Cenemus culiculus (Simon, 1898)

Huber, Bernhard A. & Meng, Guanliang, 2023, On the mysterious Seychellois endemic spider genus Cenemus (Araneae, Pholcidae), Arthropod Systematics & amp; Phylogeny 81, pp. 179-200 : 179

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/asp.81.e86793

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:17BF9111-5551-410B-9703-0B0F3AAE867E

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/11D139E2-E332-5079-B9ED-58DE7414B1EA

treatment provided by

Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny by Pensoft

scientific name

Cenemus culiculus (Simon, 1898)
status

 

3.2.2. Cenemus culiculus (Simon, 1898) View in CoL

Figs 5-11 View Figures 5–11 , 12-17 View Figures 12–17 , 18-20 View Figures 18–20 , 21-23 View Figures 21–23 , 24-28 View Figures 24–28 , 29-37 View Figures 29–37 , 38-46 View Figures 38–46 , 47-54 View Figures 47–54 , 55-63 View Figures 55–63

Holocnemus culiculus Simon, 1898: 375 (juv.); Saaristo 1978: 103, figs 27-30, 39-45 (♂♀).

Cenemus culiculus (Simon, 1898); Saaristo 2001: 19, figs 36-41, 47-48; Saaristo 2010: 160, figs 25.6-15 (text and figures copied from previous papers, with errors, e.g. regarding material of C. mikehilli listed under C. culiculus ).

Diagnosis.

See Saaristo (2001, 2002) for morphological differences between the three nominal species. Interspecific relationships are beyond the scope of this study.

Type.

SEYCHELLES - Mahé • 1 juvenile holotype, examined; precise locality not identified; 1895; A. Brauer leg; MNHN 10343, with E. Simon’s handwritten label "15220 Hol. culicinus [sic!] ES, Ins. Sechelles (Brauer)" .

Material examined.

SEYCHELLES - Mahé • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Anse Boileau, Glacis La Reserve ; 4.7070°S, 55.5007°E; 230 m a.s.l.; 7 Mar. 2013; C. Hoareau leg.; ZFMK Ar 23864 GoogleMaps 1 ♂ in pure ethanol; same data as preceding; ZFMK Sey 25 GoogleMaps 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; Bel Ombre, "site 2"; 4.6215°S, 55.3914°E; 80 m a.s.l.; 6 Mar. 2013; C. Hoareau leg.; ZFMK Ar 23865 GoogleMaps 1 ♀ in pure ethanol; same data as preceding; ZFMK Sey 28 GoogleMaps 7 ♂♂, 6 ♀♀; Bel Ombre, "site 1"; 4.6215°S, 55.3957°E; 70 m a.s.l.; 6 Mar. 2013; C. Hoareau leg.; ZFMK Ar 23866 GoogleMaps 2 ♀♀, 1 juv., in pure ethanol; same data as preceding; ZFMK Sey 24 GoogleMaps 1 ♂, 3 ♀♀; Port Glaud, Casse Dent ; 4.648°S, 55.428°E; 450 m a.s.l.; 8 Mar. 2013; C. Hoareau leg.; ZFMK Ar 23867 GoogleMaps 1 ♀ in pure ethanol; same data as preceding; ZFMK Sey 27 GoogleMaps 7 ♂♂, 8 ♀♀; Port Glaud, Morne Blanc ; 4.6559°S, 55.4388°E; 430 m a.s.l.; 4 Mar. 2013; C. Hoareau leg.; ZFMK Ar 23868 to 23869 GoogleMaps 2 ♀♀, 4 juvs, in pure ethanol; same data as preceding; ZFMK Sey 22 GoogleMaps 1 ♀; Port Glaud, near Cap Ternay ; 4.6452°S, 55.3883°E; 40 m a.s.l.; 4 Mar. 2013; C. Hoareau leg.; ZFMK Ar 23870 GoogleMaps . - Silhouette • 1 ♂, 1 ♀, see Remarks below; Jardin Marron ; 4.48°S, 55.24°E; 20 Jan. 1999; M. Saaristo and J. Gerlach leg.; MZT (without number; presumably taken from MZT AA 1108 to 1110) GoogleMaps .

Redescription.

Male (ZFMK Ar 23866) - MEASUREMENTS. Total length 6.5, carapace width 2.2. Distance PME-PME 100 µm; diameter PME 160 µm; distance PME-ALE 100 µm; diameter AME 110 µm; distance AME-AME 30 µm. Leg 1: 59.4 (14.7 + 0.9 + 14.5 + 25.7 + 3.6), tibia 2: 8.7, tibia 3: 6.2, tibia 4: 7.3; tibia 1 L/d: 55; femora 1-4 diameters at half length: 0.40, 0.31, 0.30, 0.30. - COLOR (in ethanol). Carapace pale ochre with median brown band including ocular area and pair of submarginal lateral bands (Fig. 5 View Figures 5–11 ); clypeus light brown; sternum dark brown, with lighter brown median mark, narrow lateral light bands, and dark brown lateral margins; legs brown, femora and tibiae with light tips and dark brown to black subdistal rings; abdomen ochre-gray, with dark marks dorsally and laterally, ventrally with large black marks in front of gonopore and at spinnerets, with lighter brown diffuse median band behind gonopore. - BODY. Habitus as in Fig. 5 View Figures 5–11 . Ocular area raised; each secondary eye with small accompanying elevation (Fig. 30 View Figures 29–37 ). Carapace with short but deep thoracic pit dividing posteriorly into pair of diverging shallow furrows extending toward posterior margin (Fig. 29 View Figures 29–37 ). Clypeus unmodified, only rim slightly more sclerotized than in female and median stripe with slightly different cuticle (as in female; cf. Fig. 48 View Figures 47–54 ). Sternum wider than long (1.4/0.9), unmodified. Abdomen cylindrical, dorso-posteriorly rounded. Gonopore with six epiandrous spigots (Fig. 31 View Figures 29–37 ; three males examined). ALS with one widened spigot and one pointed spigot (Fig. 32 View Figures 29–37 ); PME with two conical spigots (Fig. 32 View Figures 29–37 ). - CHELICERAE. As in Figs 12-13 View Figures 12–17 ; with pair of frontal lateral apophyses, each with one modified cone-shaped hair (Figs 33-34 View Figures 29–37 ); distance between tips of modified hairs: 0.74; without proximal protrusion; frontal face of chelicerae with numerous pores of unknown function (Fig. 35 View Figures 29–37 ); lateral stridulatory files distinct (Fig. 36 View Figures 29–37 ), ~70 ridges, distances between ridges proximally ~6 µm, distally ~4 µm. - PALPS. As is Figs 9-11 View Figures 5–11 ; coxa with rounded retrolateral hump, prolaterally with complex system of comb-shaped processes and long and short hair-like processes (Fig. 37 View Figures 29–37 ); trochanter barely modified; femur distally widened, with rounded ventral protrusion, dorsally straight, without proximal retrolateral process, with distinct retrolateral transversal line, with prolateral stridulatory pick proximally (Fig. 38 View Figures 38–46 ); femur-patella joints shifted toward prolateral side; patella triangular in lateral view, i.e. very short ventrally; tibia large compared to femur, tibia-tarsus joints shifted toward retrolateral side; tarsus without macrotrichia, with short dorsal process carrying capsulate tarsal organ (Fig. 39 View Figures 38–46 ); procursus (Figs 18-20 View Figures 18–20 ) straight, without ventral “knee”, with dense brush of hairs dorsally and laterally (Fig. 42 View Figures 38–46 ), proximally without prolateral hump but with ridge, procursus tip with bifid dorsal sclerite, prolateral tip short and sclerotized, retrolateral tip longer and semitransparent (Fig. 19 View Figures 18–20 ), procursus tip retrolaterally with small projections around pit with four hair-shaped processes (Fig. 40 View Figures 38–46 ), ventrally without (or with strongly reduced?) ventral spine; genital bulb (Figs 14-17 View Figures 12–17 ) with ventral hump, simple basal sclerite connected to distal (main) sclerite; distal sclerite with two distinctive processes: short rounded retrolateral process and longer prolateral process bent at right angle (Figs 43-44 View Figures 38–46 ), with two transparent processes originating from basis of prolateral process, possibly extensible and with complex tip (Figs 45-46 View Figures 38–46 ); sperm duct opening at basis of long prolateral process (arrows in Figs 43-44 View Figures 38–46 ). - LEGS. Without spines; without curved hairs; few vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium of tibia 1 at 2%; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1, present on other tibiae; tarsus 1 with ~35 distinct pseudosegments (cf. female, Fig. 56 View Figures 55–63 ); tarsal organs capsulate, distinctively oval, with indentation medially on proximal part of rim (cf. female, Figs 58-61 View Figures 55–63 ).

