Circaea alpina L. subsp. imaicola ( Ascherson & Magnus 1870: 749 ) Kitamura (1960: 279)
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.597.4.1 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7963937 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FD5F66-FFE1-E157-3DCD-BC05FDA248EC |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Circaea alpina L. subsp. imaicola ( Ascherson & Magnus 1870: 749 ) Kitamura (1960: 279) |
| status |
|
2.1a. Circaea alpina L. subsp. imaicola ( Ascherson & Magnus 1870: 749) Kitamura (1960: 279) View in CoL
( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ).
≡ Circaea alpina L. var. imaicola Asch. & Magnus. View in CoL ≡ Circaea imaicola (Asch. & Magnus) Handel-Mazzetti (1933: 603) View in CoL .
Lectotype (designated by Boufford 1982):— INDIA. Eastern peninsula, Wight 989 ( K000742287 !, isolectotypes S-G-1389 digital image, L0008645 digital image) .
Distribution: —U Ganga & Indus, U Yarlung Zangbo, M Yarlung Zangbo, L Yarlung Zangbo, Yarlung Zangbo-Brahmaputra, C Nepal, E Nepal, W Nepal, Tangut, S Hengduan, N Hengduan.
Note: —It’s the most common subspecies in the Pan-Himalaya region. It can be distinguished by the flowers being held on erect or ascending pedicels.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Circaea alpina L. subsp. imaicola ( Ascherson & Magnus 1870: 749 ) Kitamura (1960: 279)
| Luo, Yike & Xie, Lei 2023 |
Circaea imaicola (Asch. & Magnus)
| Handel-Mazzetti 1933: 603 |
Circaea alpina L. var. imaicola
| Asch. & Magnus. 1753 |