Melitaea (Mellicta) aurelia centralasiae Wnukowsky, 1929
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.33910/2686-9519-2023-15-2-325-354 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:912125ED-10E5-4A6C-86E7-548CCD69F364 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/05368791-C525-FFB7-2AEF-F9C2FB6DEE67 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Melitaea (Mellicta) aurelia centralasiae Wnukowsky, 1929 |
status |
|
Melitaea (Mellicta) aurelia centralasiae Wnukowsky, 1929 View in CoL
Specimens of Mellitaea ( Mellicta ) sp.: 1\NNE Parnaya, 3♂, 2♀; 2\NE Kopyovo, 7♂, 3♀; 3\ NNE Kopyovo, 1♂, 1♀; 4\WNW Shira, 1♂; 6\SE Efremkino, 4♂; 9\Terensug headwaters, 1♂; 10\Terensug, 1♂, 1♀; 12\Dzhabash, 1♂.
Visual registrations: 7\Sonskiy, few.
Remarks: Unfortunately, the collected specimens of the subgenus Mellicta Billberg, 1820
were not identified by the genitalia soon after capture and are unavai-lable at present. No doubt, most of them belonged to M. aurelia centralasiae (this taxonomical treatment follows Ivonin et al. 2013), which is most common species in the mea-dow steppe of the mountains of South Siberia, which is the ecological optimum of this taxon. Also most of the butterflies observed in the field had uneven colour of the UPS pale spots and somewhat expanded spots of the postdiscal rows, as usual in this taxon. However, it cannot be excluded that the collected series also contained two other expectable and quite common species, M. (Mellicta) athalia (Rottemburg, 1775) and/or M. (Mellicta) britomartis (Assmann, 1847) , so above I enumerate specimens as not identified to species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.