Victoriocambala Verhoeff, 1944
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.24199/j.mmv.2017.76.02 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8065160 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FF5B77-FFCE-FFDF-98D9-FD69FC181E15 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Victoriocambala Verhoeff, 1944 |
status |
|
Victoriocambala Verhoeff, 1944 View in CoL
Zoobank LSID. http://zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:
330CE9AA-124D-47EF-BCCC-6B60BE370A96
Victoriocambala Verhoeff, 1944: 35 View in CoL , 41; Jeekel, 1971: 115; Hoffman, 1980: 91; Jeekel, 1981: 40; Jeekel, 1985: 106, fig 4; Mauriès, 1987: 196, 198; Korsós & Johns, 2009: 3; Jeekel, 2009: 35; Edward & Harvey, 2010: 5; Korsós & Read, 2012: 46.
Type species. Victoriocambala buffalensis Verhoeff, 1944 , by monotypy.
Remarks. Verhoeff (1944, p. 41) noted that his new, monotypic Victoriocambala was most closely related to Amastigogonus Brölemann, 1913 , a then-monotypic Tasmanian genus to which he added two new Tasmanian species. By the time Jeekel (2009) described a second Victorian Victoriocambala species, the number of Tasmanian Amastigogonus species had increased to four ( Hoffman 1972; Mauriès et al .. 2001), and I have since added another six Tasmanian species ( Mesibov, 2017). Consistent and taxonomically useful differences between species in the two genera are listed in Table 1 View Table 1 .
The two Victoriocambala species share several characters with the Tasmanian endemic Equestrigonus tasmaniensis Mesibov, 2017 . In all three cases, there is an apical fringe of long setae on the anterior gonopod telopodite, the leg 7 coxa is not elongated, there is a prominent tab anteriorly on the leg 1 prefemur and the leg 2 coxa, and prefemoral tabs begin on ring 5. E. tasmaniensis differs from the Victoriocambala species in diplosegment sculpture (suture weakly defined, longitudinal metazonite striae curving upwards towards suture), having a prominent setal crown on the posterior gonopod and the coxite process on the anterior gonopod directed posterodistally rather than parallelling the telopodite and protecting the pseudoflagellum ( Mesibov, 2017). It seems likely that in a three-taxon molecular phylogeny, Equestrigonus and Victoriocambala would be more closely related than either is to Amastigogonus .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Victoriocambala Verhoeff, 1944
MESIBOV, ROBERT 2017 |
Victoriocambala
Korsos, Z. & Read, H. J. 2012: 46 |
Edward, K. L. & Harvey, M. S. 2010: 5 |
Korsos, Z. & Johns, P. M. 2009: 3 |
Jeekel, C. A. W. 2009: 35 |
Mauries, J. - P. 1987: 196 |
Jeekel, C. A. W. 1985: 106 |
Jeekel, C. A. W. 1981: 40 |
Hoffman, R. L. 1980: 91 |
Jeekel, C. A. W. 1971: 115 |
Verhoeff, K. W. 1944: 35 |