Termitozophilus pilosus, Silva & Zilberman & Carvalho-Filho, 2022

Silva, Ruan Felipe Da, Zilberman, Bruno & Carvalho-Filho, Fernando Da Silva, 2022, Hidden Brazilian Amazon diversity: four new species, redescription and notes on natural history of Termitozophilus Silvestri, 1901 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae), Zootaxa 5209 (5), pp. 501-534 : 517-522

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5209.5.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:360B047E-5396-48AE-B26F-00B34BCB835A

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7469379

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E787F8-EB39-FFBD-5DF0-FF5EFEE63D7D

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Termitozophilus pilosus
status

sp. nov.

Termitozophilus pilosus sp. nov.

( Figs. 14–18 View FIGURE 14 View FIGURE 15 View FIGURE 16 View FIGURE 17 View FIGURE 18 , 27B View FIGURE 27 , 25 View FIGURE 25 , 28 View FIGURE 28 )

Type material. HOLOTYPE ♂ ( MPEG): Brasil [= Brazil], Pará, Peixe-Boi / Fazenda Abalém [Abalém Farm], 15.VII.2021 / R. F. Silva [collector], hospedeiro [= host]: Cornitermes pilosus .

PARATYPES. Same data as holotype, 5 ♂♂ and 5 ♀♀ in MZSUP ( MZSP 21290 View Materials , MZSP 21291 View Materials ) (1 ♀ and 1 ♂ dissected in slides, and 8 specimens in alcohol 70%); 5 ♂♂ and 5 ♀♀ in MPEG (in alcohol 70%); 1 ♀ and 1 ♂ in the CESP (in alcohol 70%); and 5 ♂♂ and 5 ♀♀ in the FMNH (in alcohol 70%) .

Diagnosis. Paratergites fused neither to each other nor to tergites and sternites; sclerotized areas of abdomen mostly light brown, with a large white-colored membranous area exposed in dorsal view. Head with vertex bearing two pairs of bristles, one bristle behind the eye and one on medial-posterior area. Elytra trapezoid with anteromesial border barely scaled. Hind wing membrane shed during post-imaginal growth. Posterior margin of sternite VIII with four bristles.

Description. Male—length ~ 1.3 mm ( Figs. 14C–D View FIGURE 14 ); female—length ~ 1.4 mm ( Figs. 14A–B View FIGURE 14 ).

Head subquadrate, about as wide as long, widest behind eye, almost narrowing posteriorly; eye about 1/3 of head length; vertex bearing two pairs of bristles: one bristle behind eye and one bristle on medial-posterior region ( Fig. 15A View FIGURE 15 ). Antenna: scape longer than remainder antennomeres, except antennomere XI; antennomere XI about three times longer than wide and more than twice longer than antennomere X; antennomeres II–VI elongate, gradually decreasing in length, antennomeres VII–X moniliform. Mouthparts. Labrum more than twice wider than long, with slight sinuous anterior margin; five main long bristles on each lateral half, arranged in two diagonal rows each with two bristles and one bristle placed above middle of labrum length ( Fig. 15C View FIGURE 15 ); epipharynx covered with sensilla and numerous short bristles, two of which longer. Mandible apex narrow, bearing a tooth on mesal region; with many punctuations on basal two thirds ( Figs. 15B View FIGURE 15 , 18A–C View FIGURE 18 ). Labium with ligula narrowed at base and with a median-apical emargination, resulting in two lobes; mentum and submentum distinct, both trapezoidal, with three bristles distributed on each lateral margin, as follows: apical, pre-apical, and proximal ( Fig. 17D View FIGURE 17 ).

Thorax. Elytra trapezoidal, longer than wide and wider at posterior region ( Fig. 16C View FIGURE 16 ), covering mesonotum and metanotum; anteromesial border barely scaled in internal view ( Figs. 17A–B View FIGURE 17 ); covered with long bristles. Hind wing membrane shed during post-imaginal growth, present as a stump ( Fig. 16B View FIGURE 16 ).

Abdomen with short tergites and with secondary sclerotization, not reaching inner paratergites; outer paratergites close to sternites margin by the former secondary sclerotization; inner and outer paratergites not fused ( Fig. 27B View FIGURE 27 ); first segment represented by a weak sclerotized tergite joined to metanotum ( Fig. 16B View FIGURE 16 ); sternites III–V with sparsely distributed pores; tergite VII ( Figs. 16D View FIGURE 16 , 18D–E View FIGURE 18 ) subquadrate, wider than long, with two rows of bristles, two bristle on medial region and six bristles on posterior half, anterior margin with conspicuous glandular area; tergite VIII ( Fig. 16G View FIGURE 16 ) almost subquadrate, with two rows of bristles, each with six main long bristles on medial and posterior regions, and with six moderated sized bristles on posterior margin; sternite VIII ( Fig. 16H View FIGURE 16 ) subquadrate, with acute posterior margin, with a row of six medial bristles, a row of eight posterior bristles, and four moderated sized bristles on posterior margin; male sternite IX ( Fig. 16F View FIGURE 16 ) elongate and tongue-shaped, with four bristles on posterior half; female sternite IX represented by a pair of hemisternites laterally attached to tergite IX ( Fig. 16I View FIGURE 16 ); tergite X ( Fig. 16E View FIGURE 16 ) not bilobed, with three long bristles on each lateral half and two bristles on medial region.

Etymology. The specific epithet “ pilosus ” referring to the host species “ C. pilosus ”.

Geographic distribution. Brazil (Pará).

Host termites. This species was found in epigeal (above-ground) nests of Cornitermes pilosus . This is the first record of a termitophilous rove beetle in the nest of this termite species.

Notes on behavior. During laboratory observations ( Fig. 1F View FIGURE 1 ), T. pilosus sp. nov. appears to be completely integrated into the colony of its host termite, since no agonistic interactions were observed, and the termites were seen palpating the beetles’ antennae, mouthparts, and abdomens. This species spent much of its time with the distal region of abdomen curled up over its body, not leaving the dorsal portion of the abdomen exposed. However, on other occasions, the abdomen was extended, exposing the tergites, which attracted termites that licked the gland present on tergite VII.

Discussion. Termitozophilus pilosus sp. nov. is similar to T. parapilosus sp. nov. in having abdominal sclerites mostly light brown and paratergites fused neither to each other nor to tergites and sternites ( Figs. 27A–E View FIGURE 27 ). See discussion under T. favachoi sp. nov. and T. parapilosus sp. nov. for the resemblances and differences between these species.

MPEG

Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi

R

Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile

FMNH

Field Museum of Natural History

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF