Maechidius pauxillus Heller, 1910
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.721.1127 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:89E62EF8-2E45-4C59-94B7-6A5603E8939B |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4344429 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1A3787F6-9D40-9205-FD95-FE0FCD652B7B |
|
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
|
scientific name |
Maechidius pauxillus Heller, 1910 |
| status |
|
Maechidius pauxillus Heller, 1910 View in CoL comb. rest.
Figs 71 View Figs 70–73 , 160–161 View Figs 157–168 , 243 View Figs 242–258 , 275 View Figs 266–277 , 333 View Figs 333–348 , 406, 505–506, 685–687
Type material
Lectotype [herewith designated]
PAPUA NEW GUINEA • ♂; “ K.Wilhelm Land, Bongu [p, blue label] // [upper side of label] typus [p] [underside of label] pauxillus Heller [h] [red label]// Staatl. Museum für Tierkunde.Dresden [p]”; SNSD.
New material
PAPUA NEW GUINEA • 14 specs; “Stn. No. 46.// NEW GUINEA: Madang Dist. , Finisterre Mts. Damanti 3,550 ft. 2-11.x.1964 // M.E. Bacchus. B.M. 1965-120.”; BMNH • 1 spec.; “Stn. No. 51. // NEW GUINEA: Madang Dist. , Finisterre Mts. Budemu c. 4000 ft. 15-24.x.1964 // M.E. Bacchus. B.M. 1965- 120. // Paramaechidius pauxillus det. G.Frey, 1967/68”; BMNH .
Remarks
Heller (1910: 24) likely based his description of M. pauxillus on a single specimen – although not explicitly stated. The single SNSD specimen labelled “typus” is herewith designated as lectotype in order to enhance the stability of nomenclature and fix the specimen I based my redescription on, in case other syntypes are discovered in the future.
Description
MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 5.20–5.65 (lectotype) to 6.10 mm.
Dorsum and venter uniformly brown. Dorsum almost completely covered with microscopical velvety pubescence. Head humped dorsally between eyes, opaque dorsally and ventrally. Male labroclypeus ( Fig. 160 View Figs 157–168 ) broadly emarginate anteriorly, its lateral margins sinuous in both dorsal and lateral views. Anterolateral angles acute, strongly protruding, raised up at angle of nearly 90–95° to frons in lateral view. Female labroclypeus less deeply emarginate on anterior margin ( Fig. 161 View Figs 157–168 ). Anterior and lateral margins of labroclypeus smooth. Underside of labroclypeus with sparse long setae along anterior and lateral margins. Canthus straight in dorsal view. Dorsal sculpture of head almost completely obscured by dense suberect strongly clavate scales. Punctures of frons ovoid, deep and dense. Setae scale-like, dense, more or less strongly clavate, suberect to erect. Male antenna 9-segmented, club 3-lamellate. Pronotum transverse, opaque dorsally and laterally. Anterior margin of pronotum sinuous with median part (slightly) and anterolateral angles (stronger) protruding, basal margin broadly slightly sinuous. Lateral margin of pronotum sinuous, nearly straight in anterior two thirds, constricted afterwards towards base, delicately (indistinctly) crenulate all along ( Fig. 243 View Figs 242–258 ). Clavate short seta present between every two crenulae. Lateral margin of pronotum straight in anterior two thirds, curved in basal third in lateral view. Hypomeron hardly emarginate and long setose on anterior margin which is flange-like ( Fig. 275 View Figs 266–277 ). Antennal pocket deep. Pronotal punctures deeper than those on head, irregularly ovoid. Median ones provided with minute seta at anterior margin not surpassing midlength of corresponding puncture. Lateral and anterior margins very densely scale-like clavate setose. Scutellar shield narrowly rounded apically. Elytron opaque, with vague tracks of two longitudinal carinae plus broadly interrupted glabrous remnants of sutural one. Punctures of elytral disc irregular, ovoid, deep, intervening spaces irregularly large ( Fig. 333 View Figs 333–348 ). Majority of elytral setae minute, not surpassing midlength of corresponding puncture. Numerous large scale-like clavate setae arranged in several irregular longitudinal rows. Obtuse partially glossy hump near apex. Male pygidium covered with microscopical velvety pubescence, slightly impressed dorsally in anterior part, transversely humped medially, flattened otherwise ( Fig. 505 View Figs 504–521 ). Punctures of pygidium rather deep and dense, circular to ovoid, intervening spaces (when exposed from under velvety pubescence) glossy. Setae of pygidium scale-like, mostly not surpassing length of corresponding punctures, with several much larger clavate erect scales in central part. All scales pointing obliquely to middle. Female pygidium with generally larger scale-like setae than male ( Fig. 506 View Figs 504–521 ). Male pygidium sometimes with transverse row of scale-like setae, is/ is not interrupted medially. Protibia narrow, delicately crenulate along external margin. Distal teeth virtually not present: remnants of two inconspicuous ones can be tracked (Fig. 406). Male protibial terminal spur curved. Male metatibial terminal spurs strongly unequal, the curved lower one about twice as long as straight upper one. Male tarsal claws with pulvilli. Aedeagus as in Figs 685–687 View Figs 682–696 .
Sexual dimorphism
Female claws without pulvilli. Apex of female elytron without conspicuous protrusion. Female pygidium generally flat (not transversely humped), with a transverse row of dense scale-like elongate setae.
| SNSD |
SNSD |
| BMNH |
United Kingdom, London, The Natural History Museum [formerly British Museum (Natural History)] |
| NEW |
University of Newcastle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.