Variation. Males. Total body length ~4.0-6.5; tibia 1 in 15 males from Mahé: 10.1-14.5 (mean 12.8); distance between tips of cheliceral apophyses: 0.67-0.76 (N = 14). Sternum sometimes without lateral dark margins; abdomen sometimes also with whitish marks; small males with cheliceral apophyses directed more towards lateral, at up to 40° against vertical line versus 25-30° in large males (i.e., maintaining a similar absolute distance between the tips).

Female.

In general similar to male (Figs 6-7 View Figures 5–11 ); ventral abdominal band usually darker and wider than in males (Fig. 21 View Figures 21–23 ), often divided by light lines into two or three longitudinal bands; cheliceral stridulatory files (Fig. 49 View Figures 47–54 ) smaller than in males (~40 ridges), distances between ridges proximally ~6 µm, distally ~4.5 µm. Without stridulatory apparatus between carapace and abdomen. Tibia 1 in 20 females from Mahé: 9.2-14.7 (mean 12.6); body length: ~3.5-6.5. Epigynum as in Figs 22-23 View Figures 21–23 and 51-52 View Figures 47–54 ; main epigynal plate trapezoidal, weakly protruding, only posteriorly laterally with pair of distinctive flat processes, each with small but deep pocket at posterior extreme (arrows in Fig. 52 View Figures 47–54 ), distances between pockets: 0.60-0.80 (mean 0.70) (N = 17); with pair of large pits more anteriorly on main epigynal plate, provided with numerous pores (Fig. 53 View Figures 47–54 ), distance between pits: 0.27-0.42 (mean 0.34) (N = 17); distinct plate in front of epigynum with large dark median pit with smooth cuticle and without pores; posterior epigynal plate short and simple (Fig. 22 View Figures 21–23 ). Internal genitalia (Figs 24-28 View Figures 24–28 ) with large oval pore plates converging anteriorly, separated by V-shaped sclerite; dorsal arc with median posterior sclerotized process, ventral arc simple, without ventral median pocket (Fig. 26 View Figures 24–28 ). Spigots as in male (Figs 62-63 View Figures 55–63 ).

Remarks.

The Zoological Museum in Hamburg, Germany, has a further juvenile specimen labeled as holotype (ZMH-A0002275). This specimen seems to originate from the same place and the same collecting event, is very probably conspecific with the MNHN specimen, and it also fits Simon’s (1898) original description. Simon (1898) did not indicate whether one or two specimens were available to him. We assume that he did not examine the Hamburg specimen, and that it is thus not a type specimen. First, there is no label in Simon’s handwriting with the Hamburg specimen. Second, a label says "Seychellen, A. Brauer leg. 1895, Mus. Marburg, comm. 24. VII. 1901". The specimen might thus have come to Hamburg directly from Marburg rather than from E. Simon. Unfortunately, the communication from July 1901 is apparently lost (N. Dupérré, personal communication, 12 Nov. 2021).

The two specimens (male and female) examined from Silhouette are labeled as C. culiculus and originate from the same collecting event as the specimens from Jardin Marron listed in Saaristo (2001) (under C. culiculus ). The male is extremely similar to specimens from Mahé but has a smaller distance between the tips of the cheliceral apophyses: 0.61. The same is true of the female, which has a smaller distance between the pockets at the posterior epigynal margin: 0.55. In addition, the epigynum resembles Saaristo’s (2001) drawing of C. silhouette rather than his drawing of C. culiculus . However, the male bulbal processes appear indistinguishable from those of C. culiculus from Mahé. In addition, the specimens from Silhouette differ from those of Mahé by a lighter clypeus and a median carapace band that is narrower in the central part. The assignment of these specimens is thus tentative, and the separation of C. culiculus and C. silhouette clearly needs further study.

Natural history.

Adult specimens were mostly found in large sheltered spaces near the ground, between rocks and roots (arrow in Fig. 3 View Figures 3–4 ). Juveniles often occupied more exposed habitats, among the vegetation up to 2 m above the ground. The domed sheet webs of adults (Fig. 4 View Figures 3–4 ) had a diameter of ~20-40 cm. No silk balls were seen in the webs. When disturbed, the spiders tended to run towards the back, i.e. deeper into the shelter, rather than to vibrate or swing their bodies. However, they were often seen to bob or rotate their abdomens without any obvious disturbance. When caught, they were extremely quick at autotomizing one or more legs.

Distribution.

Apparently present on Mahé and Silhouette, but see Remarks above.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Pholcidae

Genus

Cenemus