Portanus spherae, Anselmini & Prando & Takiya, 2022

Anselmini, Luiza Silva, Prando, Jádila Santos & Takiya, Daniela Maeda, 2022, Diversity of Portanini (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) from Parque Nacional do Itatiaia, Southeastern Brazil, with descriptions of two new species, Zootaxa 5174 (5), pp. 583-595 : 588-590

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5174.5.6

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FE54D0F3-8F44-432D-AFC6-289F48F96A2D

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6987109

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EC1527-ED6D-FFDD-FF6A-86DA424B5FFB

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Portanus spherae
status

sp. nov.

Portanus spherae View in CoL sp. nov.

( Figs 20–37 View FIGURES 20–29 View FIGURES 30–37 )

Diagnosis. Body mostly brown mottled with ivory ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 20–29 ). Anterior margin of crown with two distinct interocellar white spots ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 20–29 ). Male pygofer with a pair of long posteroventral spiniform processes ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 20–29 ). Aedeagus ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 20–29 ), in lateral view, L-shaped with robust and mostly straight shaft; dorsal apodemes long. Female internal sternite VIII ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 30–37 ) sclerotized.

Measurements (mm). Male holotype: total length 6.26; crown length 0.46; transocular width 1.64; interocular width 0.88; maximum pronotal width 0.63; maximum pronotal length 1.58; forewing length 5.23. Male paratypes (n=3)/Female paratypes (n=3): total length 6.33/6.38; crown length 0.50/0.50; transocular width 1.61/1.67; interocular width 0.85/0.87; maximum pronotal width 1.55/1.57; maximum pronotal length 0.68/0.69; forewing length 5.22/5.24.

Coloration. Dorsum ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 20–29 ) mostly brown mottled with ivory. Crown ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 20–29 ) lighter posteriorly and darker anteriorly; two distinct interocellar white spots; apex margined with black. Ocelli yellow. Eyes bluish-white (varies among specimens and preservation methods). Transition crown-face with transverse white band ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 20–29 ). Forewings ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 20–29 ) translucent; basal veins of apical cells ivory surrounded by dark brown; apex dark brown. Legs light brown with hind first and second tarsomeres with small dark brown maculae at middle. Venter ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 20–29 ) light brown.

External morphology. Crown ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 20–29 ) with median length three-tenths transocular width; anterior margin angulate; lateral frontal sutures not reaching ocelli. Pronotum ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 20–29 ) slightly narrower than transocular width; dorsolateral carina ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 20–29 ) inconspicuous; posterior margin almost straight. Forewing ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 20–29 ) with conspicuous venation; three closed anteapical cells, median one slightly longer than others; first and fourth apical cells subquadrangular, second and third subrectangular. Hind leg with femoral setal formula 2+2+1; tibia with rows AD and PD both with a row of long cucullate setae (10 in holotype) intercalated by few shorter cucullate ones at AD and single longer one at PD.

Male genitalia. Pygofer lobe ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 20–29 ), in lateral view, longer than high; long basiventral spiniform process extending well beyond pygofer apex and strongly curved ventrally; posterior margin rounded; few microsetae distributed at dorsal fourth. Valve ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 20–29 ), in ventral view, subrectangular and wide; posterior margin straight. Subgenital plate ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 20–29 ), in lateral view, extending posteriorly farther than pygofer apex; basal third without transverse unpigmented line; ventral surface of apical two-thirds with uniseriate row of robust and long macrosetae (13 in holotype) and few microsetae; apex slightly turned upwards. Connective ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 20–29 ), in dorsal view, Y-shaped; basiventral process short. Style ( Figs 27–28 View FIGURES 20–29 ), in dorsal view, long and narrow, extending posteriorly much beyond connective apex; with apical third wide and appearing bifid because of an elongate and robust preapical lobe. Aedeagus ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 20–29 ), in lateral view, L-shaped; preatrium well developed; dorsal apodemes long; shaft robust and almost straight, without processes. Anal tube ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 20–29 ) with segment X long and without processes.

Female genitalia. Sternite VII ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 30–37 ), in ventral view, approximately rectangular; posterior margin broadly rounded. Internal sternite VIII ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 30–37 ) with sclerotized regions, an anterior longitudinal median area and two elongated subtriangular lateral regions. Pygofer lobe ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 30–37 ), in lateral view, longer than high; subtriangular; macrosetae distributed on posterior two-thirds; apex acute. First valvifer ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 30–37 ) subquadrangular. Gonangulum ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 30–37 ) well developed and falciform. First valvula ( Figs 33–34 View FIGURES 30–37 ), in lateral view, expanded at apical third; dorsal sculptured area at apical third strigate; ventral sculptured area at apex strigate; apex acute. Second valvifer ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 30–37 ) approximately oval; small sclerotized dentiform process at apical two-thirds of posterior margin. Second valvula ( Fig. 35–36 View FIGURES 30–37 ), in lateral view, expanded at apical two-thirds; with approximately 32 separate subtriangular teeth without denticles (n=1); without preapical prominence; ventroapical margin serrate. Gonoplac ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 30–37 ) expanded at apical half; apex rounded with approximately three macrosetae (n=1).

Type material. Holotype: ♂, “ BRASIL: RJ, Resende , Parque \ Nacional do Itatiaia, 22°23’38.9”S,\ 44°39’59.7”W, 2255m,\ 26.VII.2014, Malaise, Monteiro et\ al. Col.”, DZRJ (DZRJ-AUCH-0263). GoogleMaps

Paratypes: 1 ♀, same label data as holotype, except 4.IX.2014, DZRJ (DZRJ-AUCH-0264) GoogleMaps . 1 ♂, same label data as holotype, except 4.XI.2014, DZRJ (DZRJ-AUCH-0265) GoogleMaps . 1 ♀ and 2 ♂, same label data as holotype, except 1.XI.2014, MNRJ GoogleMaps . 1 ♀, same label data as holotype, except 22°25’42.6”S, 44°37’42.2”W, 1442m, 21.XI.2013, DZRJ GoogleMaps (DZRJ-AUCH-0266).

Etymology. The species epithet derives from the Latin word spherae in apposition, meaning spheres, in allusion to the ivory spots on the anterior margin of the crown.

Remarks. Portanus spherae sp. nov. is similar to Portanus marginatus Carvalho & Cavichioli, 2003 by sharing aedeagus ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 20–29 ) with long preatrium, robust atrium, long dorsal apodemes, and shaft directed dorsally. However, it can be distinguished from the latter and other Portanini species because its following features: (1) pair of long posteroventral spiniform processes on pygofer ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 20–29 ); (2) internal female sternite VIII ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 30–37 ) sclerotized (recorded previously in the tribe only for Portanus adenomari Felix et al., 2020 ).

This species was collected at high altitudes at PNI (1,442 m and 2,255 m).

MNRJ

Museu Nacional/Universidade Federal de Rio de Janeiro

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Cicadellidae

Genus

Portanus

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF