Neofibularia nolitangere ( Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5031.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CC3A59D1-E09E-407E-93F4-4796FD3D7C19 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5495436 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/110587B3-4D18-4805-FF53-F91649CD33B8 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Neofibularia nolitangere ( Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864 ) |
status |
|
Neofibularia nolitangere ( Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864) View in CoL
Tables 6, 7; Figs. 13A–C View FIGURE 13 , 16M View FIGURE 16
Synonymy and references: Amphimedon nolitangere Duchassaing & Michelotti (1864: 82) ; Fibularia massa , Fibulia nolitangere , Fibulia massa , Gellius massa , Neofibularia massa and Neofibularia nolitangere nolitangere : see references compiled in Hartman (1967: 7); Neofibularia nolitangere, Hajdu & van Soest (2002: 648) and Pérez et al. (2017: 11).
Type locality. St. Thomas .
Material examined. CNPGG-2206, Cayo Arcas reef (20.20183°N, - 91.97583°W), 6.7 m depth, coll. Diana Ugalde, 20 August 2018 GoogleMaps .
Description. Massive habit, growing in laterally fused tubes, sometimes volcano-shaped with an apical depression ( Fig. 16M View FIGURE 16 ); the largest specimen measures up to 22 × 10 cm. Surface hispid, slightly rugose. Oscules are wide and oval-shaped up to 2 cm in diameter. Color in vivo dark red-brown and beige after fixation. The consistency is crumbly and brittle.
Skeleton. Irregular reticulation of fibers cored by several spicules projecting out the fibers; meshes 200 µm in diameter ( Figs. 13A–B View FIGURE 13 ).
Spicules. Megascleres: Strongyles slightly curved 270– 317.6 (27.48)–350/8– 10.8 (1.5)–12 µm ( Fig. 13C View FIGURE 13 ). Microscleres: straight microxeas 110– 116 (4.1)–120/8– 10.8 (1.5)–12 µm ( Fig. 13C View FIGURE 13 1 View FIGURE 1 ); raphides occurring singly 100– 107 (6.7)–115/2– 2.3 (0.5)–2.4 µm; sigmas 16– 17 (1.95)–20 µm ( Fig. 13C View FIGURE 13 2 View FIGURE 2 ).
Distribution. Mexico (current records), Bahamas, US (North Carolina, Florida) (de Laubenfels 1936), other countries in the Caribbean Sea ( Zea 1987).
Remarks. Hartman (1967) revised specimens of Neofibularia nolitangere where sigmas had been overlooked by de Laubenfels (1936), and found them. These specimens perfectly matched additional materials from the former author, and Hechtel (1965) before him, described from Jamaica, including the presence of dermatitis-producing toxins. Specimens described here possess all three categories of microscleres, although the similar lengths of raphides and microxea raises the possibility of the former being merely juveniles of the latter. Contrary to Hartman’s (1967) report, we could not see distinctly arranged trichodragmas for either category, much the less both.
Ours is the first record of this species in the SGoM. It was formerly known from the northern part of the GoM, in particular from Florida, as well as from the Caribbean (widely distributed) and the Bahamas.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |