Enoclerus chamelae Rifkind
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.213050 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6168340 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1E4A8038-FF8C-FFB3-FF77-FBA24A1E4688 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Enoclerus chamelae Rifkind |
status |
sp. nov. |
Enoclerus chamelae Rifkind , n. sp.
( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 1 – 9 )
Type specimens. Holotype male: México, Jalisco, Chamela, 5–vii–1985, R. Ayala, coll., Croton . Holotype deposited in CNIN. Paratypes: MEXICO, Jalisco: 1, Estación de Biología Chamela, 29–vii–1986, Alicia Rodriguez P., coll.; 1, same data as previous except Felipe A. Noguera M., coll.; 1, same data as previous except 17–vii–1986; 1, same data as previous except 17–vii–1989, S. Guzman, coll.; 1, same data as previous except 8–viii–1986, M. Sanchez, coll.; 2, same data as previous except vii–8 /16–1985, J. Chemsak, H. Katsura, A. & E. Michelbacher, collectors; 1, same data as previous except 15–23 July, 1987, F. T. Hovore, coll.; 1, same data as previous except August 10, 1982, 200', O'Brien, Wibmer, colls.; 1, Chamela, 7–ix–1985, R. Ayala, coll.; 1, same data as previous except 9–vii–1986, F. A. Noguera, coll.; 1, Melaque–Pto. Vallarta Rd., Km 48, 19 –7–1990, leg. A. Vogier. Paratypes are deposited in CNIN, EMEC, WFBM, and JNRC.
Diagnosis. The new species is distinguishable from congeners based on a unique combination of elytral sculpturing, coloration and vestiture, and pronotal setal patterning. Though it is strikingly similar to E. leehermani Ekis , a species from Chiapas and Oaxaca, their broad geographical separation makes distinguishing them simple in practice. Subtle but consistent differences between the two species are threefold: 1) The posterior pronotal band of vestiture (rusty in E. chamelae ; usually white in E. leehermani ) is transverse anteriorly on the disk in E. leehermani , but produced triangularly anteriorly in E. chamelae ; 2) In E. chamelae , antennomeres 9 and 10 are inconspicuously clothed with very fine, pale setae, whereas in E. leehermani , they are vested with robust white setae; 3) In E. chamelae , the elytral apices appear black (black integument set with black setae), while in E. leehermani they are thinly covered with ashy pubescence.
Description (Holotype). Length: 9.40 mm. Color: black; apex of maxillary palpi, antennal scape (in part), antennomeres 9–11, and tarsi, brown to reddish–brown; pronotum narrowly orange at middle of anterior margin; elytra with a broad median orange fascia, anterior margin subsinuate on either side and somewhat constricted at suture, complete to lateral margins and internally, slightly arcuately emarginate on other side posteriorly ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 1 – 9 ). Head: antennae robust; antennomeres 9–11 forming a distinct club; eyes large; surface densely but shallowly and finely granulate–punctate, rather densely set with relatively long, suberect and erect setae, these arrayed in a whorled pattern, pale orange on frons, deepening to orange, and more thickly arrayed, posteriorly. Pronotum: about as broad as long, narrower than elytra at base; anterior margin slightly arcuate; sides rounded; collar not particularly broad; transverse impression rather shallow, broadly U–shaped at middle; posterior slope precipitous; surface rather finely, densely granulate–punctate, and irregularly, transversely rugulose; anterior 1/4 densely set with moderately long, suberect and erect, anteriorly oriented orange setae; middle with a broad transverse band of somewhat less densely arranged robust, suberect and erect black setae of various lengths; posterior 1/4 with a dense triangulate band of erect and suberect orange setae; sides more sparsely clothed with long, erect, white setae. Elytra: ratio of length to width 17:10, widest at about middle, rather deep in cross section; humeri rounded; sides slightly inflexed before anterior 1/3, then slightly expanded to middle, posterior to which they very gradually, arcuately converge to separately rounded, dehiscent apices; subbasal tumescences shallow, rounded above; disk subflattened above; apical slope moderate; surface of anterior 3/4 moderately coarsely, moderately densely and deeply punctate; integument at orange median fascia also bearing scattered dark, deep, fine punctures; posterior 1/4 very finely granulate–rugulose, without punctures above; anterior dorsum with an inverted triangulate band of mostly reclinate, rather robust white setae, extending from anterior margin well posterior to scutellum, followed posteriorly by a dense but inconspicuous band of erect and suberect black setae of various lengths; middle orange band densely but inconspicuously clothed with fine suberect (and fewer longer, erect and more robust) orange setae, bordered posteriorly by a transverse, hourglass–shaped fascia of black vestiture (composed as on subbasal black band); posterior 1/7 clothed with a triangulate fascia of reclinate, rather densely set, ashy pubescence, incomplete at apices, which are darkly setose. Mesosternum: surface densely covered with long silvery setae; posterior median process only slightly elevated. Metasternum: densely, finely rugulose, vested as on mesosternum; anterior median process sulcate, not elevated at apex. Abdomen: coarsely, shallowly punctate–granulate, rather sparsely clothed with silvery setae; visible sternite 5 shallowly, arcuately emarginate posteriorly; visible sternite 6 short, subtruncate at apex; visible sternite 6 slightly emarginate at middle of posterior margin; setal daggers absent. Legs: robust.
Variation. Size ranges from 7.75 mm to 11.50 mm. The shape and width of the median elytral fascia are somewhat variable, and it is paler in a couple of examples.
Etymology. The specific epithet refers to Chamela, Jalisco, México, the type locality of the species.
Natural history. This is apparently a diurnal species whose flight period corresponds with the summer rainy season in coastal Jalisco. One specimen was taken on Croton (Euphorbiaciae) . Vegetation at Chamela is primarily tropical deciduous forest and tropical semideciduous forest ( Lott 1993).
Distribution. Pacific coastal Mexico in the vicinity of Chamela Bay, Jalisco.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |