Thomasomys erro Anthony, 1926
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0082(2003)421<0001:ANSOTR>2.0.CO;2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5607556 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FAB267-FFAB-FFD4-FC96-FD12DAC6D9B8 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Thomasomys erro Anthony |
status |
|
Figures 11–13 View Fig View Fig View Fig
SPECIMENS COLLECTED: 6.2 km (by road) W Papallacta, 11,700 ft (UMMZ 155711); Río Papallacta valley [3–5 km by trail NNW Papallacta], 11,100 ft (UMMZ 155640– 155642, 155712, 155713); 1.4 km (by road) E Papallacta (AMNH 248283; UMMZ 155633–155639, 155709, 155710); 9 km (by road) E Papallacta, 9280 ft (UMMZ 127133).
OTHER MATERIAL: None.
TAXONOMY: Thomasomys erro was originally described on the basis of a single specimen ( AMNH 68195 About AMNH ) collected by the Olallas GoogleMaps on the ‘‘upper slopes of Mt. Sumaco GoogleMaps , exact altitude unknown, but probably 8000– 9000 feet [2440–2740 m], at head of the Río Suno GoogleMaps , a tributary of the Río GoogleMaps Napo, eastern Ecuador; June 10, 1924 ’’ ( Anthony, 1926: 5). Although GoogleMaps only about 50 km SE of Papallacta, Volcán Sumaco GoogleMaps (0°34'S, 77°38'W) is an isolated peak that is separated from the main range of the Cordillera Oriental GoogleMaps by the lowland valley of the Río Quijos GoogleMaps (fig. 14). Populations GoogleMaps of montane organisms on the upper slopes of Sumaco are therefore likely to be ecologically disjunct from those in the vicinity of Papallacta.
The Papallacta specimens are the only additional material of Thomasomys erro to have been collected since 1924 and merit close comparison with the holotype ( AMNH 68195 About AMNH ). No noteworthy differences in pelage color or other external characters are apparent, however. The skull of AMNH 68195 About AMNH is partially crushed, so only an incomplete set of measurements can be taken, but most of these fall within the range of variation observed among the Papallacta specimens; the exceptions are two molar dimensions in which the type is slightly larger ( table 6). In all qualitative craniodental comparisons, the holotype appears to be indistinguishable from the Papallacta series and appears to represent the same taxon.
Cabrera (1961) listed Thomasomys erro as a subspecies of T. cinereiventer Allen (1912) without explanation, and no discussion of character information has been published to justify the current treatment of erro as a junior synonym of that species (e.g., by Musser and Carleton, 1993). However, sidebyside comparisons of the holotypes and other representative material of erro and cinereiventer do not support the hypothesis that these taxa are conspecific. Among other differences, typical cinereiventer from the Cordillera Occidental of southern Colombia 7 is a much bigger animal with longer hind feet (33–36 mm); deeper zygomatic notches; less inflated interorbital region; more strongly convergent zygomatic arches; more elongate (less globular) braincase; broader and more vertically oriented zygomatic plates; consistently separate buccinatormasticatory and accessory oval foramina; larger (5.7–6.2 mm), incipiently lophodont molars with interpenetrating lingual and labial flexi (see illustrations and discussion of this trait in Voss, 1993); and relatively much broader incisors. Other Colombian taxa that are currently considered to be subspecies or synonyms of T. cinereiventer —including contradictus Anthony (1925) from the Cordillera Central and dispar Anthony (1925) from the Cordillera Oriental—are smaller than the nominotypical form but do not exhibit any other noteworthy similarities with T. erro .
FIELD OBSERVATIONS: I collected 17 specimens of Thomasomys erro in the vicinity of Papallacta , at elevations ranging from 2830 to 3570 m. Of these, 11 were taken in dense secondary vegetation, 5 in Subalpine Rain Forest, and 1 in Upper Montane Rain Forest. All recorded captures were on the ground. Eleven specimens were trapped in runways through wet leaf litter and mossy debris; three were trapped beneath mossy logs, branches, or roots; and one was trapped inside the trunk of a hollow tree .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.