Leucophenga latifascia, Huang, Jia, Li, Tong & Chen, Hongwei, 2014
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3893.1.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D0600C5C-DA06-47C5-80CD-4E625EBC6259 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5614878 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F387EC-FFD2-FFBD-54ED-FF597DEDFC0B |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Leucophenga latifascia |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Leucophenga latifascia View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 H, 8G–I, 11I –K, 16A, 16B, 33)
Diagnosis. This species is similar to L. multipunctata in the male terminalia, but can be distinguished from the latter by having the paramere slightly broadened and small process apically ( Fig. 33 View FIGURE 33 C); katepisternum and mesopleuron brownish yellow, each with brown patches ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 I).
Description. Ocellar triangle dark brown, with 2–5 setae above ocellar setae. Frons brownish to brown. Pedicel yellowish brown; first flagellomere yellow. Clypeus brown. Palpus brownish. Mesonotum brownish yellow to brown ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 G), sometimes with unapparent, brown longitudinal stripes ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 H). Postpronotal lobe yellow ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 I). Acrostichal setulae in 13–15 irregular rows ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 G, H). Scutellum yellowish brown to dark brown, pale at tip ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 G, H). Pleura with a brown, longitudinal stripe above ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 I). Wing ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 H): Costal vein between R2+3 and R4+5 distally with 5–8 peg-like spinules on ventral surface, and broad, brownish band diastally ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 H). Abdominal tergites brown to black, mostly with yellow patches ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 I–K). Male terminalia: Epandrium with pubescence and 5 setae near posterior and ventral margin per side ( Fig. 33 View FIGURE 33 A). Paramere broad, with 7 sensilla distodorsally and small process apically ( Fig. 33 View FIGURE 33 C). Aedeagus thick, with pubescence distally ( Fig. 33 View FIGURE 33 D).
Measurements. BL = 3.60 mm in holotype (range in 4♂ and 5♀ paratypes: 3.33–3.60 mm in ♂, 2.93–3.20 mm in ♀), THL = 1.73 mm (1.53–1.73 mm in ♂, 1.33–1.50 mm in ♀), WL = 2.83 mm (2.63–3.10 mm in ♂, 2.37–2.70 mm in ♀), WW = 1.35 mm (1.17–1.38 mm in ♂, 1.05–1.18 mm in ♀), arb = 9/4 (6–9/3–4), avd = 0.81 (0.83–0.89), adf = 1.59 (1.33–1.87), flw = 1.59 (1.06–1.93), FW/HW = 0.36 (0.35–0.40), ch/o = 0.03 (0.03–0.04), prorb = 0.54 (0.47–0.58), rcorb = 0.64 (0.52–0.72), vb = 0.38 (0.31–0.55), dcl = 0.48 (0.41–0.53), presctl = 0.53 (0.43–0.59), sctl = 1.19 (1.19–1.53), sterno = 0.77 (0.54–0.86), orbito = 1.64 (1.80–2.50), dcp = 0.23 (0.21–0.31), sctlp = 1.03 (0.96–1.36), C = 2.00 (1.70–2.19), 4c = 1.47 (1.42–1.71), 4v = 1.78 (1.58–2.56), 5x = 1.44 (0.94–1.33), ac = 3.53 (2.89–4.08), M = 0.64 (0.47–0.74), C3F = 0.92 (0.86–0.92).
Type specimens. Holotype ♂ ( SCAU, No. 123220), CHINA: Wangtianshu, Mengla, Yunnan, 580m, 11.ix.2002, ex tree trunk, HW Chen. Paratypes: CHINA: 2♂ ( SCAU, Nos 123221, 22), same data as holotype; 1♂ ( SCAU, No. 123004), Wuyishan, Fujian, 580m, 15–19.viii.2001, ex tree trunk, HW Chen; 1♂ ( SCAU, No. 123223), Dabang, Jiayi, Taiwan, 800m, 15.x.2012, ex tree trunk, HW Chen; 1♂ ( SCAU, No. 123224), Conghua, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 200m, 3.xi.2003, ex tree trunk, HW Chen; 1♂, 1♀ ( SCAU, Nos 123225, 26), Diaoluoshan, Lingshui, Hainan, 1000m, 18.v.2005, ex tussocks, MF Xu; 4♀ ( SCAU, Nos 123227–30), Menglun, Mengla, Yunnan, 900m, 12.viii.2002, 19.iv.2007, ex tree trunks, HW Chen; 1♂ ( SCAU, No. 123245), Hesong, Menghai, Yunnan, 1900m, 9.iv.2011, ex tree trunk, SJ Yan; 1♀ ( SCAU, No. 123246), Yixiang, Puer, Yunnan, 1400m, 13.v.2012, ex tree trunk, HW Chen; 2♀ ( SCAU, Nos 123247, 48), Tongmai, Bomi, Xizang, 2000m, 12.x.2010, ex tree trunks, YR Su.
Distribution. China (Fujian, Taiwan, Jiangxi, Guangdong, Hainan, Yunnan, Xizang).
Etymology. A combination of the Latin words “ latus ” (= broad) + “ fascia ” (= band), referring to the wing with brownish, broad band distally.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.