14 ). Palps as in figs. 6–10. Coxa with prominent and approximately rectangular retrolateral apophysis ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1–14 ). Femur proximally with distinct round retrolateral apophysis and small proximal dorsal hump ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1–14 ). Procursus dark brown, strongly curved proximally, with strong proximal-prolateral hair ( Figs. 6–7 View FIGURES 1–14 ). Distinct tip of procursus, enlarged laterally and strongly sclerotized, with a prolateral apophysis ( Figs. 7–8 View FIGURES 1–14 ) and a retrolateral semitransparent membranous projection ( Figs. 6–8 View FIGURES 1–14 ). Bulb with small transparent projection ( Figs. 9–10 View FIGURES 1–14 ), embolar division of bulb long and dorsally bent, membranous ventrally. Legs light brown; without spines, vertical or curved hairs. Tarsus I with approximately 24 pseudosegments. Opisthosoma globular, pale green, with several lateral bluish-green spots ( Figs. 1–2 View FIGURES 1–14 ).
Female (Paratype IBSP 62402). Total length 2.4, carapace width 0.93; leg I: 10.4 (1.4 + 0.4 + 3.1 + 4.4 + 1.1), tibia II: 2.0, tibia III: 1.6, tibia IV: 2.6, tibia I L/d: 28. Habitus as in fig. 1. In general very similar to male. Epigynum dark brown, elevated, ventral region bulging, with rounded and shallow medium-sized median pocket, without apophyses or humps ( Figs. 11–13 View FIGURES 1–14 ), with two pairs of short and strong hairs on membranous area behind gonopore ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 1–14 ). Internal genitalia with two pore plates, longer than wide ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 1–14 ).
Variation. Three males: carapace width 0.9–1.0; tibia I: 4.2–5.2. Two females: carapace width 0.93; tibia I: 3.1–3.3.
Other material examined. Brazil, São Paulo : São Paulo ( Parque Estadual da Cantareira , 23° 25’ S; 46° 37’ W), 1♂, 14–19.XI.2004 ( IBSP 62405 View Materials ); 1♂, 12–17.V.2005 ( IBSP 62406 View Materials ) GoogleMaps .
Distribution. Known only from type locality.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |