Cibyra stigmatica ( Pfitzner, 1937 )

Mielke, Carlos G. C., Grehan, John R. & Koike, Ricardo M., 2025, Review of the genus Cibyra Walker (Lepidoptera: Hepialoidea: Hepialidae) with descriptions of twenty-four new species from Brazil and Argentina, Zootaxa 5709 (1), pp. 1-74 : 17-18

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5709.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D3B12545-635D-4AEF-BD58-57B99B88DE48

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EDC94D-FF8E-D354-20E0-B6B5EAAAF897

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Cibyra stigmatica ( Pfitzner, 1937 )
status

 

Cibyra stigmatica ( Pfitzner, 1937) View in CoL

Pl. 3 View PLATE 3 : Figs 1–5 View PLATE 1 , Pl. 10: Fig. 11 View PLATE 1 , Pl. 13: Fig. 5 View PLATE 1 , Pl. 15: Fig. 1 View PLATE 1 , Pl. 19: Fig. 11 View PLATE 1 , Pl. 23: Fig. 5 View PLATE 1 , Pl. 24: Fig. 5 View PLATE 1

Dalaca stigmatica Pfitzner (1937: 1296 View in CoL ; pl. 100b ([ ♀] dorsal)); no data; coll. Seitz; [SMFL] (examined).— Zukowski (1954: 93); as synonym of Dalaca tesselloides Schaus, 1901 View in CoL .— Nielsen & Robinson (1983: 21).— Robinson & Nielsen (1984: 17).— Nielsen et al. (2000: 844).

Cibyra stigmatica View in CoL : Mielke & Grehan (2012: 137); lectotype ♀ with the following labels: / stigmatica, Sa Catarina View in CoL (?) od. Costarica/ Coll. A. Seitz/; SMFL (examined)— Grehan (2012: 4, 5, 23; fig. (valva, intermediate plate, venation)).— Favretto (2016: 72).— Grehan et al. (2023: 77).

Diagnosis. Distinguished from all the previous species by the concave posterior margin of the saccus, narrowly V-shaped, with the corner of the projection nearly right angle (Pl. 15: Fig. 1 View PLATE 1 ; see arrow). Along with C. barbara sp. nov. and C. mariana sp. nov., C. stigmatica shows all wings more rounded and a lighter brown stripe running over M 2 within the cell and then continuing between Rs4 and M 1 ( Pl. 3 View PLATE 3 : Figs 1–4 View PLATE 1 ), instead of dark brown in the two former species ( Pl. 3 View PLATE 3 : Figs 6–9 View PLATE 1 , 13–14 View PLATE 2 ). This contrast facilitates identification.

Examined material (in total 135 ♂ 99 ♀). Brazil. Paraná. Imbaú, 800 m: 1 ♂, 10.III.1995, C. Mielke leg. (CGCM 7.220; CGCM). Tibagi, Guartelá, 1000 m: 1 ♂, 25.II.1997, C. Mielke leg. (CGCM 6.243; CGCM). São José dos Pinhais, Morro do Meio: 1 ♂, 8.I.1970, V.O. Becker & Laroca leg. (CGCM 15.689; CGCM). Tijucas do Sul, Vossoroca, 850 m: 1 ♀, 11.III.1989, C. Mielke leg. (CGCM 23.691; CGCM). Santa Catarina. São Bento do Sul, 800 m: 1 ♀, 14.III.1998, C. Mielke leg. (CGCM 769; CGCM). São Bento do Sul, Rio Natal, 500–700 m: 5 ♂ 1 ♀, 20–21.II.1996, A. Rank leg. (CGCM 4.361, 4.583, 5.333, 5.368, 5.486, 5.578; CGCM); 4 ♂ 1 ♀, 10–29.I.1997, A. Rank leg. (CGCM 4.057, 4.525, 4.570, 4.722, 5.030; CGCM); 1 ♂ 1 ♀, 4–5.II.1997, A. Rank leg. (CGCM 5.504, 5.836; CGCM); 1 ♂, 9.III.1997, A. Rank leg. (CGCM 6.027; CGCM); 3 ♀, 13–23.I.1998, A. Rank leg. (CGCM 6.188, 6.237, 6.522; CGCM); 1 ♂ 1 ♀, 23–25.II.1998, A. Rank leg. (CGCM 4.081, 5.769; CGCM); 1 ♂, 16.I.2001, O. Rank leg. (CGCM 6.021; CGCM); 3 ♂ 3 ♀, I.2001, A. Rank leg. (CGCM 1.800, 1.981, 2.238, 5.766, 6.303, 7.793; CGCM); 1 ♂, 10.II.2001, O. Rank leg. (CGCM 7.449; CGCM); 2 ♀, 25.II.2001, A. Rank leg. (CGCM 6.718, 7.068; CGCM); 1 ♀, 2.III.2001, A. Rank leg. (CGCM 5.693; CGCM); 5 ♀, 5–20.II.2002, A. Rank leg. (CGCM 480, 1.626, 1.816, 2.125, 2.254; CGCM); 1 ♀, 7.II.2003, A. Rank leg. (CGCM 5.062; CGCM); 1 ♂ 1 ♀, I.2004, A. Rank leg. (CGCM 13.744, 13.902; CGCM); 7 ♂ 6 ♀, 9–15.II.2004, O. Rank leg. (CGCM 11.793, 22.557, 23.117, 23.133, 23.149, 23.181, 23.197, 23.231, 23.274, 23.280, 23.355, 23.402, 23.759; CGCM); 2 ♂ 4 ♀, II.2004, A. Rank leg. (CGCM 13.662, 13.817, 13.833, 13.865, 14.896, 16.395; CGCM); 1 ♂ 1 ♀, III.2004, A. Rank leg. (CGCM 13.624, 13.627; CGCM); 1 ♂ 11 ♀, 17–28.I.2005, O. Rank leg. (CGCM 17.639, 17.831, 17.991, 18.007, 18.055, 18.087, 18.119, 18.199, 18.263, 18.295, 18.343, 18.391; CGCM); 3 ♂ 7 ♀, I.2005, A. Rank leg. (CGCM 17.651, 17.879, 17.927, 17.943, 18.039, 18.150, 18.215, 18.279, 18.342, 18.371; CGCM); 1 ♂, 5.II.2005, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 18.427; CGCM); 1 ♂ 3 ♀, 7–15.II.2005, O. Rank leg. (CGCM 17.815, 18.053, 18.359, 23.165; CGCM); 3 ♂ 3 ♀, II.2005, A. Rank leg. (CGCM 17.623, 17.669, 17.863, 18.309, 18.375, 22.412; CGCM); 1 ♀, II.2006, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 19.528; CGCM). São Bento do Sul, Rio Vermelho, 700–900 m: 2 ♀, 9–18.II.1992, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 22.847, 23.835; CGCM); 1 ♀, 29.II.1992, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 5.946; CGCM); 4 ♂, I.1993, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 5.990, 6.115, 7.451, 7.886; CGCM); 1 ♂ 2 ♀, 6–17.II.1993, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 5.977, 6.230, 23.134; CGCM); 1 ♀, 2.III.1993, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 23.770; CGCM); 1 ♂, 9.II.1994, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 7.827; CGCM); 1 ♂, 5.II.1995, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 6.416; CGCM); 1 ♂, 20.XII.1995, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 4.352; CGCM); 1 ♂ 1 ♀, 14–19.I.1997, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 4.427, 5.525; CGCM); 1 ♀, 3.II.1997, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 4.406; CGCM); 1 ♂, 26.II.1997, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 4.127; CGCM); 1 ♂, 21.XII.1997, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 6.964; CGCM); 1 ♀, 25.II.1998, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 5.195; CGCM); 1 m # 3 ♀, 26.I.1999, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 4.101, 5.034, 5.266, 5.457; CGCM); 1 ♂, 26.I.1999, O. Rank leg. (CGCM 7.507; CGCM); 3 ♂ 1 ♀, 9–18.II.1999, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 4.014, 4.978, 5.066, 5.259; CGCM); 1 ♂, 20.III.1999, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 7.135; CGCM); 1 ♂, 28.I.2000, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 6.629; CGCM); 2 ♂ 1 ♀, 6–23.II.2000, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 6.205, 7.198, 7.347; CGCM); 1 ♂, 16.I.2001, O. Rank leg. (CGCM 7.373; CGCM); 5 ♂ 1 ♀, I.2001, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 4.227, 5.000, 5.575, 6.275, 6.429, 7.185; CGCM); 2 ♂, 3.II.2001, O. Rank leg. (CGCM 6.520, 7.616; CGCM); 15 ♂, 6 ♀, II.2001, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 4.041, 4.073, 4.325, 4.433, 4.630, 5.033, 5.038, 5.111, 5.385, 5.672, 5.825, 5.941, 6.220, 6.336, 6.518, 6.717, 7.113, 7.552, 7.966; CGCM); 1 ♂, 21.III.2001, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 7.832; CGCM); 16 ♂ 10 ♀, II.2002, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 4.148, 4.170, 4.211, 4.312, 4.384, 4.451, 4.466, 4.539, 4.607, 4.765, 4.970, 5.086, 5.097, 5.147, 5.253, 5.290, 5.297, 5.348, 5.403, 5.480, 5.498, 5.506, 5.582, 5.924, 6.651, 6.723; CGCM); 1 ♂, 5.III.2002, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 4.997; CGCM); 6 ♂ 2 ♀, I.2003, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 5.075, 5.709, 5.768, 6.048, 6.148, 7.436, 7.668, 7.939; CGCM); 2 ♂, 23.II.2003, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 4.025, 4.914; CGCM); 7 ♂ 1 ♀, 11–27.I.2004, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 13.711, 13.726, 13.727, 13.743, 13.880, 14.096, 14.190, 14.205; CGCM); 1 ♂, 25.II.2004, L. Rank leg. (CGCM 16.564; CGCM); 7 ♂ 2 ♀, II.2004, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 13.647, 13.774, 13.790, 13.806, 13.854, 13.870, 14.177, 14.210, 14.226; CGCM); 2 ♂, 21.IV.2004, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 14.188, 14.367; CGCM); 1 ♂ 3 ♀, 13–20.II.2006, I. Rank leg. (CGCM 19.914, 20.018, 22.444, 22.556; CGCM); 1 ♂, 5.II.2009, O. Rank leg. (CGCM 25.262; CGCM). Urubici, Serra do Panelão, 1250 m: 2 ♂ 1 ♀, 14–16.II.1999, C. Mielke leg. (CGCM 39, 715, 753; CGCM); 1 ♀, 5.III.2000, C. Mielke leg. (CGCM 2.162; CGCM); 1 ♂, 22.II.2004, T. Decaëns leg. (CGCM 22.616; CGCM). Urubici, Morro da Igreja, 1350 m: 5 ♂, 15–18.III.1998, C. Mielke & E. Joerke leg. (CGCM 36.351, 36.421, 36.423, 36.443, 36.448; CGCM).

Male ( Pl. 3 View PLATE 3 : Figs 1–4 View PLATE 1 , Pl. 10: Fig. 11 View PLATE 1 ). Forewing length: 15–20 mm, wingspan: 32–42 mm. Epiphysis present.

Male genitalia (Pl. 15: Fig. 1 View PLATE 1 , Pl. 19: Fig. 11 View PLATE 1 ). Saccus with posterior edge concave, slightly V-shaped, with corner of projection at right angle. Tergal lobes extended posteriorly. Pseudotegumen reinforced anteriorly and posteriorly. Fultura inferior as long as wide, bilobed dorsally. Valvae with tip rounded.

Female ( Pl. 3 View PLATE 3 : Fig. 5 View PLATE 1 , Pl. 13: Fig. 5 View PLATE 1 ). Forewing length: 23–35 mm, wingspan: 44–64 mm.

Female genitalia (Pl. 23: Fig. 5 View PLATE 1 , Pl. 24: Fig. 5 View PLATE 1 ). Lamella antevaginalis slightly sclerotized, only its latero-posterior dorsal edge densely sclerotised, forming a triangular process; each well separated medially by a shallow bilobed projection, slightly sclerotised and setose, antero-ventrally. Ductus bursae tubular, ca. 2.5× longer than pyriform corpus bursae.

Distribution. Central-southern Paraná to eastern Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil at altitudes between about 500 to 1350 m (Pl. 25: Fig. 2 View PLATE 1 ).

Remarks. This species is relatively common in the northeastern Santa Catarina from mid to late summer. While males have a highly variable FW ornamentation, females do not. The species is sympatric and synchronic with C. monoargenteus and C. ybyra within this species-group.

The original description is an image of the adult female with few details about FW ornamentation. The male and female genitalia are here figured for the first time.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Lepidoptera

Family

Hepialidae

Genus

Cibyra

Loc

Cibyra stigmatica ( Pfitzner, 1937 )

Mielke, Carlos G. C., Grehan, John R. & Koike, Ricardo M. 2025
2025
Loc

Cibyra stigmatica

Grehan, J. R. & Mielke, C. G. C. & Turner, J. R. G. & Nielsen, J. E. 2023: 77
Favretto, M. A. 2016: 72
Mielke, C. G. C. & Grehan, J. R. 2012: 137
Grehan, J. R. 2012: 4
2012
Loc

Dalaca stigmatica

Nielsen, E. S. & Robinson, G. S. & Wagner, D. L. 2000: 844
Robinson, G. S. & Nielsen, E. S. 1984: 17
Nielsen, E. S. & Robinson, G. S. 1983: 21
Zukowski, B. 1954: 93
Pfitzner, R. 1937: 1296
1937
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF