Gilpinia hakonensis (Matsumura, 1912)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4995.3.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AF31D6D4-AFD4-46A2-A400-29B0281810E0 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F1576F-FFCC-694A-FBB5-FCEFFED5F9B6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Gilpinia hakonensis |
status |
|
Gilpinia hakonensis and similar species
Common features. Three closely similar Japanese species, G. hakonensis , G. amamiana and G. okinawa , have the following features in common.
Females: Length 7.0– 10.5 mm; head capsule black, yellow to brown at most on postocellar area and its lat- eral area, lower medial part of face and gena ( Figs 1A–N View FIGURES 1 , 2A–H View FIGURES 2 ); abdomen dark brown to black at least on wide posterior margins of second to eighth terga and most of ovipositor sheath; wings clear transparent, at most slightly darkened on apical half; antenna with 19–23 antennomeres; flagellum uniserrate and serration of first flagellomere indistinct or very small ( Figs 3R–T, V–X View FIGURES 3 ); posterior hind-tibial spur simple, like rod or thorn ( Figs 1C, G View FIGURES 1 , 2C, H View FIGURES 2 ); seventh sternum posteromedially slightly concave and without paired lobes (Figs 4O–R); valvula 3 narrow and api- cally distinctly concave in dorsal view, with scopa small, about 1.5–2.0 × as wide as cercus and located at apex of apico-lateral projection of valvula 3 ( Figs 5A–L View FIGURES 5 ); lance with apical cleft short (often difficult to see), dorsal margin almost straight or very slightly concave in lateral view and posterior projection on processus articularis relatively large, narrow in dorsal view, ventrally expanded slightly beyond main body of a lance in lateral view, dorsally sharply ridged, and mostly fused with main body of lance ( Figs 5Q–U View FIGURES 5 ); lancet distinctly convex ventrally at second annulus, with sclerotized band of radix gently curved and narrower than or as wide as olistheter at twisted part, and first annulus without serrula and its ctenidium widely separated from ventral margin of lancet ( Figs 6A–J View FIGURES 6 ).
Males (unknown in G. okinawa ): Length 7.0–8.0 mm; antenna with 23–25 antennomeres ( Fig. 3U View FIGURES 3 ); genitalia in ventral view with inner margin of basiparamere horizontal, lateral margin of parapenis short ( Figs 7A–F View FIGURES 7 ); penis valve with very long ergot and spinose lateral swelling near apex.
Remarks. Gilpinia hakonensis , G. amamiana and G. okinawa , are distinguished from other species of Gilpinia by the diagnostic features stated above. For details of the differences between these three and each of other congeners, compare the above features with Takeuchi (1940), Gussakovskij (1947), Okutani (1958), Smith (1971, 1974, 1983), Saini & Thind (1993), Xiao et al. (1984, 1985), Viitasaari & Varama (1987), Zhelochovtsev & Zinovjev (1988), Xiao (1992), Xu (1997), Hara & Shinohara (2015) and Wang et al. (2019a, b).
In the G. socia group, the females of the three Japanese species are characterized by having the valvula 3 with a small scopa located at the apex of the apico-lateral projection ( Figs 5A–L View FIGURES 5 ) and the posterior projection on the pro- cessus articularis of lance relatively large, mostly fused with the main body of the lance, narrow in the dorsal view and ventrally expanded slightly beyond the main body of the lance in lateral view ( Figs 5Q–U View FIGURES 5 ). These features are also found in the females of two European species of the group, G. frutetorum and G. laricis ( Figs 5M–P View FIGURES 5 , 7C–F View FIGURES 7 ). The female of G. frutetorum is rather different from the females of the three Japanese species. It has the valvula 3 distinctly tapering and apically indistinctly concave in dorsal view, and with a scopa about as wide as or slightly narrower than a cercus ( Figs 5M, N View FIGURES 5 ), and the lancet with a sclerotized band of radix sharply bent and wider than an olistheter at the twisted part ( Figs 9B, C View FIGURES 9 ). The females of the three Japanese species have the valvula 3 apically not or slightly tapering and apically concave in dorsal view, and with a scopa about 1.5–2.0 × as wide as a cercus ( Figs 5A–L View FIGURES 5 ), and the lancet with a sclerotized band of radix gently curved and narrower than or as wide as an olistheter at the twisted part ( Figs 6A–J View FIGURES 6 ). The female of G. laricis is difficult to distinguish from those of the three Japanese species and its ovipositor sheath is almost identical with the latter (compare Figs 5O, P View FIGURES 5 with Figs 5A–L View FIGURES 5 ). One of the distinctive features of the female of G. laricis is the black mesoscutellum with a pair of large yellow spots (cf. Enslin 1917; Gussakovskij 1947; Viitasaari & Varama 1987; Zhelochovtsev & Zinovjev 1988; see also photos in Taeger et al. 2018). The mesoscutellum of the female of G. hakonensis is entirely black (Fig. 4E), mostly yellow (Fig. 4C), or black with a pair of vague brown spots (Fig. 4A) or a pair of distinct yellow spots as in the female of G. laricis (fig. 159, p. 52 in Hara 2020). The mesoscutellum of G. amamiana female is mostly yellow (Fig. 4I), sometimes with a brown median longitudinal band ( Fig. 2C View FIGURES 2 ). The mesoscutellum of G. okinawa female is almost entirely red yellow (Fig. 4M). The lancet of G. laricis is slightly but distinctly different from those of the three species. The former has a first ctenidium close to the ventral margin of lancet, the sclerotized band of radix barely curved at the twisted part and the serrula of second annulus with the postcalcar very widely separated from the precalcar ( Figs 9D, E View FIGURES 9 ), whereas the latter have the first ctenidium widely separated from the ventral margin of lancet, the sclerotized band of radix distinctly curved at the twisted part and the serrula of second annulus with the postcalcar not so widely separated from the precalcar ( Figs 6A–J View FIGURES 6 ).
The males of G. hakonensis and G. amamiana have the penis valve with a lateral swelling near the apex ( Figs 7A, C, D, F View FIGURES 7 ). This feature is known in Gilpinia only for G. frutetorum . However, the penis valve of G. frutetorum has an inconspicuous ergot (fig. 30h in Viitasaari & Varama 1987), while those of G. hakonensis and G. amamiana have a very long ergot ( Figs 7C, F View FIGURES 7 ). Although the female of G. laricis is very similar to the females of G. hakonensis and G. amamiana , the male penis valve of G. laricis is quite different from those of the two Japanese species (compare fig. 30j in Viitasaari & Varama 1987 with Figs 7C, F View FIGURES 7 ). It is only slightly curved, without a lateral swelling and a distinct ergot.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |