Eugenia neogracilis Mazine & Sobral, 2010
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.8.1.6 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4968226 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0645AF50-5C7D-EE76-FF3C-3885FD11FE5E |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Eugenia neogracilis Mazine & Sobral |
| status |
nom. nov. |
3.9. Eugenia neogracilis Mazine & Sobral , nom. nov.
Eugenia gracilis O.Berg , Linnaea 27: 149. 1856 (name); Fl. Bras. 14(1): 222. 1857 (type: São Paulo, Sellow s.n., B, probably destroyed. Neotype here designated: Brasil, Espírito Santo, mun. Santa Teresa, Pedra da Onça , V. Demuner 500, MBML), not Eugenia gracilis Bedd., Madras J. Lit. Sci. 3(1): 46. 1854.
Although originally collected in the Brazilian state of São Paulo, we do not have any information of additional collections there; nevertheless, this species has been frequently collected in montane regions of the southeastern Brazilian state of Espírito Santo. Among recent collections in MBML (for a list of them check E. gracilis in CRIA 2010), Demuner 500 bears abundant flowers and adequately matches the protologue of E. gracilis ; herein we propose it as the neotype.
| V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Eugenia neogracilis Mazine & Sobral
| Sobral, M., Souza, M. C., Mazine-Capelo, F. & Lucas, E. 2010 |
Eugenia gracilis O.Berg
| O. Berg 1857: 222 |
| O. Berg 1856: 149 |