Bryophila squamosa Schwingenschuss, 1936

Vargas-Rodríguez, Suraya M., Fibiger, Michael, Honey, Martin R., Ronkay, Gábor, Yela, José Luis, Zilli, Alberto & Ronkay, László, 2020, Bryophila perloides Guenée, 1852 (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Bryophilinae), an overlooked member of the European Noctuidae fauna, with upgrading of Bryopsis Boursin, 1970 to generic level (Taxonomic studies on the western Palaearctic Bryophilinae, No. 1), Zootaxa 4845 (1), pp. 53-70 : 61

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4845.1.4

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D851A396-2E5B-4FDA-8E06-D1C2D78B2C14

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4479808

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/072087D7-050E-FFB7-FF0B-69CFFBBF95E2

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Bryophila squamosa Schwingenschuss, 1936
status

 

Bryophila squamosa Schwingenschuss, 1936 View in CoL

( Figs 3a View FIGURE 3. 3 and 7a View FIGURE 7. 7 )

Material examined: Two syntypes, labelled „ H. Atlas, Maroc, Goundafa, 1200 m, 15.-30.VI.1933, Schwingenschuss”, one of them designated here as lectotype ( Fig 3a View FIGURE 3. 3 ). In NHMW .

Lectotype designation: male, “ H. Atlas, Maroc, Goundafa, 1200 m, 15.-30.VI.1933, Schwingenschuss”, “ Bryophila squamosa Schwingenschuss Type ♂ ”, slide No.: RL 12464m (coll. NHMW).

Taxonomic notes: The taxon was described by Schwingenschuss in Zerny (1936). Most probably, the descriptions of B. barbaria and B. squamosa were made in parallel, and both may refer to the same taxon. Thus, the statement of Boursin (1954) about their synonymy may be correct. Nevertheless, we have found some differences between their male genitalia: the uncus of B. squamosa ( Fig 7a View FIGURE 7. 7 ) is more slender in its distal half than that of B. barbaria ( Fig 6c View FIGURE 6. 6 ), the apical section of valva is also narrower and less dilated at its tip, and the vesica is remarkably broader, more discoidal. We refrain from establishing the synonymy formally until we are able to study a longer series of specimens, including females. It has to be noted that Schwingenschuss itself remarked that “ Bryophila squamosa mihi is after Βοursin also just a barbaria . Since the design matches that of barbaria , but the wing-cut is different -especially in the female-, as well as the general impression, I consider it a subspecies, especially since the animals were found at 1200 m high in a hot basin in mid-June, while barbaria was found at 2200-2700 m in July.”

External diagnosis: see under B. barbaria . The lectotype shows a much more blurred condition than most of the examined specimens of B. barbaria ; it is thus probably an older specimen.

Genital diagnosis ( Fig. 7a View FIGURE 7. 7 ): see under B. barbaria and here, under Taxonomic notes.

NHMW

Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Lepidoptera

Family

Noctuidae

Genus

Bryophila

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF