Otomys jacksoni, Thomas, 1891
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.6887260 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6868610 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1E30E275-34A8-FF19-E467-2E5D72F08B1E |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Otomys jacksoni |
status |
|
392. View On
Mount Elgon Vlei Rat
French: Otomys de Jackson / German: Mount-Elgon-Lamellenzahnratte / Spanish: Rata de laguna de Elgon
Taxonomy. Otomys jacksoni Thomas, 1891 View in CoL ,
“Mount Elgon, 13200 ft [= 4023 m],” Uganda.
Although previously included in O. typus , O. jackson: differs from it in body size, number of M® lamina, and genetically. Monotypic. Distribution. Known only from Mt Elgon, E Uganda and W Kenya. Descriptive notes. Head-body 120-171 mm, tail 57-82 mm, ear 19-26 mm, hindfoot 19-26 mm; weight 70-121 g. The Mount Elgon Vlei Rat is medium to large in size and robust, with large blunt head,shorttail, and shaggy fur; it is the smallest of the O. typus species group. Fur coloris not clearly distinct from the Ethiopian Vlei Rat ( O. typus ). Lower incisors each have two deep grooves. M, has four laminae, and M? has seven laminae. View Figure
Habitat. Dense grasslands in alpine zone at elevations of 3300-4200 m. The Mount Elgon Vlei Rat avoids wet swampy areas occupied by co-occurring Barbour’s Vlei Rats (O. barbounri). Food and Feeding. Dominant food items of the Mount Elgon Vlei Rat are grasses such as Festuca pilgeri, Koeleria capensis , and Argostis gracilifolia (all Poaceae ) and flowers of Helichrysum (Asteraceae) . Breeding. Breeding of the Mount Elgon Vlei Rat is continuous, and reproductive individuals and juveniles can be found year-round. Activity patterns. The Mount Elgon Vlei Rat is presumably diurnal or crepuscular. Movements, Home range and Social organization. Mount Elgon Vlei Rats do not make nests. Home ranges overlap considerably and are 401-728 m® for males and 181-481 m” for females. Status and Conservation. Not assessed on The IUCN Red List. The Mount Elgon Vlei Rat has a restricted distribution and known negative anthropogenic impacts include uncontrolled fires resulting in habitat loss. Both conditions might justify classification as Endangered. Bibliography. Clausnitzer (2003), Monadjem et al. (2015), Taylor, Lavrenchenko et al. (2011), Taylor, Maree et al. (2014).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.