Typhlamphiascus Lang, 1944
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2021.759.1433 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4E28C54D-855A-478F-BB84-9576FFE8F24B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5104680 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0B3187C8-FFA5-894B-FDFD-3433FBBEAFAE |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Typhlamphiascus Lang, 1944 |
status |
|
Type species
Amphiascus typhlops Sars, 1906 , by original designation.
Other species and subspecies
T. blanchardi (T. Scott & A. Scott, 1895) (originally described in Stenhelia )
T. brevicornis (I.C. Thompson & A. Scott, 1903) (originally described in Stenhelia )
T. capensis Kunz, 1975 comb. nov.
T. confusus (T. Scott, 1902) (originally described in Stenhelia )
T. confusus erythraeicus Por, 1963
T. confusus gullmaricus Por, 1963
T. dentipes (I.C. Thompson & A. Scott, 1903) (originally described in Stenhelia )
T. gracilicaudatus (I.C. Thompson & A. Scott, 1903) (originally described in Stenhelia )
T. lamellifer ( Sars, 1911) (originally described in Amphiascus )
T. medici sp. nov.
Species incertae sedis
Stenhelia hirsuta Thompson, 1893
T. accraensis (T. Scott, 1894) (described in Stenhelia )
T. typhloides ( Sars, 1911) (described in Amphiascus )
Species inquirendae
T. typhlops (Sars, 1906) sensu Por (1963)
T. aff. confusus confusus (T. Scott, 1902) sensu Moore (1976)
T. confusus confusus (T. Scott, 1902) sensu Marinov & Apostolov (1985)
Typhlamphiascus sp. in Vilela 1965
Typhlamphiascus sp. ? in Bodin 1964
Typhlamphiascus sp. ? in Bodin 1964
Typhlamphiascus sp. I (? confusus ) in Marinov 1977
Typhlamphiascus sp. II in Marinov 1977
Emended diagnosis
Miraciidae : Diosaccinae . Body fusiform; length: width ratio of caudal rami from about 1.0 to about 3.0. Rostrum not fused to cephalothorax, triangular, elongate, as long as first and second antennulary segments combined, with pointed tip, with one subdistal sensilla on each side. Female genital and third urosomites distinct dorsally and/or laterally, completely fused ventrally forming genital double-somite; genital and third urosomites separated in males. Length:width ratio of caudal rami variable, from 1:1 to 3:1. Female antennule seven- to nine-segmented, with aesthetasc and seta fused basally on fourth segment, and with apical acrothek on last segment. Male antennule haplocer, eight–ten-segmented, with aesthetasc and seta fused basally on fifth segment, and with apical acrothek on last segment. Antennulary setae typically smooth, except for few slightly setulose setae on penultimate and last articles in females and males. Antenna with allobasis; exopod three-segmented, armature formula 1-0-1,3,0. Mandibular palp biramous; endopod one-segmented, larger than exopod; exopod two-segmented. Maxillule biramous; rami one-segmented. Maxilla with three endites; endopod two-segmented. Maxilliped subchelate; (syn)coxa with two to four, basis with two setae; endopod one-segmented, with claw and variable number of accompanying setae. P1–P4 with three-segmented rami. Male P1 basis sexually dimorphic, with normal or modified (elongate, blunt) inner spine, without or with variable number of inner accessory spines (two–eight). Male P2 sexually dimorphic, two-segmented; first segment with one inner seta, second segment with two inner setae, two subdistal elements (one of which thick and blunt) and two elements (one medial, one apical) issuing from elongate cylindrical extension fused to segment basally. P5 EXP typically longer than wide, with four to six setae in the female and male; P5 endopodal lobe with four to five setae in the female, with two setae in the male; two innermost elements of the female P5 endopodal lobe and armature of the male P5 endopodal lobe bifurcate distally.
Armature formula of P1–P5 as follows: View Table
Sexual dimorphism expressed in the male antennule (see above), P1 basis, P2 ENP (see above), P5 (see above), structure of P6, and in the separated genital and third urosomites.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Copepoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Diosaccinae |