Actinopus cordobensis Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.2.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5655657 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0975136A-FF3C-CEEC-FF77-FE36DEF63D62 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Actinopus cordobensis Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018 |
status |
|
Actinopus cordobensis Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018 View in CoL
Actinopus cordobensis Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018: 35 View in CoL View Cited Treatment , fig. 15 A–G, 45 (holotype ♂, [32º 42’ S 62º 6’ W], Campo Experimental INTA de Marcos Juárez, Córdoba, Argentina, ii–iii.2011, MACN-Ar 36613; not examined); World Spider Catalog, 2020.
Diagnosis. Males of A. cordobensis ( Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018, fig. 15 D–F) resemble those of A. itacolomi ( Fig. 153 View FIGURE 153 A–C), A. longipalpis ( Fig. 156 View FIGURE 156 A–C), A. ariasi ( Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018, fig. 12 D–F) and A. coylei ( Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018, fig. 16 D–F), by the PA continuous to PAc. They differ from those of A itacolomi , A. longipalpis and A. pindapoy ( Fig. 159 View FIGURE 159 A–C) by the wider bulb and from those of A. ariasi by the presence of a conspicuous serrated area on embolar base and, according to Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff (2018), from those of A. coylei by the legs with metatarsi and tarsi lighter ( Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018, fig. 15 B).
Description. See Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff (2018: 35).
Distribution. ARGENTINA: San Luis and Córdoba.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Actinopus cordobensis Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018
Miglio, Laura Tavares, Pérez-Miles, Fernando & Bonaldo, Alexandre B. 2020 |
Actinopus cordobensis Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018: 35
Rios-Tamayo, D. & Goloboff, P. A. 2018: 35 |