Rhizoglyphus echinopus (Fumouze & Robin, 1868)
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.22073/pja.v11i4.75059 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7398889 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F4101F-C31E-FFB8-FE31-FCC1FF372C4E |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Rhizoglyphus echinopus (Fumouze & Robin, 1868) |
| status |
|
Rhizoglyphus echinopus (Fumouze & Robin, 1868)
Distribution in Iran – Isfahan, Khuzestan, Tehran, and West Azerbaijan provinces: Region not mentioned ( Kaussari 1948; Farahbakhsh 1961; Sepasgozarian 1977, 1978a; Daneshvar 1978a, b, c; Behdad 1988; Shahhosseini and Kamali 1989; Sadeghi Namaghi 1990; Sadeghi Namaghi and Kamali 1993; Ostovan 1993; Mirfakhraii 1994; Modarres Awal 1994, 1997; Fathipour 1994; Ostovan and Kamali 1995a; 1996a), Razavi Khorasan Province: Mashhad ( Khaleghabadian et al. 2012) and Kordestan Province: Region not mentioned ( Maroufpoor and Ostovan 2017).
General distribution – Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Egypt, England, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Ireland, Japan, Korea, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Romania, Russia, Scotland, Spain, Taiwan, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States, Wales ( Hagstrum et al. 2013).
Collection place(s) – Bamboo shoots, bulb, Chinese medicine, fatty debris, flax seed, garlic, grain, herb, peanut, shallot, sunflower seed, wheat, wheat spillage (wet, decaying) ( Hagstrum et al. 2013).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.