Ocrisiona jovialis (L. Koch, 1879) L. Koch, 1879
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3664.4.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8E88DF35-70E0-4C21-BC8B-F4F5C85E307D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3499742 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EC879B-FFA7-FF92-7B85-947726FADBB7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ocrisiona jovialis (L. Koch, 1879) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Ocrisiona jovialis (L. Koch, 1879) View in CoL comb. nov.
Marptusa jovialis L. Koch, 1879: 1109 , pl. 97, fig. 1–2.
Breda jovialis Simon, 1909: 198 ; Hickman, 1967: 87, fig. 153–154; Davies & Żabka, 1989: 256, pl. 58; Platnick, 2013.
Maddison et al. (2008) showed that the Australian species Marptusa jovialis L. Koch , included in Breda by Simon (1909), belongs to the Astioida clade and is closely related to the genus Holoplatys Simon , a group of low carapace, elongate spiders, also from Australia. In fact, besides the flattened body, “ Breda ” jovialis , Menemerus bracteatus (L. Koch, 1879) , which is not a true Menemerus , and species of the genera Holoplatys and Ocrisiona , share the same epigynal configuration, copulatory ducts projecting forwards from median copulatory openings, curving laterally and folding backwards, forming an “M” (See Davies & Żabka, 1989). This could be a synapomorphy grouping these species. The phylogenetic limits of Ocrisiona and Holoplatys and the inclusion of this species in Ocrisiona , however, need to be revised in the future.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |