Aegopsis bolboceridus ( Thomson, 1860 )

Sobral, Rafael, Grossi, Paschoal C. & De Morais, José W., 2018, Two new species of Aegopsis Burmeister, 1847 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Dynastinae) from the central Brazilian Cerrado, Zootaxa 4526 (2), pp. 175-194 : 177-183

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4526.2.4

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:541D8D11-DCC0-4E5C-8B23-81D92D0F1BE9

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5976891

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FC87E9-FF86-0630-FF4C-C8D7FE6BC31E

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Aegopsis bolboceridus ( Thomson, 1860 )
status

 

Aegopsis bolboceridus ( Thomson, 1860) View in CoL

( Figs. 1–8 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 , 11 View FIGURE 11 )

Agacephala bolbocerida: Thomson 1860: 19 ; Endrödi 1970: 52; Endrödi 1985: 213.

Brachysiderus bolbocerida: Prell 1934: 58 ; Blackwelder 1944: 260.

Aegopsis bolboceridus: Dechambre & Grossi 1990: 239 View in CoL ; Lachaume 1992: 28; Dechambre 1999: 174; Oliveira et al. 2008: 324; Oliveira & Frizzas 2013: 1; Neita-Moreno et al. 2014: 114.

Diagnosis. Males: clypeus subrectangular, apex emarginate ( Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ); internal lobe of mandibles apically protruding, mesal brush covering internal lobe laterally ( Fig. 5A View FIGURE 5 ); mandibles with apical protuberance near external carina ( Fig. 5A View FIGURE 5 ); mentum subrectangular, carina on mentum absent ( Fig. 5D View FIGURE 5 ); labrum concave at middle ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 ); parameres, in lateral view, thinner than apex of phallobase, lateral carina slightly curved basally ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ). Females: clypeus round, punctures shallow and annular on vertex ( Fig. 7A View FIGURE 7 ); distance from canthi carina to canthi apex almost equal to canthi thickness ( Fig. 3B View FIGURE 3 ); sensorial area of maxillary palpus striate ( Fig. 4C View FIGURE 4 ).

Male redescription. Color: Surface lustrous; dorsum, venter, and appendages brown with weak metallic shine ( Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 ). Head: Frons moderately punctate; punctures moderate and small, mixed. Cephalic horns moderately punctate, weakly rugopunctate dorsally on outer side; punctures sparse and small. Clypeus moderately punctate, punctures coalescent basally, becoming sparser and smaller to apex; shape subrectangular, apex truncate ( Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ); clypeus strongly concave from frontoclypeal suture to apex. Ocular canthi straight anteriorly, posteriorly projecting, tip round; anterior canthi carina sinuous, apex inconspicuous near external edge of canthi ( Fig. 3A View FIGURE 3 ). Mouthparts: Labrum setose, concave at middle, sides round ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 ). Mandibles subtriangular with two prominent teeth apically and two ventral carinae; in ventral view, apical protuberance near external carina, internal lobe apically protruding, mesal brush covering internal lobe laterally ( Fig. 5A View FIGURE 5 ). Maxilla with galea subtriangular, teeth absent; maxillary palpomere IV 3.6 times longer than wide; sensorial area densely striated ( Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 ). Mentum subrectangular, sides strongly convex, carina absent ( Fig. 5D View FIGURE 5 ). Prothorax: Pronotum bordered, disc weakly convex and distinctly punctate. Thoracic horn strong, apex slightly downturned. Puncture size almost uniform on disc, becoming smaller towards thoracic horn apex and denser on sides ( Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 ). Anterior angles and lateral edges of horn completely wrinkled. Scutellum: Subtriangular in shape, apex weakly projected; punctures large and dense medially and apically, small basally. Elytra: Form 1.7 times longer than wide. Surface glabrous, densely covered by large ocellate punctures and fine annular punctures, microsculpture slightly wrinkled. Elytral punctures generally irregular, with distinct sutural striae; striae not impressed, punctures small. Humeral umbone weak, apical umbone distinct not crossing elytral external edges in dorsal view. Legs: Protibial surface punctate dorsally, with two setose striae. Protibia with three well-developed external teeth posteriorly decreasing in size. Pygidium : Form 2.6 times wider than long, strongly convex. Disc and posterior edge glabrous, hirsute laterally, densely wrinkled on edges, larger and denser punctures medially. Genitalia: Parameres, in dorsal view, as in Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 ; in lateral view, thinner than apex of phallobase, lateral carina slightly curved at base ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ); in ventral view, apex round, ventral carina basally acute, inferior edge of parameres concave ( Fig. 6B View FIGURE 6 ).

Variation, males. Major males with cephalic horns about 2–4 times longer than vertex; body length 25.4–34.8 mm (n = 53) and pronotal width 12.1–15.5 mm (n = 53), as measured from the apex of the cephalic horns to the apices of the elytra; ocular canthi sometimes posteriorly shorter. Minor males ( Fig. 1B View FIGURE 1 ) with cephalic horns smaller or as long as vertex and frons together; body length 17.9–22.6 mm (n = 14) and pronotal width 9.2–11.6 mm (n = 14); thoracic horn short, tuberculate, not crossing anterior margin of pronotum nor crossing vertex; ocular canthi subtriangular, carina more notable; punctures of pronotum larger and stronger; parameres shorter and broader.

Measurements. Body length: 17.9–34.8 mm. Cephalic horns length: 1.2–8.1 mm. Elytral length: 11.4–18.5 mm. Elytral width: 6.8–10.6 mm. Pronotal width: 9.2–15.5 mm. Protibial length: 4.8–9.8 mm.

Females. Females are as males in general aspect, except the following ( Fig. 1C View FIGURE 1 ). Head: Cephalic horns absent; frons with two inconspicuous tubercles ( Fig. 7B View FIGURE 7 ); clypeus round, slightly concave from frontoclypeal suture to apex, punctures larger and denser, especially on clypeus, wrinkles in front of the tubercles ( Fig. 7A View FIGURE 7 ); punctures shallow and annular on vertex. Ocular canthi convex anteriorly, concave posteriorly, tip round; distance from canthi carina to canthi apex almost equal to canthi thickness ( Fig. 3B View FIGURE 3 ). Mouthparts: Labrum convex anteriorly, sides more round. Mandibles and teeth shorter, internal lobe more protruding, mesal brush sparsely covering the internal lobe ( Fig. 8A View FIGURE 8 ). Maxilla with stipes less hirsute, maxillary palpomere IV three times longer than wide, sensorial area shorter, striae sparser and distinct ( Fig. 4C View FIGURE 4 ). Mentum shorter, more hirsute on apex ( Fig. 8D View FIGURE 8 ).

Pronotum: Weakly convex; prothoracic horn absent; punctures large and dense, wrinkles absent. Scutellum: Punctures small on base, absent on apex. Pygidium: Convex , straight near apex; hirsute on sides, short bristles on middle; punctures coalescent and dense, merging with wrinkles laterally, punctures annular medially.

Measurements of females. Body length: 19.1–28.9 mm. Elytral length: 12.5–18.4 mm. Elytral width: 7.0– 10.6 mm. Head length: 2.5–4.1 mm. Pronotal width: 9.4–13.5 mm. Protibial length: 5.1–7.7 mm.

Geographic distribution. Brazil: Goiás, southern Minas Gerais, Mato Grosso do Sul, Paraná, and Distrito Federal ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ).

Material examined. Holotype male (MNHN) labeled: a) “Bias”; b) “Ex-Musaeo / JAMES THOMSON”; c) “Bolbocerida / Brés int Thoms / Type”; d) MUSÉUM PARIS / 1952 / COLL R. OBERTHUR”; e) “ Lectotypus / Agaocephala bolbocerida / Thomson”; f) “ LECTOTYPE ”; g) “MNHN / EC2464”. Other specimens: 100 males and 50 females ( CERPE, EPGC) labeled: “ BRASIL, DF, Brasília , / 1100 m, 23.xii.1988, / Luz, ‘ Mortos em palha de / Arroz’, P. & E. Grossi Legs.”; 1 male, 1 female ( EPGC): “ BRASIL, Distrito / Federal, Planaltina, / Núcleo Rural Taquara, / Chácara 70, 10.vii.2005, / ‘coleta manual em raiz de hortaliças’, / C. M. Oliveira col.”; 1 male, 1 female ( EPGC): “ BRASIL, DF, Brasília / Asa Norte, x.2015 / Embrapa CENARGEN, M.O. Breda ”; 1 male ( EPGC): “ BRASIL, Distrito Federal, / Planaltina, Embrapa Cerrados , / 19.xi.2012, ‘coleta manual’, / C. M. Oliveira ”; 4 males, 1 female ( EPGC): “ BRASIL, Goiás, / Formosa, / 01.xi.1996, J. Ampessar leg.”; 1 male ( CERPE): “ BRASIL, Paraná, / Ponta Grossa, / Lageado, xii.1942 ”; 1 male ( CERPE): “ BRASIL, Mato Grosso do Sul, / Dourados, xi.2000, / L. R. Moraes leg.”; 1 male ( EPGC): “ BRASIL, Minas Gerais, / Lavras, UFLA, / 01.xi.1992, Silvio Gusmão leg.”; 2 males ( UFRN): “ BRASIL, Distrito Federal, / Guará ”.

Remarks. The redescription of A. bolboceridus is based on specimens collected by P.C.G. and his father, Everardo J. Grossi, in Brasília and additional material from other states in Brazil, after comparison with the lectotype. The lectotype is a very small specimen with the genitalia missing ( Dechambre & Grossi 1990). However, the other external traits of the lectotype are shared with small-horned males from Brasília municipality, including body color, pronotal punctation, and ocular canthi shape. Within the species group, A. bolboceridus has the broadest geographic distribution in the Cerrado, despite not occurring in localities where A. diceratops and A. vazdemelloi were found. For comparisons among these species, see the Remarks section of both new species.

UFRN

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Scarabaeidae

SubFamily

Dynastinae

Genus

Aegopsis

Loc

Aegopsis bolboceridus ( Thomson, 1860 )

Sobral, Rafael, Grossi, Paschoal C. & De Morais, José W. 2018
2018
Loc

Aegopsis bolboceridus: Dechambre & Grossi 1990 : 239

Neita-Moreno, J. C. & Oliveira, C. M. & Moron, M. A. 2014: 114
Oliveira, C. M. & Frizzas, M. R. 2013: 1
Oliveira, C. M. & Moron, M. A. & Frizzas, M. R. 2008: 324
Dechambre, R. - P. 1999: 174
Lachaume, G. 1992: 28
Dechambre, R. - P. & Grossi, E. J. 1990: 239
1990
Loc

Brachysiderus bolbocerida:

Blackwelder, R. E. 1944: 260
Prell, H. 1934: 58
1934
Loc

Agacephala bolbocerida:

Endrodi, S. 1985: 213
Endrodi, S. 1970: 52
Thomson, J. 1860: 19
1860
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF