Thomasomys erro Anthony, 1926

VOSS, ROBERT S., 2003, A New Species of Thomasomys (Rodentia: Muridae) from Eastern Ecuador, with Remarks on Mammalian Diversity and Biogeography in the Cordillera Oriental, American Museum Novitates 3421, pp. 1-48 : 30-32

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0082(2003)421<0001:ANSOTR>2.0.CO;2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5607556

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FAB267-FFAB-FFD4-FC96-FD12DAC6D9B8

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Thomasomys erro Anthony
status

 

Thomasomys erro Anthony

Figures 11–13 View Fig View Fig View Fig

SPECIMENS COLLECTED: 6.2 km (by road) W Papallacta, 11,700 ft (UMMZ 155711); Río Papallacta valley [3–5 km by trail NNW Papallacta], 11,100 ft (UMMZ 155640– 155642, 155712, 155713); 1.4 km (by road) E Papallacta (AMNH 248283; UMMZ 155633–155639, 155709, 155710); 9 km (by road) E Papallacta, 9280 ft (UMMZ 127133).

OTHER MATERIAL: None.

TAXONOMY: Thomasomys erro was originally described on the basis of a single specimen ( AMNH 68195 About AMNH ) collected by the Olallas   GoogleMaps on the ‘‘upper slopes of Mt. Sumaco   GoogleMaps , exact altitude unknown, but probably 8000– 9000 feet [2440–2740 m], at head of the Río Suno   GoogleMaps , a tributary of the Río   GoogleMaps Napo, eastern Ecuador; June 10, 1924 ’’ ( Anthony, 1926: 5). Although   GoogleMaps only about 50 km SE of Papallacta, Volcán Sumaco   GoogleMaps (0°34'S, 77°38'W) is an isolated peak that is separated from the main range of the Cordillera Oriental   GoogleMaps by the lowland valley of the Río Quijos   GoogleMaps (fig. 14). Populations   GoogleMaps of montane organisms on the upper slopes of Sumaco are therefore likely to be ecologically disjunct from those in the vicinity of Papallacta.

The Papallacta specimens are the only additional material of Thomasomys erro to have been collected since 1924 and merit close comparison with the holotype ( AMNH 68195 About AMNH ). No noteworthy differences in pelage color or other external characters are apparent, however. The skull of AMNH 68195 About AMNH is partially crushed, so only an incomplete set of measurements can be taken, but most of these fall within the range of variation observed among the Papallacta specimens; the exceptions are two molar dimensions in which the type is slightly larger ( table 6). In all qualitative craniodental comparisons, the holotype appears to be indistinguishable from the Papallacta series and appears to represent the same taxon.

Cabrera (1961) listed Thomasomys erro as a subspecies of T. cinereiventer Allen (1912) without explanation, and no discussion of character information has been published to justify the current treatment of erro as a junior synonym of that species (e.g., by Musser and Carleton, 1993). However, side­by­side comparisons of the holotypes and other representative material of erro and cinereiventer do not support the hypothesis that these taxa are conspecific. Among other differences, typical cinereiventer from the Cordillera Occidental of southern Colombia 7 is a much bigger animal with longer hind feet (33–36 mm); deeper zygomatic notches; less inflated interorbital region; more strongly convergent zygomatic arches; more elongate (less globular) braincase; broader and more vertically oriented zygomatic plates; consistently separate buccinator­masticatory and accessory oval foramina; larger (5.7–6.2 mm), incipiently lophodont molars with interpenetrating lingual and labial flexi (see illustrations and discussion of this trait in Voss, 1993); and relatively much broader incisors. Other Colombian taxa that are currently considered to be subspecies or synonyms of T. cinereiventer —including contradictus Anthony (1925) from the Cordillera Central and dispar Anthony (1925) from the Cordillera Oriental—are smaller than the nominotypical form but do not exhibit any other noteworthy similarities with T. erro .

FIELD OBSERVATIONS: I collected 17 specimens of Thomasomys erro in the vicinity of Papallacta , at elevations ranging from 2830 to 3570 m. Of these, 11 were taken in dense secondary vegetation, 5 in Subalpine Rain Forest, and 1 in Upper Montane Rain Forest. All recorded captures were on the ground. Eleven specimens were trapped in runways through wet leaf litter and mossy debris; three were trapped beneath mossy logs, branches, or roots; and one was trapped inside the trunk of a hollow tree .

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Mammalia

Order

Rodentia

Family

Muridae

Genus

Thomasomys

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF