Actinopus patagonia Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.2.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5655637 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0975136A-FF14-CEC4-FF77-FC99DA3E3BB4 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Actinopus patagonia Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018 |
status |
|
Actinopus patagonia Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018 View in CoL
Actinopus patagonia Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018: 59 View in CoL View Cited Treatment , fig. 29 A–H, 30 A–E, 45 (holotype ♂, [38º 48’ S 62º 57’ W], Salina Las Barrancas, Buenos Aires, Argentina, iv.1960, MACN-Ar 27097; paratype ♀, [42º 28’ S 63º 37’ W], Caleta Valdés (Península de Valdés), Isla de los Guanacos, Buenos Aires, Argentina, xii.1981, P. Domíngues and P. Goloboff, MACN-Ar 27100; not examined); World Spider Catalog, 2020.
Diagnosis. Males of A. patagonia ( Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018, fig. 29 A–H) resembles A. osbournei ( Fig. 133 C View FIGURE 133 ), A. dioi ( Fig. 136 C View FIGURE 136 ) and all species of group goloboffi ( Ríos, 2014, figs 1–12; Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018, fig 38 A–G, 39 A–H, 40 A–D) by two basal and two proximal sigilla merged on the middle of portions basal and proximal of sternum. They differ from those of group goloboffi by absence of central depression on the middle of sternum. They resemble those of the two species of group goloboffi ( Fig. 135 View FIGURE 135 A–C, Fig. 138 View FIGURE 138 A–C) by the position of BTA on the tegulum and three keels in prolateral view of the tegulum. Differs from A. osbournei and A. dioi by wider embolus and PA developed; differs from A. dioi by elongated shape of the copulatory bulb. The females differs from A. gerschiapelliarum (Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018, fig. 19 C–D) by a smaller constriction below external lobes on each receptacle and by presence of pores on all the length of receptacles.
Description. See Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff (2018: 59).
Distribution. ARGENTINA: Buenos Aires. URUGUAY: Rocha.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Actinopus patagonia Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018
Miglio, Laura Tavares, Pérez-Miles, Fernando & Bonaldo, Alexandre B. 2020 |
Actinopus patagonia Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018: 59
Rios-Tamayo, D. & Goloboff, P. A. 2018: 59 |