Graomys edithae Thomas 1919
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7316535 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11326038 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0C81F7EB-1DAE-536F-1C2D-24DF99339ED8 |
treatment provided by |
Guido |
scientific name |
Graomys edithae Thomas 1919 |
status |
|
Graomys edithae Thomas 1919 View in CoL
Graomys edithae Thomas 1919 View in CoL , Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 9, 3: 495.
Type Locality: Argentina, Catamarca Prov., Otro Cerro, 3000 m.
Vernacular Names: Otro Cerro Pericote.
Distribution: Known only from the type locality.
Conservation: IUCN – Lower Risk (lc).
Discussion: Status uncertain—placed as a full synonym of griseoflavus medius (Cabrera, 1961) ; retained as a nominal species of Phyllotis ( Hershkovitz, 1962) or of Graomys ( Gyldenstolpe, 1932; Mares et al., 1997; Myers, 1977; Williams and Mares, 1978); or considered a nomen dubium ( Galliari et al., 1996). Thomas’ (1919) measurements certainly characterize G. edithae as a smaller form than cachinus and medius , taxa collected at lower elevations in the region of Otro Cerro and now regarded as examples of the larger G. griseoflavus . Reinvestigation of original type series, along with altitudinal transects across vegetation zones in the region, would shed much light. Using an old map (1893) of Catamarca Province, as cited by Cabrera (1961:487), Pardiñas (pers. com.) located the type locality Otro Cerro in the Sierra de Ambato, Capayán Dept., ca. 31.5 km W Huillapima and 16.5 km NNW Chumbicha; formal amendment should be effected in a revisionary context.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.